Facebook and Martin Luther
Media Technology, Accessibility, and Expertise in Three Dimensions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/post.20263Keywords:
media, writing, publishing, printing, social media, expertise, access, literacy, religion, politicsAbstract
It is widely believed that the ease of internet publishing in the early twenty–first century has undermined respect for expertise, raising fears of interpretive anarchy in popular discourse about science, politics, and morality. The internet has increased access not only to information but also to the means of publication. The results have been intentionally and unintentionally disruptive to politics (growing demagogic nationalism) as well as to various kinds of businesses (such as newspapers). These developments, however, are not unprecedented, except perhaps in scale. They are the typical social side effects of introducing new media technologies. New media have historically fueled populist movements in religion and politics, as a review of Christian history shows. It also shows that the new media then get used to recreate methods for reasserting the interpretive authority of experts. These rival tendencies are generated by the three-dimensional nature of all written media. These social consequences are therefore intrinsic to writing’s use ever since its invention five thousand years ago.
References
Beal, Timothy. 2011. The Rise and Fall of the Bible: The Unexpected History of an Accidental Book. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Brecht, Martin. 1993. Martin Luther: The Preservation of the Church, 1532–1546, volume 3. Translated by James L. Schaff. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Cantwell, Cathy. 2018. “Seeing, Touching, Holding, and Swallowing Tibetan Buddhist Texts.” In Sensing Sacred Texts, edited by J. W. Watts, 137–160. Sheffield: Equinox. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.32531
The Economist, December 17, 2017: “Social media in the 16th Century: How Luther went viral.”
Edwards, Mark U., Jr. 2004. Printing, Propaganda, and Martin Luther. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communication and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe, 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021121400026225
Fea, John. 2016. The Bible Cause: A History of the American Bible Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190253066.001.0001
Goody, Jack. 1986. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621598
Howsom, Leslie and Scott McLaren. 2015. “Producing the Text: Production and Distribution of Popular Editions of the Bible.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible, Volume 4, edited by John Riches, 49–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9780511842870.005
Lule, Jack. 2012. Globalization and Media: Global Village of Babel. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
Myrvold, Kristina. 2013. “Engaging with the Guru: Sikh Beliefs and Practices of Guru Granth Sahib.” In Iconic Books and Texts, edited by J. W. Watts, 261–281. Sheffield: Equinox.
Parmenter, Dorina Miller. 2010. “A Fitting Ceremony: Christian Concerns for Bible Disposal.” In The Death of Sacred Texts: Ritual Disposal and Renovation of Texts in World Religions, edited by K. Myrvold, 55–70. Farnham: Ashgate.
———. 2021. “Being the Bible: Sacred Bodies and Iconic Books in Bring Your Bible to School Day.” In Books as Bodies and as Sacred Beings, edited by J. W. Watts and Y. Yoo, 51–66. Sheffield: Equinox. Reprinted from Postscripts 10(1–2), (2019), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.38256
Pettegree, Andrew. 2005. Reformation and the Culture of Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614613
Roper, Amelie. 2017. “German Music Broadsheets, 1500–1550: Production, Persuasion and Performance.” In Broadsheets: Single-Sheet Publishing in the First Age of Print, edited by A. Pettegree, 401–441. Leiden: Brill.
Sanneh, Lamin. 2015. “Translations of the Bible and the Cultural Impulse.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible, Volume 4, edited by John Riches, 83–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9780511842870.006
Schleicher, Marianne. 2009. “Artifactual and Hermeneutical Uses of Scripture in Jewish Tradition.” In Jewish and Christian Scripture as Artifact and Canon, edited by C. A. Evans and H. D. Zacharias, 48–65. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Standage, Tom. 2013. Writing on the Wall: Social Media – The First 2,000 Years. London: Bloomsbury.
Stern, David. 2017. The Jewish Bible: A Material History. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Suit, Natalia K. 2013. “Mus?af and the Material Boundaries of the Qur?an.” In Iconic Books and Texts, edited by J. W. Watts, 189–206. Sheffield: Equinox.
Svensson, Jonas. 2010. “Relating, Revering, and Removing: Muslim Views on the Use, Power, and Disposal of Divine Words.” In The Death of Sacred Texts: Ritual Disposal and Renovation of Texts in World Religions, edited by K. Myrvold, 31–53. Farnham: Ashgate.
Tuladhar-Douglas, Will. “Writing and the Rise of Mahayana Buddhism.” In Die Textualisierung der Religion, edited by J. Schaper, 250–272. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Watts, James W. 2017. Understanding the Pentateuch as A Scripture. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119415374
———. 2019. How and Why Books Matter: Essays on the Social Function of Iconic Texts. Sheffield: Equinox.
Wikipedia. “Wikipedia: Citing Sources.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources (accessed April 8, 2021).
Wikipedia. “Wikipedia: About.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About (accessed April 8, 2021).
