An Ass in a Lion’s Skin
The Subversion of Judah’s Hegemonic Masculinity in Genesis 38
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/post.18177Keywords:
Masculinity, Genesis, Judah, Tamar, Genesis 38, narrative criticismAbstract
The book of Genesis gives two opposing portraits of Judah’s masculinity. On the one hand, he is shown as the leader of Jacob’s sons, and on the other he is ridiculed by his daughter-in-law. Is Judah an ass in a lion’s skin? This article explores Judah’s antithetical masculinities as examples of the inherently unstable nature of gender construction. Although Judah is only the fourth son of Jacob, he is expressly depicted in Genesis as assuming a leadership role in relation to his brothers, including speaking up against killing Joseph, negotiating with his father regarding Joseph’s demand that Benjamin be brought down to Egypt, and pleading with Joseph for Benjamin’s life. In Genesis 49: 8–12, Judah receives the most favourable treatment of all Jacob’s sons. The blessing of Jacob from his deathbed portrays Judah’s hegemonic masculinity at its finest. However, in Genesis 38, Judah’s masculine performance far from ideal biblical masculinity. Not only does Judah lack persuasiveness when he accuses Tamar, but she is able to persuade him that his own actions were wrong. Judah is deceived, specifically deceived by a woman. The shame he wants to attribute to Tamar rebounds on himself. In the end, he acknowledges himself to be less righteous than Tamar (Gen 38: 26). The episode as a whole reveals that Judah does not have control of his family. Genesis 38 clearly subverts Judah’s hegemonic masculinity. What are the rhetorical effects of this subversion of Judah’s hegemonic gender construction? Jacob speaks of Judah as a lion, but in Genesis 38 he seems to have been portrayed in the role of the ass.
References
Adelman, Rachel. 2011. “From Veils to Goatskins: The Female Ruse in Genesis.” Journal of Textual Reasoning 6.2. https://jtr.shanti.virginia.edu/volume-6-number-2/fromveils-to-goatskins-the-female-ruse-in-genesis/
Alter, Robert. 2011. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic Books.
Bekins, Peter. 2016. “Tamar and Joseph in Genesis 38 and 39.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 40: 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089215611545
Brodie, Thomas L. 2001. Genesis as Dialogue: A Literary, Historical & Theological Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bird, Phyllis. 1989. “The Harlot as Heroine: Narrative Art and Social Presupposition in three Old Testament Texts.” Semeia 46: 119–139.
Blachman, Esther. 2013. The Transformation of Tamar (Genesis 38) in the History of Jewish Interpretation. Leuven: Peeters.
Bos, Johanna W. H. 1988. “Out of the Shadows: Genesis 38; Judges 4: 17–22; Ruth 3.” Semeia 42: 37–67.
Brodie, Thomas L. 2001. Genesis as Dialogue: A Literary, Historical & Theological Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brueggemann, Walter. 1982. Genesis. International Biblical Commentary. Atlanta, GA: John Knox.
Burnet, Régis, Didier Luciani and Geert van Oyen. 2015. Le lecteur. Sixième colloque international du RRENAB. Leuven: Peeters.
Cornwall, Andrea and Nancy Lindisfarne. 1994. Dislocating Masculinity Comparative Ethnographies. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
Chan, Chi Wai. 2015. “The Ultimate Trickster in the Story of Tamar from a Feminist Perspective.” Feminist Theology 24: 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735015597827
Clifford, Richard J. 2004. “Genesis 38: Its Contribution to the Jacob Story.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 66: 519–532.
Clines, David. 1995. “David the Man: The Construction of Masculinity in the Hebrew Bible.” In Interested Parties: The Ideology of Writers and Readers of the Hebrew Bible edited by David Clines, 212–241. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Connell, Raewyn W. 1987. Gender and Power. Sydney: Allen, Mercer and Urwin.
Connell, Raewyn W. and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender & Society 19: 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Demetrakis Z. Demetriou. 2001. “Connell’s Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique.” Theory & Society 30: 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017596718715
DiPalma, Brian Charles. 2018. Masculinities in the Court Tales of Daniel: Advancing Gender Studies in the Hebrew Bible. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315192260
Doane, Sébastien. 2019 “Masculinities of the Husbands in the Genealogy of Jesus (Matt. 1:2-16).” Biblical Interpretation 27: 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-
P05
Eilberg-Schwartz, Howard. 1994. God’s Phallus and Other Problems for Men and Monotheism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Fuchs, Ester. 1985. “Who Is Hiding the Truth? Deceptive Women and Biblical Androcentrism.” In Feminist Perspectives on Biblical Scholarship, edited by Adela Yarbro Collins, 137–144. Atlanta, GA: Society for Biblical Literature.
———. 2000. Sexual Politics in the Biblical Narrative. Reading the Hebrew Bible as a Woman. London: Sheffield Academic Press.
Graybill, Rhiannon. 2016. Are We Not Men? Unstable Masculinity in the Hebrew Prophets. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190227364.001.0001
Haddox, Susan E. 2010. “Favoured Sons and Subordinate Masculinities.” In Men and Masculinity in the Hebrew Bible and Beyond, edited by Ovidiu Creanga, 2–19. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
———. 2014. “Masculinity and Femininity in the Hebrew Bible.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies, edited by Julia M. O’Brien, 512–518. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2015. “Masculinity Studies.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation, edited by Steven L. Mckenzie, 533–542. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016. “Masculinity Studies of the Hebrew Bible: The First Two Decades.” Currents in Biblical Research 14: 176–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X15575496
Gunn, David M. and Danna Nolan Fewell. 1993. Narrative in the Hebrew Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heck, Joel D. 1990. “A History of Interpretation of Genesis 49 and Deuteronomy 33.” Bibliotheca Sacra 147: 316–317.
Jackson, Melissa. 2002. “Lot’s Daughters and Tamar as Tricksters and the Patriarchal Narratives as Feminist Theology.” Journal of the Study of the Old Testament 26: 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/030908920202600402
Kim, Dohyung. 2012. “The Structure of Genesis 38: A Thematic Reading.” Vetust Testamentum 62: 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341083
Kimmel, Michael and Bridges, Tristan. 2014. “Masculinities.” Oxford Bibliographies in Sociology. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0033.xml
La Fontaine, Jean de. 1668. Fables. Paris: Claude Barbin.
Lambe, Anthony J. 1999. “Judah’s Development: The Pattern of Departure-Transition-Return.” Journal of the Study of the Old Testament 24: 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/030908929902408304
Mckinlay, Judith E. 1999. “Rahab: a Hero/Ine?” Biblical Interpretation 7: 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851599X00236
Menn, Esther Marie. 1997. Judah and Tamar (Genesis 38) in Ancient Jewish Exegesis. Leiden: Brill.
Moore, Stephen D. 2010. “Final reflections on Biblical Masculinity.” In Men and Masculinity in the Hebrew Bible and Beyond, edited by Ovidiu Creanga, 240–255. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
———. 2014. “Masculinity Studies.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies, edited by Julia M. O’Brien, 540–547. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niditch, Susan. 1979. “The Wronged Woman Righted: An Analysis of Genesis 38.” Harvard Theological Review 72: 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000029837
Nobuko, Morimura. 1993. “The Story of Tamar: A Feminist Interpretation of Genesis 38,” The Japan Christian Review 59: 55–67.
Probstle, Martin. 2007. “‘Lion of Judah’: The Blessing on Judah in Genesis 49: 8–12.” In “For You Have Strengthened Me,” Biblical and Theological Studies, edited by Martin Probstle, 23–49. St Peter am Hart: Seminar Schloss Bogenhofen.
Rendsburg, Gary A. 1986. “David and His Circle in Genesis 38.” Vetust Testamentum 36: 38–446. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853386X00249
Shields, Mary E. 2003. “‘More Righteous than I’: The Comeuppance of the Trickster in Genesis 38.” In Are We Amused? Humour about Woman in the Biblical Worlds edited by Athalya Brenner, 31–53. London: T&T Clark.
Smit, Peter-Ben. 2017. Masculinity and the Bible: Survey, Models, and Perspectives. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004345584
Spencer, Scott F. 2003. “Those Riotous—Yet Righteous—Foremothers of Jesus: Exploring Matthew’s Comic Genealogy.” In Are We Amused? Humour about Women in the Biblical Worlds, edited by Athalya Brenner, 7–30. London: T&T Clark.
Von Rad, Gerhard. 1964. Das Erste Buch Mose: Genesis. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
Wenham, Gordon J. 1994. Genesis: 16–50. Dallas, TX: Word Books.
Westermann, Claus. 1982. Genesis. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag.
Wünch, Hans-Georg. 2012. “Genesis 38—Judah’s Turning Point: Structural analysis and Narrative Techniques and Their meaning for Genesis 38 and Its Placement in the Story of Joseph.” Old Testament Essays 25: 777–807.
