Learning from Zu˜ni war gods
Repatriating alternative dispute resolution for practice and research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/mtp.34015Keywords:
alternative dispute resolution, mediation, family law, court mediation, Zuni family relations, family interventioinAbstract
This article applies lessons learned from the Zu˜ni people of the southwestern United States about successful and sustainable intervention as a metaphor to address common tensions among alternative dispute resolution (ADR) scholars and practitioners. These tensions are found in professionalisation, institutionalisation and identification of best practices. Through example of Zu˜ni efforts to repatriate sacred artefacts known as Ahuy: da, I argue that ADR is an intervention that works best through direct and ongoing dialogue rather than rigid adherence to a set of standards. The problem lies in how such adherence can limit and distort rather than inform or support best practices in research as well as mediation practice. I propose qualitative, ethnographic field research as a way to address this problem, and provide an example from ongoing study of a US family court mediation programme.
References
Alfini, J., Barkai, J., Bush, R. Hermann, M., Hyman, J. Kovach, K., Liebman, C., Press, S. and L. Riskin. (1994) What happens when mediation is institutionalised? Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 307–32.
Amato, P., Kane, J. and Spencer, James. (2011) Reconsidering the ‘good divorce’. Family Relations 60: 511–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00666.x
Ballard, R., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A. and D’Onofrio, B. (2011) Factors affecting the outcome of divorce and paternity mediations. Family Court Review 49(1): 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01350.x
Bernard, H.R. (2002) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burawoy, M. (2003) Revisits: an outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography. American Sociological Review 68(5): 645–79. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519757
Coben, J. (2006) Intentional conversations about the globalization of ADR. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 27: 217–27.
Coy, P. G. and Hedeen, T. (2005) A stage model of social movement co?optation: community mediation in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly 46(3): 405–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00020.x
Crampton, A. (2006) Fall 2005 Dispute Resolution Symposium: addressing questions of culture and power in the globalization of ADR: lessons from African influence on American mediation. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 27(2): 229–41.
Crampton, A. (2015) Ethnographic refusal as research method. Qualitative Social Work 14(4): 453 470.
Dingwall, R. (2010) Divorce mediation: should we change our mind? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 32(2): 107–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506307
Dingwall, R. and Kidd, K. (2003). After the fall …: capitulating to the routine in professional work. Penn State Law Review 108: 67–89.
Emery, R. (2012) Renegotiating Family Relationships: Divorce, Child Custody, and Mediation (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press.
Ferguson, T. J., Anyon, R. and Ladd, E. J. (2000) Repatriation at the Pueblo of Zu˜ni: diverse solutions to complex problems. In D. A. Mihesua (ed.) Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains? 282–91. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Fineman, M. (1991) The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Greatbatch and Dingwall, R. (1999) The marginalization of domestic violence in divorce mediation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 13(2): 174–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/13.2.174
Grillo, T. (1991) The mediation alternative: process dangers for women. The Yale Law Journal 100(6): 1545–1610. https://doi.org/10.2307/796781
Harrington, C. B. and Merry, S. E. (1988) Ideological production: the making of community mediation. Law and Society Review 22(4): 709–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053707
Johnson, J. (2001) Contaminated collections: preservation, access, and use. In Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC) Shepherdstown, West Virginia April 6–9, 2001. Retrieved on 2 November 2017 from www.spnhc.org/media/assets/cofo_2001_V17N12.pdf.
Mayer, B. (2013) Mediation: 50 years of creative conflict. Family Court Review 51(1): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12005
McAdoo, B. and N. A. Welsh. (2004) Look before you leap and keep on looking: lessons from the institutionalization of court-connected mediation. Nevada Law Journal 5: 399–432.
Merenstein, A. (1992) The Zu˜ni quest for repatriation of the war gods: an alternative basis for claim. American Indian Law Review 71(2): 589–637. https://doi.org/10.2307/20062567
Merry, S. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mnookin, R. H. and Kornhauser, L. (1979) Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce. The Yale Law Journal 88(5): 950–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/795824
Moloney, L., Qu, L., Weston, R. and Hand, K. (2013) Evaluating the work of Australia’s family relationship centres: evidence from the first 5 years. Family Court Review 51(2): 234–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12023
Murphy, J. and Singer, J. (2015) Divorced from Reality: Rethinking Family Dispute Resolution. New York: New York University Press.
Nader, L. (1993) Controlling processes in the practice of law: hierarchy and pacification in the movement to reform dispute ideology. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 1–25.
Parkinson, P. (2014) The payoffs and pitfalls of laws that encourage shared parenting: lessons learned from the Australian experience. Dalhousie Law Journal 37: 301–43.
Patton, B. (1984) On Teaching Negotiation. Program on Negotiation working paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School.
Press, S. (2013) Family court services: a reflection on 50 years of contributions. Family Court Review 51(1): 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12007
Redmond, B. (2004) Reflection in Action: Developing Reflective Practice in Health and Social Services. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Salem, P. (2009) The emergence of triage in family court services: the beginning of the end for mandatory mediation? Family Court Review 47(3): 371–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01262.x
Saposnek, D. (2004) Commentary: The future of the history of family mediation research. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22(1–2): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.91
Schneider, A. K. (2012) Foreword: the future of court ADR: mediation and beyond. Marquette Law Review 95(3): 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804074-4.00015-7
Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Silbey, S. (1993) Mediation mythology. Negotiation Journal 9(4): 349–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1993.tb00722.x
Simpson, B. (1998) Changing Families. Oxford: Berg Books.
Singer, J. (2008) Dispute resolution and the post-divorce family: implications of a paradigm shift. Family Court Review 47(3): 363–70.
Staller, K. (2006) Railroads, runaways, and researchers: returning evidence rhetoric to its practice base. Qualitative Inquiry 12(3): 503–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286524
Stokoe, E. (2011) Simulated interaction and communication skills training: the ‘conversation-analytic role-play method’. In C. Antaki (ed.) Applied Conversation Analysis 119–39. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Suro, R. (1990) Z?nis’ effort to regain idols may alter views of Indian art. New York Times (13 August): A1, A13.
Trinder, L. and Kellett, J. (2007) Fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in court-based dispute resolution schemes in England. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21(3): 323–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm009
Welsh, N. A. (2011) Current transitional state of court-connected ADR. Marquette Law Review 95(3): 873–86.