Thinking Globally and Thinking Locally
Ecology, Subsidiarity, and a Multiscalar Environmentalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v2i2.218Keywords:
christian environmental ethics, scale, subsidiarity, scientific ecology, environmentalism, environmental degradationAbstract
Environmentalism is a movement concerned with both the entirety of planet Earth and the very particular local places and systems of which it is comprised. This article attempts to connect a set of academic perspectives with which to understand and reflect on such scalar issues, tracking differences between the diverse scales and levels of moral attention to environmental problems. The work of ecological researchers and theorists offers a vocabulary for this task, and the writings of environmental philosopher Bryan Norton provide tools for applying such a vocabulary to moral concerns. Another important contribution comes from the Catholic principle of subsidiarity, which stresses the continuing importance of individual persons and local systems in a vast and globalizing world. Drawing on these diverse sources, this article advocates a multiscalar perspective on environmental problems, seeking to acknowledge and discern the ways different issues must be understood and approached at different scales.
References
Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a Unified Ecology (New York: Columbia University Press).
Befield, Kaid, et al. 2005. After Katrina: New Solutions for Safe Communities and a Secure Energy Future (New York: Natural Resources Defense Council).
Berry, Wendell. 1970. A Continuous Harmony: Essays Cultural and Agricultural (Washington, DC: Shoemaker & Hoard).
Columbia River Watershed Catholic Bishops. 2000. The Columbia River Watershed: Caring for Creation and the Common Good—An International Pastoral Letter by the Bishops of the Region. Online: http://www.columbiariver.org (accessed 5 March 2006).
Curran, Charles E. 1999. The Catholic Moral Tradition Today: A Synthesis (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
———. 2002. Catholic Social Teaching, 1891–Present: A Historical, Theological, and Ethical Analysis (Moral Traditions Series; Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
Daly, Herman E., and John B. Cobb, Jr. 1994. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future (Boston: Beacon Press, 2nd edn).
Evernden, Neil. 1985. The Natural Alien: Humankind and Environment (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
Forman, Richard T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Gardner, R.H. 2001. Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology (New York: Columbia University Press).
Gore, Albert. 1992. Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).
Gore, Albert, and Melcher Media. 2006. An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It (Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press).
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162: 1243-48. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature, and Culture. Online: http://www.religionandnature.com/journal/ (accessed 11 May 2007).
Kirk-Duggan, Cheryl A. (ed.). 2006. The Sky Is Crying: Race, Class, and Natural Disaster (Nashville: Abindon Press).
Komonchak, Joseph A. 1988. ‘Subsidiarity in the Church: The State of the Question’, The Jurist 48: 298-349.
Levin, Simon A. 1992. ‘The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. Macarthur Award Lecture’, Ecology 73.6: 1943-67. doi:10.2307/1941447.
Mahoney, Jack. 1988. ‘Subsidiarity in the Church’, The Month 21.11: 968-73.
Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists (New York: Oxford University Press).
———. 2003. Searching for Sustainability: Interdisciplinary Essays in the Philosophy of Conservation Biology (New York: Cambridge University Press).
———. 2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Noss, Reed. 1992. ‘Issues of Scale in Conservation Biology’, in Peggy L. Fiedler and Subodh K. Jain (eds.), Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation, and Management (New York: Chapman & Hall).
O’Brien, David J., and Thomas A. Shannon. 1992. Catholic Social Thought: The Documentary Heritage (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books).
O’Neill, R.V. 1989. ‘Perspectives in Hierarchy and Scale’, in Jonathan Roughgarden, Robert M. May, and Simon A. Levin (eds.), Perspectives in Ecological Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press): 140-56.
O’Neill, R.V., and A.W. King. 1998. ‘Homage to St. Michael; or, Why Are There So Many Books on Scale?’, in Peterson and Parker 1998: 3-16.
Peterson, David L., and V. Thomas Parker (eds.). 1998. Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications (New York: Columbia University Press).
Pope Pius XI. 1992 [1931]. Quadragesimo Anno, in David J. O’Brien and Thomas A. Shannon (eds.), Catholic Social Thought: The Documentary Heritage (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books): 40-80.
Rasmussen, Larry L. 1996. Earth Community, Earth Ethics (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books).
Schilling, Theodor. 1995. Subsidiarity as a Rule and a Principle, Or: Taking Subsidiarity Seriously (New York: Jean Monnet Center).
Schoonmaker, Peter K. 1998. ‘Paleoecological Perspectives on Ecological Scale’, in Peterson and Parker 1998: 79-103.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. 1991. Renewing the Earth: An Invitation to Reflection and Action on Environment in Light of Catholic Social Teaching (Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops). Online: http://www.usccb.org/sdwp/ejp/bishopsstatement.htm (accessed 22 August 2005).
Worldwatch Institute. 1984–2006. State of the World: A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress toward a Sustainable Society (New York: Norton).
