Collaborative Research and Co-Learning

Integrating Nuwuvi (Southern Paiute) Ecological Knowledge and Spirituality to Revitalize a Fragmented Land

Authors

  • Jeremy Spoon Portland State University
  • Richard Arnold Pahrump Paiute Tribe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v6i4.477

Keywords:

ecological knowledge, place-based spirituality, collaborative research, Nuwuvi (Southern Paiute), Great Basin

Abstract

We discuss linked Nuwuvi (Southern Paiute) ecological knowledge and place-based spirituality related to federal lands in the southern Great Basin, USA. Nuwuvi or ‘the people’ are Numic speakers who consider this area to be their ancestral homeland and a close relative since the time when the world was new. The current land holdings of these six federally and one non-federally recognized Native American nations are a fraction of the pre-contact period. The ancestral territory was fragmented and knowledge transmission hindered by gradual encroachment by settlers, reorganization onto reservations, land annexation by federal agencies, relocation to government boarding schools barring indigenous languages, and more. We present two applied interpretive and resource management projects aimed at revitalizing Nuwuvi relationships with their ancestral territory currently governed by several federal agencies. Our framework considers co-learning among indigenous peoples, federal land managers, and the general public to be vital to the revitalization process. Co-learning occurs in these projects by utilizing collaborative ethnographic methods in conducting research, integrating a variety of perspectives, creating opportunities for intergenerational knowledge transmission and interactions with ancestral lands, and enhancing government-to-government consultation and public education.

Author Biographies

Jeremy Spoon, Portland State University

Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Portland State University.

Richard Arnold, Pahrump Paiute Tribe

Chariperson, Pahrump Paiute Tribe.

References

Ahearn, L.M. 2001. ‘Language and Agency’, Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109-37. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109.

Berkes, F. 2008. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management (Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis).

Berkes, F., and N.J. Turner. 2006. ‘Knowledge, Learning, and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social-Ecological System Resilience’, Human Ecology 34.4: 479-94. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9008-2.

Borde, R.J., and A.J. Jackman. 2010. ‘The Devi as Ecofeminist Warrior: Reclaiming the Role of Sacred Natural Sites in East-Central India’, in B. Verschuuren, R. Wild, J. McNeely, and G. Oviedo (eds.), Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture (London: Earthscan): 272-79.

Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). 2005. American Indian Population and Labor Force Report (Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior).

D’Azevedo, W.L. (ed.). 1986. Handbook of North American Indians: Great Basin, vol. 11 (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution).

Dowie, Mark. 2009. Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Con

Published

2013-02-15

How to Cite

Spoon, J., & Arnold, R. (2013). Collaborative Research and Co-Learning: Integrating Nuwuvi (Southern Paiute) Ecological Knowledge and Spirituality to Revitalize a Fragmented Land. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 6(4), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v6i4.477