Sacred Texts and Their Subjects, Now and Then

Authors

  • Mark K. George Iliff School of Theology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/post.20373

Keywords:

Digital Bibles, Affordances, Subjectivity

Abstract

As the digital revolution extends to the ways people encounter sacred texts such as the Bible, a change is underway both with respect to the texts and to the readers of them. Technologies offer (i.e., afford) possibilities to their users, and these alter the ways in which those users understand and form themselves. Thus, print Bibles create different types of readers than do digital Bibles, even if the content of the Bible does not change. These changes are disruptive for some yet also offer new possibilities for the Bible and its readers. This article considers several affordances of print and digital Bibles before turning to a consideration of how those of digital Bibles are likely to change the subjectivity of readers.

References

Accordance Bible Software. 2021. https://www.accordancebible.com/. Accessed 25 April 2021.

Beal, Timothy K. 2011. The Rise and Fall of the Bible: The Unexpected History of an Accidental Book. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Carr, David M. 2005. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2011. The Formation of the Hebrew Bible: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199742608.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199742608.001.0001

Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Dissemination. Translated by Barbara Johnson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Drucker, Johanna. 1995. The Alphabetic Labyrinth: The Letter in History and Imagination. London: Thames and Hudson.

———. 2014 Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

———. 2017. “Information Visualization and/as Enunciation.” Journal of Documentation. 73: 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2017-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2017-0004

George, Mark K. 2021. “Writing, Affordances, and Governable Subjects.” Journal for Religion, Film and Media 7: 33–44.

Gibson, James J. 2015. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Classic Editions. New York: Psychology Press Classic Editions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218

Hemenway, Michael P. 2017. “Bible as Interface.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Denver–Iliff School of Theology.

Koopman, Colin. 2019. How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226626611.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226626611.001.0001

Overhill, Heidi. 2012. “J. J. Gibson and Marshall McLuhan: A Survey of Terminology and a Proposed Extension of the Theory of Affordances.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901340

OED Online. 2021. Oxford University Press. https://www-oed-com.du.idm.oclc.org/view/Entry/80304. Accessed 12 June 2021.

Person, Jr., Raymond F. 2021. “Self-Referential Phrases in Deuteronomy: A Reassessment Based on Recent Studies Concerning Scribal Performance and Memory.” In Collective Memory and Collective Identity: Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History and Their Context, edited by Johannes Unsok Ro and Diana Edelman, 217–242. Beihefte zur Zeitscrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 534. London: T&T Clark. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110715101-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110715101-009

Plato. 1914. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Translated by Henry North Fowler. Loeb Classical Library 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.plato_philosopher-euthyphro.1914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.plato_philosopher-euthyphro.1914

Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. 1977. “An Archaic Recording System and the Origin of Writing.” Syro-Mesopotamian Studies 1: 1–32.

———. 1978. “The Earliest Precursor of Writing.” Scientific American 238: 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0678-50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0678-50

———. 1979. “An Archaic Recording System in the Uruk-Jemdet Nasr Period.” American Journal of Archaeology 83: 19–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/504234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/504234

Siker, Jeffrey S. 2017. Liquid Scripture: The Bible in a Digital World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt87v DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt87v

———. 2020. “Bible as Book in the Digital Realm.” Hebrew Studies 61: 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2020.0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2020.0024

Sonnet, Jean-Pierre. 1997. The Book Within the Book: Writing in Deuteronomy. Biblical Interpretation Series 14. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495616

YouVersion. The Bible App. 2021 https://www.youversion.com/. Accessed 25 April 2021.

Published

2021-11-02

How to Cite

George, M. K. . (2021). Sacred Texts and Their Subjects, Now and Then. Postscripts: The Journal of Sacred Texts, Cultural Histories, and Contemporary Contexts, 12(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.20373