Purpose in practice

Exploring common ground across different mediation contexts

Authors

  • Lesley Allport Independent mediator

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/mtp.20712

Keywords:

practice, purpose, context, sector, ideology, settlement, empowerment, conflict end, communication, relationship repair, resolution

Abstract

This article examines the similarities and differences of practice and purpose across all fields of mediation delivery. It outlines conclusions from research conducted as part of my PhD in 2016. I was seeking to establish how far there is an understanding of mediation, its purpose, the way it is delivered and the principles by which it is governed that would be recognised and shared by mediators regardless of the context. My conclusions are based on findings from interviews with practitioners working across a variety of sectors. They reveal that mediation achieves multiple purposes which can be organised into themes including: ‘empowerment’, ‘ending the conflict’, ‘improving communication’, ‘relationship repair’, ‘resolving issues’ and ‘settlement’. While context does influence outcome, these purposes were not exclusive of one another: In fact, the central question is more to do with finding an appropriate starting place for discussions. I concluded that mediation is first and foremost a party-led process and this is a key factor in defining its purpose in any context.

Author Biography

Lesley Allport, Independent mediator

Dr Lesley Allport has a long career as a mediation practitioner spanning the last 32 years. Working initially as a family mediator in the 1980’s, she has been involved in developing new areas of practice such as special educational needs mediation and disability conciliation. She mediates conflicts within families, workplace disputes and education settings as well as having experience in community mediation and cross border child abduction cases. Lesley delivers foundation mediation training in several contexts and offers advanced training for supervisors and mediators working directly with children, both in the UK and abroad. She has a keen interest in developing professional standards. She served as vice chair of the College of Mediators and chaired the Professional Standards Committee from 2015 to 2018. Lesley’s academic interest in mediation began in 2005 with a European Masters’ Degree, as part of which she developed a model of supervision specific to mediation. In 2016 she successfully completed her PhD with the Birmingham Law School examining the comparative growth of mediation and investigating core aspects of mediation practice operating across all sectors.

References

Acland, A. (1990) A Sudden Outbreak of Common Sense. London: Hutchinson Business Books.

Allport, L. (2016a) Delivering justice: do mediators and lawyers speak the same language? In G. Tessuto et al. (eds) Constructing Legal Discourse and Social Practices: Issues and Perspectives 191–208. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Allport, L. (2016b) Exploring the common ground in mediation. PhD dissertation, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham. Retrieved on 29 April 2021 from https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/6746/1/Allport16PhD.pdf.

Allport, L. (2020) Square pegs and round holes: the divergent roles of lawyers and mediators. In M. F. Moscati, M. Palmer and M. Roberts (eds) Comparative Dispute Resolution 190–201. Gloucester: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Allport, L. (2021) Mediation: alternative? Or a first choice for resolving disputes. Amicus Curiae: The Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies 2(2): 151–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2i2.5251

Auerbach J. S. (1983) Justice Without Law: Resolving Disputes Without Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press,

Avruch, K. (1988) Culture and Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

Bowling, D. and Hoffman, D. (2003) Bringing Peace into the Room: How the Personal Qualities of the Mediator Impact the Process of Conflict Resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bush, R. and Folger, J. P. (2005) The Promise of Mediation, 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Canyameres, M. and Salberg, A.C. (2011) Historical contribution to the ethical and methodological principles of mediation. In J. Faget (ed.) Mediation in Political Conflicts: Soft Power or Counter Culture? 31–44. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Cloke, K. (2003) What are the personal qualities of a mediator? In D. Bowling and D. Hoffman (eds). Bringing Peace into the Room: How the Personal Qualities of the Mediator Impact the Process of Conflict Resolution 49–56. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cloke, K. and Goldsmith, J. (2005) Resolving Conflicts at Work: Eight Strategies for Everyone on the Job, 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Davies, W. and Fouracre, P. (eds) (1986) The Settlement of Disputes in early Medieval Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562310

Galton, E. and Love, L. (eds) (2012) Stories Mediators Tell. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

Genn, H. (1998) The Central London County Court Pilot Mediation Scheme: Evaluation Report. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.

Genn, H. (1999) Mediation in Action: Resolving Court Disputes Without Going to Trial. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Genn, H. (2010) Judging Civil Justice: Hamlyn Lectures 2008. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192378

Gulliver, P.H. (1979) Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London: Academic Press.

Jackson, Lord. (2010) The Review of Civil Litigation Costs 2009. London: The Stationery Office.

Kolb, D. (ed.) (2001) When Talk Works: Profiles of Mediators. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lang, M. and Taylor, A. (2000) The Making of a Mediator: Developing Artistry in Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

Lederach, J. P. (2005) The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195174542.001.0001

Menkel-Meadow, C. Love, L. P. and Schneider, A. K. (2006) Mediation: Practice, Policy and Ethics. New York: Aspen Publishers.

Monk, G. and Winslade, J. (2000) Narrative Mediation: A New Approach to Conflict Resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Riskin, L. L. (1994) Mediator orientations, strategies and techniques. Alternatives to High Cost Litigation 12(9): 111–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/alt.3810120904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alt.3810120904

Riskin, L. L. (1996) Understanding mediators’ orientations, strategies and techniques: a grid for the perplexed. Harvard Negotiation Law Journal 1: 7.

Roberts, M. (2007) Developing the Craft of Mediation: Reflections on Theory and Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Roberts, S. (1993) Alternative dispute resolution and civil justice: an unresolved relationship. Modern Law Review 56: 452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02683.x

Roberts, S. (2002) Institutionalized settlement in England: a contemporary panorama. Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 10: 17.

Roberts, S. and Palmer, M. (2005) Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805295

Roebuck, D. (2000) Best to reconcile: mediation and arbitration in the ancient Greek world. Arbitration 66(4): 275.

Roebuck, D. (2002) The Charitable Arbitrator: How to Mediate and Arbitrate in Louis XIV’s France. Oxford: HOLO Books, The Arbitration Press.

Roebuck, D. (2007) The Myth of Modern Mediation. Arbitration 73(1): 105.

Shonholtz, R. (1995) Justice from Another Perspective: The Ideology and Develop­mental History of the Community Boards Program. In Merry, S.E. and Milner, N. (eds) The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States 201–38. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Thomas, G. (2009) How to do your Research Project. London: Sage Publications.

Woolf, Lord. 1996) Access to Justice: Final Report. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.

Published

2021-11-16

How to Cite

Allport, L. . (2021). Purpose in practice: Exploring common ground across different mediation contexts. Mediation Theory and Practice, 6, 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1558/mtp.20712

Issue

Section

Research Articles