Sacred Texts and Their Subjects, Now and Then


  • Mark K. George Iliff School of Theology



Digital Bibles, Affordances, Subjectivity


As the digital revolution extends to the ways people encounter sacred texts such as the Bible, a change is underway both with respect to the texts and to the readers of them. Technologies offer (i.e., afford) possibilities to their users, and these alter the ways in which those users understand and form themselves. Thus, print Bibles create different types of readers than do digital Bibles, even if the content of the Bible does not change. These changes are disruptive for some yet also offer new possibilities for the Bible and its readers. This article considers several affordances of print and digital Bibles before turning to a consideration of how those of digital Bibles are likely to change the subjectivity of readers.


Accordance Bible Software. 2021. Accessed 25 April 2021.

Beal, Timothy K. 2011. The Rise and Fall of the Bible: The Unexpected History of an Accidental Book. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Carr, David M. 2005. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2011. The Formation of the Hebrew Bible: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:

Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Dissemination. Translated by Barbara Johnson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Drucker, Johanna. 1995. The Alphabetic Labyrinth: The Letter in History and Imagination. London: Thames and Hudson.

———. 2014 Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

———. 2017. “Information Visualization and/as Enunciation.” Journal of Documentation. 73: 903–916. DOI:

George, Mark K. 2021. “Writing, Affordances, and Governable Subjects.” Journal for Religion, Film and Media 7: 33–44.

Gibson, James J. 2015. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Classic Editions. New York: Psychology Press Classic Editions. DOI:

Hemenway, Michael P. 2017. “Bible as Interface.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Denver–Iliff School of Theology.

Koopman, Colin. 2019. How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI:

Overhill, Heidi. 2012. “J. J. Gibson and Marshall McLuhan: A Survey of Terminology and a Proposed Extension of the Theory of Affordances.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49: 1–4. DOI:

OED Online. 2021. Oxford University Press. Accessed 12 June 2021.

Person, Jr., Raymond F. 2021. “Self-Referential Phrases in Deuteronomy: A Reassessment Based on Recent Studies Concerning Scribal Performance and Memory.” In Collective Memory and Collective Identity: Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History and Their Context, edited by Johannes Unsok Ro and Diana Edelman, 217–242. Beihefte zur Zeitscrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 534. London: T&T Clark. DOI:

Plato. 1914. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Translated by Henry North Fowler. Loeb Classical Library 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI:

Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. 1977. “An Archaic Recording System and the Origin of Writing.” Syro-Mesopotamian Studies 1: 1–32.

———. 1978. “The Earliest Precursor of Writing.” Scientific American 238: 50–59. DOI:

———. 1979. “An Archaic Recording System in the Uruk-Jemdet Nasr Period.” American Journal of Archaeology 83: 19–48. DOI:

Siker, Jeffrey S. 2017. Liquid Scripture: The Bible in a Digital World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press. DOI:

———. 2020. “Bible as Book in the Digital Realm.” Hebrew Studies 61: 173–196. DOI:

Sonnet, Jean-Pierre. 1997. The Book Within the Book: Writing in Deuteronomy. Biblical Interpretation Series 14. Leiden: Brill. DOI:

YouVersion. The Bible App. 2021 Accessed 25 April 2021.



How to Cite

George, M. K. . (2021). Sacred Texts and Their Subjects, Now and Then. Postscripts: The Journal of Sacred Texts, Cultural Histories, and Contemporary Contexts, 12(1), 111–132.