The Public’s Response to the Book of Mormon

A Critical Phenomenology of Scripture

Authors

  • Casey Logan A’Hearn University of Alabama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/post.27477

Keywords:

phenomenology, Book of Mormon, canon, authority, ninteenth-century America

Abstract

When the Book of Mormon was published in March 1830, it represented a textual shift from the Bible as the representation of sole scriptural truth to the possibility of the Book of Mormon as an equal contender. Within the New York newspaper scene, the Book of Mormon was constructed as a novel false scripture as well as a true culmination of prophecy by competing parties. Within these parties, social actors presented interesting rhetorical dynamics between the establishment of authority and competing Christian canons. Both parties use scripture – the Bible and the Book of Mormon – as tools to navigate the world. One party uses the Bible to argue that the Book of Mormon stands in opposition to an established Christian canon. The other argues that the Book of Mormon is a fulfilment of prophecy made necessary by the Bible. This paper explores the clash of authoritative discourses between those who understood the Book of Mormon as scripture and those who did not. Nevertheless, both groups insist on taking “scripture” seriously. Reading the archive with critical phenomenology, I argue that the publication of the Book of Mormon represents a historical moment where the identity formations of nineteenth-century Americans relied on a discourse of authority mediated through competing canons. 

Author Biography

  • Casey Logan A’Hearn, University of Alabama

    Casey A’Hearn graduated from the University of Alabama with a master’s in Religion in Culture. They are currently attending Princeton University in pursuit of their PhD. Casey’s research focuses on the construction of the category of scripture and its intersections with social theory.

References

Bell, Catherine. 2008. “Scriptures: Text and Then Some.” In Theorizing Scriptures New Critical Orientations to a Cultural Phenomenon, edited by Vincent L. Wimbush. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Blatchley, C. C. 1830. “Caution Against the Golden Bible.” New-York Telescope 6/38 (20 February). https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/4210/rec/1

Bushman, Richard. 2007. Joseph Smith: Rough stone rolling (J. Woodworth, Ed.). London: Vintage Books.

Cole, Abner. 1829. The Reflector. 1829. “Our Own Affairs.” The Reflector (Palmyra, NY) 1/5 (September 30). https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/156/rec/1

———. 1830a. “The Book of Pukei. Chap. I.” The Reflector (Palmyra, NY) 3rd ser.. 5 (12 June): 36–37. https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/277/

———. 1830b. “The Book of Pukei. Chap. 2.” The Reflector (Palmyra, NY) 3rd ser. 8 (7 July): 60.

Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell.

Levering, Miriam and Folkert, Kendall W. 1989. “The ‘Canons’ of ‘Scripture.’” In Rethinking Scripture: Essays from a Comparative Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Long, Charles H. 1986. Significations: Signs, Symbols, and Images in the Interpretation of Religion. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.

Martin, Craig. 2017. “8. How Religion Works: Authority.” In A Critical Introduction to the Study of Religion, 121–141. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Rochester Advertiser and Daily Telegraph. 1829. “Golden Bible.” Rochester Advertiser and Daily Telegraph (New York, 31 August). https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/175/rec/1

Rochester Daily Advertiser. 1830. “Blasphemy – ‘Book of Mormon,’ alias The Golden Bible.” Rochester Daily Advertiser (New York, 2 April).

Smith, Joseph. 1828.”Revelation, July 1828 [D&C 3]” 1–2. The Joseph Smith Papers. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/revelation-july-1828-dc-3/2. Accessed 11 February 2023.

———. 1829a “Revelation, February 1829 [D&C 4],” p. [1], The Joseph Smith Papers. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/revelation-february-1829-dc-4/1. Accessed 1 April 2023.

———. 1829b. “Revelation, June 1829–B [D&C 18].” 35, The Joseph Smith Papers. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/revelation-june-1829-b-dc-18/2. Accessed 12 April 2024.

———. 1829c “Preface to Book of Mormon, circa August 1829, Page iii.” The Joseph Smith Papers. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/preface-to-book-of-mormon-circa-august-1829/1. Accessed 2 April 2023.

———. 1830. “Book of Mormon, 1830.” The Joseph Smith Papers. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/book-of-mormon-1830/117. Accessed 15 April 2023.

———. 1835. “Doctrine and Covenants, 1835.” 78, The Joseph Smith Papers. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/doctrine-and-covenants-1835/86. Accessed 10 April 2023.

———. 1851. The Pearl of Great Price. Liverpool: F. D. Richards. https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/assets/777118c9-9529-4cb1-823d36833959ec1f/0/24?lang=eng. Accessed 21 November 2023.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2020. “History of the Scriptures.” 1 January. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/about-the-scriptures/history?lang=eng

The Evening and the Morning Star. 1832. “Persecution.” The Evening and the Morning Star, vol. 1, section 1. https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/NCMP1820-1846/id/5650/rec/9

The Gem. 1830. “Imposition and Blasphemy!!—Moneydiggers, Etc.” The Gem (Rochester, NY, 15 May): 15. https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/232/rec/36

The Reflector. 1830. “Diabolical.” The Reflector (Palmyra, NY) ns 8 (27 February). https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/363/rec/1

Watts, James W. 2015. “The Three Dimensions of Scriptures.” In Iconic Books and Texts, 9–32. Sheffield: Equinox.

Wayne Sentinel. 1829. [Just about in this particular region.] Wayne Sentinel (Palmyra, NY, 26 June 26). https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/BOMP/id/186/rec/1

Wimbush, Vincent L. 2017. Scripturalectics: The Management of Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.

Published

2024-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A’Hearn, C. L. (2024). The Public’s Response to the Book of Mormon: A Critical Phenomenology of Scripture. Postscripts: The Journal of Sacred Texts, Cultural Histories, and Contemporary Contexts, 15(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.27477