Do Students have Agency?
A Sociocultural Perspective from Chinese L2 Video Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.23366Keywords:
Sociocultural Theory, Video Learning, Qualitative, Mediation, AgencyAbstract
Much research exploring the use of videos to support language learning positions videos as tools and learners as passively engaged viewers. This study reveals that when encouraged to explore authentic Chinese videos, L2 learners actively took control of their language learning based on their personal interests. The complexity of video learning calls for deeper exploration into learners’ experiences. Using socio-cultural theory perspectives of self-, other-, and social-mediation and internalization, this article depicts heritage and non-heritage university-level Chinese language learners’ agency during informal video learning. This two-year qualitative study used semi-structured interviews, stimulus recall, participant observation, and document collection. Analysis revealed these lived experiences of participants’ agentic video learning; Learners in our study demonstrated variety in terms of social support and cultural understanding helping or hindering how videos mediated their L2 learning. Teachers should therefore design video pedagogy that considers individual students’ social worlds and purposes for L2 learning.
References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30(1): 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja and A. M. Ferreira Barcelos, (eds.), Beliefs about SLA, 7–33. Dordrecht, Switzerland: Springer.
Benson, P. and Cooker, L. (2013). The Applied Linguistic Individual: Sociocultural Approaches to Identity, Agency and Autonomy. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Bueno, K. (2006). Stepping out of the comfort zone: Profiles of third-year Spanish students’ attempts to develop their speaking skills. Foreign Language Annals 39: 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02899.x
Bueno, K. A. (2009). Got film? Is it a readily accessible window to the target language and culture for your students? Foreign Language Annals 42(2): 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01023.x
Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research: An introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal 12(2): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v12i2.38
Choi, J. and Yi, Y. (2012). The use and role of pop culture in heritage language learning: A study of advanced learners of Korean. Foreign Language Annals 45(1): 110–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01165.x
Cintrón-Valentín, M., García-Amaya, L. and Ellis, N. C. (2019). Captioning and grammar learning in the L2 Spanish classroom. The Language Learning Journal 47(4): 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201812773
Coffield, F. (ed.). (2000). The Necessity of Informal Learning (Vol. 4). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Dizon, G. (2018). Netflix and L2 learning: A case study. The EuroCALL Review 26(2): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2018.9080
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 27–52. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Donato, R. and MacCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal 78(4): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/328584
Duff, P. A. (2007). Second language socialization as sociocultural theory: Insights and issues. Language Teaching 40(4): 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004508
Duff, P. A. (2013). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass and A. Mackey (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 428–444. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ferreira, M. M. and Lantolf, J. P. (2008). A concept-based approach to teaching: Writing through genre analysis. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds.), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 285–321. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing.
Fogal, G. (2017). Developing concept-based instruction, pedagogical content knowledge: Implications for teacher educators and L2 instructors. Language and Sociocultural Theory 4(1): 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.29542
Guk, I. and Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research 11(3): 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807077561
Herron, C., Corrie, C., Dubreil, S. and Cole, S. P. (2002). A classroom investigation: Can video improve intermediate-level French language students’ ability to learn about a foreign culture? The Modern Language Journal 86: 36–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1192768
Huang, T. (2017). Learners’ Experiences with Informally Learning Chinese from Watching Online Videos. Doctoral Dissertation. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
Huang, T. and Lammers, J. (2018). A qualitative inquiry of video learning by Chinese L2 learners: Learning internalization, understanding social realities, and reflecting on challenges. Chinese as a second language. The Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 53(3): 257–294. https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.18004.hua
Hubbard, P. (2019). Leveraging technology to integrate informal language learning within classroom settings. In M. Dressman and R. W. Sadler (eds.), The Handbook of Informal Language Learning, 405–419. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Istenic, A. (2021). Online learning under COVID-19: Re-examining the prominence of video-based and text-based feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development 69(1): 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09955-w
Kinginger, C. (1998). Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. The Modern Language Journal 82(4): 502–513. https://doi.org/10.2307/330221
Kozulin, A. (1990). The concept of regression and Vygotskian developmental theory. Developmental Review 10: 218–238.
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 78(4): 418–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02058.x
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2004). Sociocultural theory and second and foreign language learning: An overview of sociocultural theory. In K. van Esch and O. St. John (eds.), New Insights into Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 13–34. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Verlag.
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1): 67–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44487039. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 303–318. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory and the dialectics of L2 learner autonomy/agency. In P. Benson and L. Cooker (eds.), The Applied Linguistic Individual-Sociocultural Approaches to Identity, Agency and Autonomy, 17–31. Shiffield, UK: Equinox eBooks Publishing.
Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (eds.). (2008). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Lantolf, J. P., Poehner, M. E. and Swain, M. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development. New York: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In B. van Patten and J. Williams (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 201–224. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L. and Poehner, M. E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd ed.), 207–226. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P. and Zhang, X. (2017). Concept-based language instruction. In S. Loewen, and M. Sato (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 146–165. New York: Routledge.
Levi, T. and Poehner, M. E. (2018). Employing dynamic assessment to enhance agency among L2 learners. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner and M. Swain (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development, 295–309. New York: Routledge.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. (2011). Design qualitative research (5th Ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Negueruela, E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In R. Salaberry and B. A. Lafford (eds.), The Art of Teaching Spanish: Second Language Acquisition from Research to Praxis, 79–102. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Negueruela-Azarola, E. and García, P. N. (2016). Sociocultural theory and the language classroom. In G. Hall (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching, 313–327. New York, NY: Routledge.
Peters, M. and Romero, M. (2019). Lifelong learning ecologies in online higher education: Students’ engagement in the continuum between formal and informal learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(4): 1729–1743. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12803
Picciano, A. G. (2018). Online Education: Foundations, Planning, and Pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, UK: Sage.
Rogers, A. (2014). The Base of the Iceberg: Informal Learning and its Impact on Formal and Non-formal Learning. Opladen/Berlin/Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Science. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text, and Interaction. London: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stempleski, S. and Tomalin, B. (1990). Video in Action: Recipes for Using Video in Language Teaching. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Swain, M. and Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics: 3218–3225. https://dcdc.coe.hawaii.edu/ltec/612/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Communicative-Language-Teaching.pdf
Toffoli, D. and Perrot, L. (2017). Autonomy, the Online Informal Learning of English (OILE) and Learning Resource Centers (LRCs): The relationships between learner autonomy, L2 proficiency, L2 autonomy and digital literacy. In M. Cappellini, T. Lewis, A. R. Mompean (eds.), Learner Autonomy and Web 2.0, 198–228. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds.), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 163–186. Sheffield: Equinox.
Venter, A. (2021). Synchronising informal and formal learning spaces to facilitate collaborative online learning. Africa Education Review: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1954536
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol 1, Problem of General Psychology 37–285. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, Communication and Cognition. Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winegar, L. (1997). Can internalization be more than a magical phrase? Notes toward the constructive negotiation of this process. In B. D. Cox and C. Lightfoot (eds.), Sociogenetic Perspectives on Internalization, 25–43. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Wu, Y. (2014). Using sketch comedy skits to develop language in lower level Chinese classes. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 49(3): 65–85.
Xiao, Y. (2004). L2 acquisition of Chinese topic-prominent constructions. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 39(3): 65–84.
Xiao, Y. and Wong, K. F. (2014). Exploring heritage language anxiety: A study of Chinese heritage language learners. The Modern Language Journal 98(2): 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12085
Yoon, B. and Kim, H. K. (eds.). (2012). Teachers’ Roles in Second Language Learning: Classroom Applications of Sociocultural Theory. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
Zhang, D., Fan Y. and Du, W. (2013). Sociocultural theory applied to second language learning: Collaborative learning with reference to the Chinese context. International Education Studies 6(9): 165–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p165
Zhang, X. (2020). Testing the topic hypothesis: A concept-based teaching study. Language and Sociocultural Theory 7(1): 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.37716
