Forum Response

The Confines of Consecration: A Reply to Critics

Authors

  • Lisa H. Sideris Indiana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v9i2.27287

Keywords:

scientism, religion and science, evidentialism

Author Biography

Lisa H. Sideris, Indiana University

Lisa H. Sideris is Associate Professor in the Department of Religious Studies, Indiana University, and is an Associate Editor for the Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture.

References

Ashley, J. Matthew. 2010. ‘Reading the Universe Story Theologically: The Contribution of a Biblical Narrative Imagination’, Theological Studies 71.4: 870-902. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004056391007100405.

Barlow, Connie. 1997. Green Space, Green Time: The Way of Science (New York: Springer). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0673-6.

———. 2013. ‘Ritualizing Big History’. Online: http://www.metanexus.net/blog/ritualizing-big-history.

Berry, Thomas. 1988. The Dream of the Earth (San Francisco: Sierra Club Books).

———. 1999. The Great Work: Our Way into the Future (New York: Bell Tower).

———. 2009. ‘Religion in the Ecozoic Era’, in Mary Evelyn Tucker (ed.), The Sacred Universe (New York: Columbia University Press).

Berry, Wendell. 2000. Life Is a Miracle: An Essay against Modern Superstition (Washington, DC: Counterpoint).

Callicott, J. Baird. 2002. ‘Myth and Environmental Philosophy’, in Kevin Schilbrack (ed.), Thinking Through Myths: Philosophical Perspectives (New York: Routledge): 158-73. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203398449_chapter_8.

Crist, Eileen. 2013. ‘On the Poverty of Our Nomenclature’, Environmental Humanities 3: 129-47.

Crouch, Robert A., Richard B. Miller, and Lisa H. Sideris. 2006. ‘Intelligent Design, Science Education, and Public Reason’. The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions Indiana University. Online: http://poynter.indiana.edu/

Downloads

Published

2015-08-29

How to Cite

Sideris, L. H. (2015). Forum Response: The Confines of Consecration: A Reply to Critics. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 9(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v9i2.27287