Drinkable Ink or Womb-Destroying Words?
A Solution for Suspected Adultery in Numbers 5:11–31
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/post.25993Keywords:
Hebrew Bible, Book of Numbers, Sotah, Priesthood, Adultery, PentateuchAbstract
The biblical text of Numbers 5:11–31 describes a ritual designed to determine the guilt or innocence of a woman suspected of adultery: she must drink a mixture of water, dirt, and the ink of written curses given to her by a priest. This article analyses how the ritualized use of a material sacred text as described in Numbers 5:11–31 – and the ways it interacts with the bodies of the people involved – impacts the biblical construction of gender identities. Using concepts introduced by R. W. Connell, I argue that the ritual makes use of a material sacred text to reinforce a hegemonic masculine identity for the Israelite priesthood, while encouraging the complicit masculinity of laymen and the subjugated feminine identity of women. In doing so, the ritual of Numbers 5:11–31 bolsters the hierarchy of gender identities constructed by the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch more broadly.
References
Bach, Alice. 1999. “Good to the Last Drop: Viewing the Sotah (Numbers 5.11–31) as the Glass Half Empty and Wondering How to View it Half Full.” In Women in the Hebrew Bible: A Reader, edited by Alice Bach, 503–22. New York: Routledge.
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28(3): 801–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
Brichto, Herbert Chanan. 1975. “The Case of the Sota and a Reconsideration of Biblical ‘Law.’” Hebrew Union College Annual 46: 55–70.
Britt, Brian. 2007. “Male Jealousy and the Suspected Sotah: Toward a Counter-Reading of Numbers 5:11–31.” The Bible and Critical Theory 3(1): 5.1–5.19. https://doi.org/10.2104/bc070005
Camp, Claudia V. 2015. “Numbers 5:11–31: Women in Second Temple Judah and the Law of the Controlling Priest.” In Celebrate her for the Fruit of her Hands: Essays in Honor of Carol L. Meyers, edited by S. Ackerman, C. E. Carter, and B. A. Nakhai, 111–32. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Clines, David J. A. 2010. “Dancing and Shining at Sinai: Playing the Man in Exodus 32–34.” In Men and Masculinity in the Hebrew Bible and Beyond, edited by Ovidiu Creanga, 54–63. The Bible in the Modern World 33. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
Connell, R. W. 2005. Masculinities. 2nd edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Destro, Adriana. 2020. The Law of Jealousy: Anthropology of the Sotah. 2nd edition. Brown Judaic Studies 181. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Eilberg-Schwartz, Howard. 1994. God’s Phallus and Other Problems for Men and Monotheism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Ellens, Deborah L. 2009. “Numbers 5:11–31: Valuing Male Suspicion.” In God’s Word For Our World, edited by D. L. Ellens, J. H. Ellens, I. Kalimi, R. Knierim, and D. J. H. Ellens, 1: 55–82. London: Bloomsbury.
Fishbane, Michael. 1974. “Accusations of Adultery: A Study of Law and Scribal Practice in Numbers 5:11–31.” Hebrew Union College Annual 45: 25–45.
Frevel, Christian. 2013. “The Book of Numbers: Formation, Composition, and Interpretation of a Late Part of the Torah. Some Introductory Remarks.” In Torah and the Book of Numbers, edited by Christian Frevel, Thomas Pola, and Aaron Schart, 1–38. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
———. 2018. “On Instant Scripture and Proximal Texts: Some Insights into the Sensual Materiality of Texts and their Ritual Roles in the Hebrew Bible and Beyond.” In Sensing Sacred Texts, edited by James W. Watts, 57–79. Comparative Research on Iconic and Performative Texts. Sheffield: Equinox.
———. 2020. Desert Transformations: Studies in the Book of Numbers. Forschungen zum Alten Testament 137. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Frymer-Kensky, Tikva. 1984. “The Strange Case of the Suspected Sotah (Numbers V 11–31).” Vetus Testamentum 34(1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853384x00025
Fuchs, Esther. 2001. “Prophecy and the Construction of Women: Inscription and Erasure.” In Prophets and Daniel: A Feminist Companion to the Bible, edited by Athalya Brenner, 54–69. The Feminist Companion to the Bible (2nd ser.) 8. London: Sheffield Academic Press.
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1993. “A Thousand Tiny Sexes: Feminism and Rhizomatics.” Topoi 12: 167–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00821854
Haberman, Bonna Devora. 2000. “The Suspected Adulteress: A Study of Textual Embodiment.” Prooftexts 20(1–2): 12–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/ptx.2000.0004
Haddox, Susan E. 2016. “Masculinity Studies of the Hebrew Bible: The First Two Decades.” Currents in Biblical Research 14(2): 176–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993x15575496
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Hazard, Sonia. 2013. “The Material Turn in the Study of Religion.” Religion and Society: Advances in Research 4: 58–78.
Hooker, Alan. 2014. “‘Show me Your Glory’: The Kabod of Yahweh as Phallic Manifestation?” In Biblical Masculinities Foregrounded, edited by Ovidiu Creanga and Peter-Ben Smit, 17–34. Hebrew Bible Monographs 62. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
Leichty, Erle. 1970. The Omen Series Šumma Izbu. Texts from Cuneiform Sources. Locust Valley, NY: J. J. Augustin.
Levering, Miriam. 1989. “Scripture and its Reception: A Buddhist Case.” In Rethinking Scripture: Essays from a Comparative Perspective, edited by Miriam Levering, 58–101. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Levine, Baruch A. 1993. Numbers 1–20. The Anchor Bible 4A. New York: Doubleday.
Malley, Brian. 2004. How the Bible Works: An Anthropological Study of Evangelical Biblicism. Cognitive Science of Religion Series. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
McKane, W. 1980. “Poison, Trial by Ordeal and the Cup of Wrath.” Vetus Testamentum 30(4): 474–92. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853380x00434
Milgrom, Jacob. 1989. The JPS Torah Commentary: Numbers. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society.
Morgan, David. 2010. “Introduction: The Matter of Belief.” In Religion and Material Culture: The Matter of Belief, edited by David Morgan, 1–17. London: Routledge.
———. 2016. “Materiality.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion, edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler, 271–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2021. The Thing about Religion: An Introduction to the Material Study of Religions. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Rees, Anthony. 2013. “Toward an Ecological Reading of the Sotah Ritual.” Pacific Journal of Theology 2(50): 28–37.
Schleicher, Marianne. 2011. “Artefactual and Hermeneutical Use of Scripture in Jewish Tradition.” In Jewish and Christian Scripture as Artifact and Canon, edited by C. A. Evans and H. D. Zacharias, 48–65. London: Bloomsbury.
———. 2017. “Engaging All the Senses: On Multi-Sensory Stimulation in the Process of Making and Inaugurating a Torah Scroll.” Postscripts 8(1–2): 39–56.
———. 2021. “Effects of Materiality in Israelite-Jewish Conceptions of Gender and Love: On a Necessary Synthesis of Constructionist and New Materialist Approaches.” In Entanglements and Weaving: Diffractive Approaches to Gender and Love, edited by Deirdre C. Byrne and Marianne Schleicher, 11–33. Leiden: Brill Rodopi.
Scholz, Susanne. 2021. “Dismantling the Phallic Economy with a Hermeneutics of Reproductive Justice: A Reconsideration of the Sotah in Numbers 5:11–31.” Journal of Religious Ethics 49(2): 270–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12351
Scurlock, J. A. 1991. “Baby-Snatching Demons, Restless Souls and the Dangers of Childbirth: Medico-Magical Means of Dealing with Some of the Perils of Motherhood in Ancient Mesopotamia.” Incognita 2: 135–83.
Sencindiver, Susan Yi. 2017. “New Materialism.” In Oxford Bibliographies: Literary and Critical Theory, edited by Eugene O’Brien. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780190221911/obo-9780190221911-0016.xml
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1987. To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stiebert, Johanna. 2019. “Divinely Sanctioned Violence Against Women: Biblical Marriage and the Example of the Sotah of Numbers 5.” The Bible and Critical Theory 15(2): 83–108.
Villareal, Erin. 2022. Jealousy in Context: The Social Implications of Emotions in the Hebrew Bible. Siphrut: Literature and Theology of the Hebrew Scriptures. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Watts, James W. 2006. “The Three Dimensions of Scriptures.” Postscripts 2(2–3): 135–59.
———. 2013. “Disposing of Non-Disposable Texts: Conclusions and Prospects for Further Study.” In Death of Sacred Texts, 147–59. Farnham: Ashgate.
———. 2015. “Iconic Scriptures from Decalogue to Bible.” Studies in Book Culture 6(2): 1–12.
———. 2018. “Scriptures’ Indexical Touch.” In Sensing Sacred Texts, edited by James W. Watts, 173–84. Comparative Research on Iconic and Performative Texts. Sheffield: Equinox.
