Religion Scholarship on Indigenous Lands

Research, Relationship, and the Potential of Engaged Scholarship

Authors

  • Abel R Gomez Texas Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.25258

Keywords:

Native American, Indigenous, California, Ethnography, Relationship, sacred sites

Abstract

What does engaged scholarship on religion look like in the context of ongoing occupation of Indigenous lands? This article enters this conversation by examining research as fundamentally relational. Drawing on Shawn Wilson’s model of ‘research as ceremony’, the author argues that a move toward engaged scholarship is a move toward understanding the ways in which Scholar and the community the scholar works with are embedded in relationship as well as the importance of ongoing self-reflection on one’s place in community. Engaged scholarship, therefore, is rooted in awareness of relationships, contributions to relationships, and, ultimately, is invested in strengthening relationships. The author turns to his ethnographic experiences with Ohlone tribes in the San Francisco and Monterey areas to examine ways this could look on the ground with particular communities. The article concludes by exploring the position of scholar as respectful ‘guest’ and the possibility of more intimate connections as a ‘relative’.

References

Akins, Damon B., and William J. Bauer Jr. 2021. We Are the Land: A History of Native California (Berkeley: University of California Press).

Arnold, Philip P. n.d. The Urgency of Indigenous Religions. Unpublished manuscript. Syracuse University.

Arvin, Malie, Eve Tuck, and Angie Morill. 2013. ‘Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy’, Feminist Formations 25.1: 8–34.

Barker, Joanne. 2019. ‘Confluence: Water as an Analytic of Indigenous Feminisms’, American Indian Culture and Research Journal 43.3: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.17953/AICRJ.43.3.BARKER

Bean, Lowell John (ed.). 1994. The Ohlone Past and Present: Native Americans of the San Francisco Bay Region (Menlo Park: Ballena Press).

Bear, Lindsie (ed.). 2014/2015. Saying Our Share: Surviving the Missions [Special issue]. News from Native California 28.2.

Behar, Ruth. 1997. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart (Boston: Beacon Press).

Beliso-De Jesús, Aisha M. 2018. ‘Confounded Identities: A Meditation on Race, Feminism, and Religious Studies in Times of White Supremacy’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 86.2: 307–40.

‘Chairman Lopez to speak at UN about Juristac’. 2018. Amah Mutsun Land Trust. https://www.amahmutsunlandtrust.org/new-page-2

Clinger, Janet, and Ruth Morgan. 2014. ‘Ohlone Elders and Youth Speak: Restoring a California Legacy’, Community Works West.

Cordero, Jonathan. 2014. ‘Missionized California Indian Futures’, News from Native California 28.2: 63.

Costo, Rupert, and Jeannette Henry Costo (eds). 1987. The California Missions: A Legacy of Genocide (San Francisco: Indian Historian Press).

Crawford, Suzanne J., and Dennis Kelley. 2005. ‘Academic Study of American Indian Religious Traditions’, in S. Crawford and D. Kelly (eds.) American Indian Religious Traditions: An Encyclopedia (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO): 1–10.

Deloria, Vine. 1988. Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

Eliade, Mircea. 1961. ‘History of Religion and a New Humanism’, History of Religions 1.1: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/462437

Estes, Nick. 2019. Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock Versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance (New York: Verso).

Field, Les. 2008. Abalone Tales: Collaborative Explorations of Sovereignty and Identity in Native California (Durham: Duke University Press).

———. 2003. ‘Unacknowledged Tribes, Dangerous Knowledge: The Muwekma Ohlone and How Indian Identities Are “Known”’, Wicazo Sa Review 18.2: 79–94.

Field, Les, Alan Leventhal, Dolores Sanchez, and Rosemary Cambra. 1994. ‘A Contemporary Ohlone Tribal Revitalization Movement: A Perspective From the Muwekma Costanoan/Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area’, California History 7.3: 412–31.

Fong, K. (2022). ‘“Scientific Racism”: Campus Works to Repatriate Indigenous Remains’, The Daily Californian. https://www.dailycal.org/2022/09/14/scientific-racism-campus-works-to-repatriate-indigenous-remains

Gomez, Abel R. 2021. ‘Postapocalyptic Communities: Tribal and Religious Organizations Respond to COVID-19’, The Revealer. https://therevealer.org/postapocalyptic-communities-tribal-and-religious-organizations-respond-to-covid-19/

———. 2023. ‘“We Survived This”: California Missions, Colonialism, and Indigenous Belonging’, Political Theology 24.7: 632–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623 17X.2023.2224541

Har, Janie. 2024. ‘Ohlone People Rejoice After City of Berkeley Votes to Return Sacred Land’, KQED. https://www.kqed.org/news/11979268/ohlone-people-rejoice-after-city-of-berkeley-votes-to-return-sacred-land-to-tribe

Harjo, Laura. 2019. Spiral to the Stars: Mvskoke Tools of Futurity (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press).

Hart, E. Richard. 2003. ‘Federal Recognition of Native American Tribes: The Case of California’s Amah Mutsun’, Western Legal History 16.1: 39–84.

Johnson, Greg. 2014. ‘Off the Stage, On the Page: On the Relationship between Advocacy and Scholarship’, Religion 44.2: 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048 721X.2014.888027

Karwec, Patty. 2022. Becoming Kin: An Indigenous Call to Unforgetting the Past and Reimagining Our Future (Minneapolis: Broadleaf Books).

Kelley, Dennis. 2015. Tradition, Performance, and Religion in Native America: Ancestral Ways, Modern Selves (New York: Routledge).

Laverty, Philip. 2003. ‘The Ohlone/Costanoan-Esselen Nation of Monterey, California: Dispossession, Federal Neglect, and the Bitter Irony of the Federal Acknowledgment Process’, Wicazo Sa Review 18.2: 41–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2003.0015

Lawless, Elaine J. 2000. ‘“Reciprocal” Ethnography: No One Said It Was Easy’, Journal of Folklore Research 37.2/3: 197–205.

Liboiron, Max. 2021. Pollution is Colonialism (Durham: Duke University Press).

Lightfoot, Kent, and Valentin Lopez. 2013. ‘The Study of Indigenous Management Practices in California: An Introduction’, California Archeology 5.1: 209–19.

Lincoln, Bruce. 2012. Gods and Demons, Priests and Scholars: Critical Explorations in the History of Religions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Long, Charles H. 1995. Significations: Signs, Symbols, and Images in the Interpretation of Religion (Aurora: The Davies Group, Publishers).

Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde (Freedom: The Crossing Press).

Madley, Benjamin. 2016. An American Genocide (New Haven: Yale University Press).

———. 2019. ‘California’s First Mass Incarceration System: Franciscan Missions, California Indians, and Penal Servitude, 1769–1836’, Pacific Historical Review 88.1: 14–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2019.88.1.14

McKenzie, Mia. (2017). ‘No More “Allies”’, Black Girl Dangerous. https://www. blackgirldangerous.com/2013/09/no-more-allies/

Milliken, Randall, Laurence Shoup, and Beverly Ortiz. 2009. Ohlone/Costanoan Indians of the San Francisco Peninsula and their Neighbors, Yesterday and Today (San Francisco: National Park Service Gold Gate National Recreation Area).

Miranda, Deborah. 2013. Bad Indians: A Tribal Memoir (Berkeley: Heyday).

Nelson, Peter. 2021. ‘Where Have All the Anthros Gone? The Shift in California Indian Studies from Research “on” to Research “with, for, and by” Indigenous Peoples’, American Anthropologist 123: 469–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13633

Olupona, Jacob K. 2014. ‘Preface’ in K. Olupona (ed.) Beyond Primitivism: Indigenous Religious Traditions and Modernity (New York: Routledge): xiv–xvi.

Panich, Lee M. 2021. Narratives of Persistence: Indigenous Negotiations of Colonialism in Alta and Baja California (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).

Pesantubbee, Michelene E. 2003. ‘Religious Studies on the Margins: Decolonizing our Minds’ in R. Grouds, G. Tinker, and D. Wilkins (eds.) Native Voices: American Indian Identity and Resistance (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press): 209–22.

Rawls, James J. 1984. Indians of California: The Changing Image (Norman: University of California Press).

Rizzo, Martin. 2022. We Are Not Animals: Indigenous Politics of Survival, Rebellion, and Reconstitution in Nineteenth-Century California (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

Sepulveda, Charles. 2018. ‘Our Sacred Waters: Theorizing Kuuyam as a Decolonial Possibility’, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 7.1: 40–58.

Simpson, Audra. 2014. Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States (Durham: Duke University Press).

Simpson, Leanne. B. 2019. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

Smith, Jonathan Z. 1992. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2013. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (New York: Zed Books).

Tallbear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

———. 2014. ‘Standing With and Speaking as Faith: A Feminist-Indigenous Approach to Inquiry’, Journal of Research Practice 10.2: N17.

Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2012. ‘Decolonization is Not a Metaphor’, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1.1: 1–40.

Wilson, Shawn. 2008. Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods (Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing).

Women’s Earth Alliance and Native Youth Sexual Health Network. 2016. Violence on the Land, Violence on our Bodies: Building an Indigenous Response to Environmental Violence. http://landbodydefense.org/uploads/files/VLVBReportToolkit2016.pdf

Published

2024-07-03

Issue

Section

Special Issue - Publicly Engaged Scholarship

How to Cite

Gomez, A. R. (2024). Religion Scholarship on Indigenous Lands: Research, Relationship, and the Potential of Engaged Scholarship. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 18(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.25258