Naming, Understanding and Redeeming the A/Human Agencies with Which We Share Our World


  • Bronislaw Szerszynski Lancaster University



New Testament, technology


In this paper I argue that an important strand of ecotheology should be an articulated techno-demonology—an understanding of the ways that technologies increasingly confront us as indifferent or malign agencies. Drawing particularly on the New Testament language of spiritual agencies, I consider in turn three necessary components of techno-demonology. First, techno-demonology needs a taxonomic nomenclature, one which ‘names’ techno-demonological phenomena in a manner that reveals the specific ways in which the technologies can stand before us as autonomous powers. As a contribution to this task I distinguish between elementals (stoicheia) and powers (dynameis)—between technical systems which have become treated as ends in themselves, and have thus started to control human action, and technologies whose unanticipated side-effects overwhelm their intended purposes. Second, I suggest that techno-demonology should include an understanding of how such techno-demons arise; I thus give historical explanations for the proliferation of technological elementals and powers in the contemporary world. Finally, I argue that techno-demonology should include the redemptive task of restoring technology to its rightful place in creation.

Author Biography

  • Bronislaw Szerszynski, Lancaster University
    Senior Lecturer, Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YG, UK


Arendt, Hannah 1958 The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Bacon, Francis 1960 The Advancement of Learning, and New Atlantis (London: Oxford University Press).

Banham, Gary 2000 ‘Mourning Satan’, in Gary Banham and Charlie Blake (eds.), Evil Spirits: Nihilism and the Fate of Modernity (Manchester: Manchester University Press): 7-21.

Barth, Karl 1960 Church Dogmatics. III. The Doctrine of Creation: Part Three (trans. G.W. Bromiley and R.J. Ehrlich; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark).

Beck, Ulrich 1992 Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. Mark Ritter; London: Sage Publications).

Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor J. Pinch 1990 The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Cacciari, Massimo 1994 The Necessary Angel (trans. Miguel E. Vatter; Albany: State University of New York Press).

Daly, Robert W. 1970 ‘The Specters of Technicism’, Psychiatry 33.4: 417-32.

Ellul, Jacques 1964 The Technological Society (trans. John Wilkinson; New York: Vintage).

Fan, Mei-Fang 2004 ‘Nuclear Waste Management and Environmental Justice in Taiwan’ (PhD thesis, Lancaster University).

Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow 1994 The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (London: Sage Publications).

Goodchild, Philip 2002 Capitalism and Religion: The Price of Piety (London: Routledge).

Habermas, Jürgen 2003 The Future of Human Nature (Cambridge: Polity).

Hacking, Ian 1983 Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Hearne, Vicki 1987 Adam’s Task: Calling Animals by Name (London: Heinemann).

Heidegger, Martin 1977 ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, in Basic Writings (San Francisco: HarperCollins): 283-317.

Jaeger, Carlo 2001 Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action (London: Earthscan 2001).

Jonas, Hans 1985 Technik, Medizin Und Ethik: Zur Praxis Des Prinzips Verantwortung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).

Krohn, Wolfgang and Johannes Weyer 1994 ‘Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research’, Science and Public Policy 21.3: 173-83.

Kwan, H.S. 1989 ‘The Physical Environment and Religious Thought Among the Yami’, Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica 67: 143-75 (Chinese).

Latour, Bruno 1991 ‘Technology Is Society Made Durable’, in Law (ed.) 1991: 103-31.

‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’, in Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 225-58.

We Have Never Been Modern (trans. Catherine Porter; Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

‘From the World of Science to the World of Research?’, Science 280, 5361: 208-209.

Law, John 1991 ‘Introduction: Monsters, Machines and Societechnical Relations’, in Law (ed.) 1991: 1-23.

Law, John (ed.) 1991 A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination (London: Routledge).

McLuhan, Marshall 1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

Mitcham, Carl 1994 Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Morrison, Clinton 1960 The Powers That Be: Earthly Rulers and Demonic Powers in Romans 13, 1-7 (London: SCM Press).

Noble, David F. 1999 The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).

Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott and Michael Gibbons 2001 Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity).

Proudfoot, Wayne 1985 Religious Experience (Berkeley: University of California Press).

Ruskin, John 1908 ‘The Storm Cloud of the Nineteenth Century’, in E.T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn (eds.), The Works of John Ruskin, Vol. 34 (London: George Allen): 9-41.

Sheehan, Thomas 1981 Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker (Chicago: Precedent).

Song, Robert 2003 ‘The Human Genome Project as Soteriological Project’, in Celia Deane-Drummond (ed.) Brave New World? Theology, Ethics and the Human Genome Project (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark): 164-84.

Szerszynski, Bronislaw 2005 Nature, Technology and the Sacred (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

White, Lynn, Jr 1967 ‘The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis’, Science 155: 1203-207.

Wink, Walter 1984 Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).

Unmasking the Powers: The Invisible Forces That Determine Human Existence (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).

Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).

Winner, Langdon 1977 Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).






How to Cite

Szerszynski, B. (2006). Techno-demonology: Naming, Understanding and Redeeming the A/Human Agencies with Which We Share Our World. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 11(1), 57-75.