Toxic Desecration

Indigenous Knowledge and ‘Western’ Science in Defense of Sacred Land


  • Adam Dunstan University of North Texas



Sacred sites, environmentalism, sacred ecology, indigenous knowledge, hybrid knowledge, science talk, desecration


In studies of Native American knowledge, the sacred ecologies of Indigenous people are often contrasted with (allegedly secular) Western science. Other scholars have challenged this binary, sometimes under a model of ‘hybrid knowledge’ wherein Indigenous knowledge is ‘integrated’ into settler conservation. I argue for a different model, wherein unique expressions of sacred ecological knowledge emerge from the ground up within environmental activism. Drawing on ethnographic research with Protect the Peaks, a movement to halt expansion of a ski resort on an Arizona mountain sacred to thirteen Indigenous nations, I show how, in Protect the Peaks’ public messages, ceremonial standards and scientific studies are utilized to highlight snowmaking as a form of toxic desecration. This discourse, coupled with presenting snowmaking as a threat to health, ecosystems, and sacredness simultaneously, is an articulation of Indigenous knowledge which presents a direct critique to hegemonic distinctions of culture/nature and sacred/secular in policy and scholarship.


th Circuit Court. 2008. Navajo Nation v. USFS. 9th Circuit Court Appeal en banc (2007–2008). 535 F. 3d 1058, 1063.

Agrawal, A. 1995. ‘Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge’, Development and Change 26.3: 413-39. Doi:

Barker, J. 2005. Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-determination (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press). Doi:

Basso, K. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press).

Berkes, F. 1993. ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Perspective’, in J.T. Inglis (ed.), Traditional Ecological Knowledge Concepts and Cases (Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge): 1-10. Doi:

———. 2012. Sacred Ecology (New York: Routledge).

Berkes, F., C. Folke, and M. Gadgil. 1995. ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Biodiversity, Resilience and Sustainability’, Ecology, Economy, and Environment 4: 281-99. Doi:

Boggs, K. 2017. ‘The Material-Discursive Spaces of Outdoor Recreation: Rhetorical Exclusion and Settler Colonialism at the Arizona Snowbowl Ski Resort’, JSRNC 11.2: 175-96. Doi:

Cajete, G. 2018. ‘Native Science and Sustaining Indigenous Communities’, in M.K. Nelson and D. Shilling (eds.), Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 15-26. Doi:

Casas-Cortés, M.I., M. Osterweil, and D.E. Powell. 2008. ‘Blurring Boundaries: Recognizing Knowledge-Practices in the Study of Social Movements’, Anthropological Quarterly 81.1: 17-58. Doi:

Chidester, D., and E.T. Linenthal. 1995. ‘Introduction’, in D. Chidester and E.T. Linenthal (eds.), American Sacred Space (Bloomington: Indiana University Press): 1-42.

Cladis, M.S. 2019. ‘Sacred Sites as a Threat to Environmental Justice? Environmental Spirituality and Justice Meet among the Diné (Navajo) and Other Indigenous Groups’, Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 23.2: 132-53. Doi:

Conklin, B., and L.R. Graham. 1995. ‘The Shifting Middle Ground: Amazonian Indians and Eco-Politics’, American Anthropologist 97.4: 695-710. Doi:

Cruikshank, J. 2005. Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters, and Social Imagination (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).

Davy, B.J., and S. Quilley. 2018. ‘Ritual Matters: Changing Ontologies, Values, and Ecological Conscience Formation’, JSRNC 12.4: 384-418. Doi:

Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

Deloria, V.J. 1973. God is Red: A Native View of Religion (New York: The Putnam Publishing Group).

Denetdale, J. 2013. ‘The Value of Oral History on the Path to Diné/Navajo Sovereignty’, in L. Lee (ed.), Diné Perspectives: Revitalizing and Reclaiming Navajo Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press): 68-82.

———. 2016. ‘No Explanation, No Resolution, and No Answers: Border Town Violence and Navajo Resistance to Settler Resistance’, Wicazo Sa Review 31.3: 111-31. Doi:

Dougherty, J. 2005. ‘Sacred Hypocrisy’, Phoenix New Times. Online:

Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

Dunstan, A. 2016. ‘Toxic Desecration: Science and the Sacred in Navajo Environmentalism’ (PhD diss., University at Buffalo).

———. 2017. ‘Legislative Ambiguity and Ontological Hierarchy in US Sacred Land Law’, American Indian Culture and Research Journal 41.4: 23-43. Doi:

———. 2019. ‘Victims of “Adaptation”: Climate Change, Sacred Mountains, and Perverse Resilience’, Journal of Political Ecology 26.1: 704-19. Doi:

Forsyth, T. 1996. ‘Science, Myth and Knowledge: Testing Himalayan Environmental Degradation in Thailand’, Geoforum 27.3: 375-92. Doi:

Gee, J. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (New York: Taylor & Francis).

Gilio-Whitaker, D. 2019. As Long as Grass Grows: The Indigenous Fight for Environmental Justice, from Colonization to Standing Rock (Boston: Beacon Press).

Glowacka, M., D. Washburn, and J. Richland. 2009. ‘Nuvataukya’ovi, San Francisco Peaks: Balancing Western Economies with Native American Spiritualities’, Current Anthropology 50.4: 547-61. Doi:

Grim, J. 2001. ‘Introduction’, in J. Grim (ed.), Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The Interbeing of Cosmology and Community (Cambridge: Harvard University Press): xxii-lxiv.

Haenn, N. 2002. ‘Nature Regimes in Southern Mexico: A History of Power and Environment’, Ethnology 41.1: 1-26. Doi:

Haenn, N., B. Shmook, Y. Reyes, and S. Calmé. 2014. ‘Improving Conservation Outcomes with Insights from Local Experts and Bureaucrats’, Conservation Biology 28.4: 951-58. Doi:

Hornborg, A. 2006. ‘Animism, Fetishism, and Objectivism as Strategies for Knowing (or Not Knowing) the World’, Ethnos 71.1: 21-32. Doi:

Indigenous Action. 2013. ‘Protect the Peaks Coconino Forest Service Office Sept. 21, 2012—Stop Snowbowl, Protect Sacred Sites!’. Online:

Johnson, J.A., and B. Murton. 2007. ‘Re/placing Native Science: Indigenous Voices in Contemporary Constructions of Nature’, Geographical Research 45.2: 121-29. Doi:

Kim, E.A., A. Ashgar, and S. Jordan. 2017. ‘A Critical Review of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in Science Education’, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education 17.4: 258-370. Doi:

Kimmerer, R.W. 2002. ‘Weaving Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Biological Education: A Call to Action’, BioScience 52.5: 432-38. Doi:[0432:WTEKIB]2.0.CO;2.

———. 2013. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants (Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions).

Kohn, E. 2013. How Forests Think: Towards an Anthropology Beyond the Human (Berkeley: University of California Press). Doi:

Lagasse, B.R. 2008. ‘Waiting for the Snow to Fall: First Nations, Federal Policy, and Environmental Justice’ (MA thesis, Social Sciences: Environment and Community, Humboldt State University).

Lee, L. 2014. ‘Introduction’, in L. Lee (ed.), Diné Perspectives: Revitalizing and Reclaiming Navajo Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press): 3-13.

Lyver, P.O., C. Jones, and H. Moller. 2009. ‘Looking Past the Wallpaper: Considerate Evaluation of Traditional Environmental Knowledge by Science’, Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 39.4: 219-23. Doi:

McGregor, D. 2005. ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge: An Anishnabe Woman’s Perspective’, Atlantis 29.2: 103-109.

McPherson, R.S. 1992. Sacred Land, Sacred View: Navajo Perceptions of the Four Corners Region (Provo: Charles Redd Center for Western Studies).

Menzies, C.R., and C. Butler. 2006. ‘Introduction: Understanding Ecological Knowledge’, in C.R. Menzies (ed.), Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press): 1-17.

Minard, A. 2016. ‘San Francisco Peaks Settlement between Hopi and Flagstaff Comes Under Fire’, The Arizona Daily Sun. 10 March. Online:

Minnis, P.E., and W.J. Elisens (eds.). 2000. Biodiversity and North America (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

Morman, T.A. 2018. Many Nations under Many Gods: Public Land Management and American Indian Sacred Sites (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

Morrison, K.M. 2000. ‘The Cosmos as Intersubjective: Native American Other-than-Human Persons’, in G. Harvey (ed.), Indigenous Religions: A Companion (London: Cassell): 23-36.

Muller, S. 2004. ‘Contaminants Dog City’s Recycled Water’, The Arizona Daily Sun. 25 March. Online:

Nadasdy, P. 1999. ‘The Politics of TEK: Power, Knowledge, and the “Integration” of Knowledge’, Arctic Anthropology 36.1: 1-18.

Navajo Nation Council. 2002. ‘Diné Bi Beenahaz’áanii (‘Fundamental Laws of the Diné’)’ 1 N.N.C. §§ 201-206.

Navajo Nation Council. 2009. ‘Resolution of the Navajo Nation Council: An Action Relating to an Emergency; Affirming the Navajo Nation’s Opposition to the Desecration of Dook’o’oslííd (San Francisco Peaks) and Urging Active Participation by the Administration of President Obama to Fulfill President Obama’s Commitments and the United States’ Obligations to the Navajo Nation and All First Americans’. CAP-16-09.

Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission. 2015. ‘Petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights submitted by The Navajo Nation against The United States of America’.

Nelson, M.K. 2014. ‘Indigenous Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Persistence in Place’, in R. Warrior (ed.), The World of Indigenous North America (New York: Routledge): 214-40.

Nelson, M.K., and D. Shilling (eds.). 2018. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Leaning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Doi:

Pinxten, R., I. Van Dooren, and F. Harvey. 1983. Anthropology of Space: Explorations into the Natural Philosophy and Semantics of the Navajo (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

Powell, D.E., and A. Curley. 2008. ‘K’e, Hozhó, and Non-governmental Politics on the Navajo Nation: Ontologies of Difference Manifest in Environmental Activism’, World Anthropologies Network E-Journal 4.

Propper, C.A. 2005. ‘The Study of Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds: Past Approaches and New Directions’, Integrative and Comparative Biology 45.1: 194-200. Doi:

Protect the Peaks. n.d. ‘Facts’, Online:

Pruden, A., M. O’Brien, M. Mazzochette, and N. Fahrenfeld. 2012. ‘Antibiotic Resistance Gene Testing of Recycled Water Samples. Summary Report to Dr. Robin Silver’.

Ranco, D. 2007. ‘The Ecological Indian and the Politics of Representation: Critiquing the Ecological Indian in the Age of Ecocide’, in M.E. Harkin and D.R. Lewis (eds.), Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press): 32-51.

Rosaldo, R. 2005. ‘Introduction’, in N.G. Canclini, Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press): xi-xiii.

Sable, T., G. Howell, D. Wilson, and P. Penashue. 2007. ‘The Ashkui Project: Linking Western Science and Innu Environmental Knowledge in Creating a Sustainable Environment’, in P. Stilltoe (ed.), Local Science vs. Global Science: Approaches in Indigenous Knowledge in International Development (New York: Berghahn Books): 109-28.

Schwarz, M.T. 2008. ‘I Choose Life’: Navajo Perspectives on Medical and Religious Pluralism (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

Scott, C. 1996. ‘Science for the West, Myth for the Rest? The Case of James Bay Cree Knowledge Construction’, in L. Nader (ed.), Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiries into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge (New York: Routledge): 69-86.

Sillitoe, P. 2007. ‘Local Science vs. Global Science: An Overview’, in P. Sillitoe (ed.), Local Science vs. Global Science: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge in International Development (New York: Berghahn Books): 1-22.

Simpson, A. 2016. ‘Consent’s Revenge’, Cultural Anthropology 31.3: 326-33. Doi:

Singleton, B. 2016. ‘Love-iathan, the Meat-whale, and Hidden People: Ordering Faroese Pilot Whaling’, Journal of Political Ecology 23.1: 26-38. Doi:

Taylor, B. 2005. Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature (London: Continuum).

Tedlock, D., and B. Mannheim (eds.). 1995. The Dialogic Emergence of Culture (Champaign: University of Illinois Press).

Thomas, D.S.G., and C. Twyman. 2004. ‘Good or Bad Rangeland? Hybrid Knowledge, Science, and Local Understandings of Vegetation Dynamics in the Kalihari’, Land Degradation and Development 15: 215-31. Doi:

US Census Bureau. 2019. ‘QuickFacts: Flagstaff city, Arizona’. Online:

US Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. 2012 Guidelines for water reuse (Washington, D.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency).

Verma, P., K. Vaughan, K. Martin, E. Pulitano, J. Garrett, and D.D. Piirto. 2016. ‘Integrating Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science into Forestry, Natural Resources, and Environmental Programs’, Journal of Forestry 114.6: 648-55. Doi:

Werito, V. 2014. ‘Understanding Hózhó to Achieve Critical Consciousness: A Contemporary Diné Interpretation of the Philosophical Principles of Hózhó’, in L. Lee (ed.), Diné Perspectives: Revitalizing and Reclaiming Navajo Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press): 24-38.

Whyte, K.P. 2013. ‘On the Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as a Collaborative Concept: A Philosophical Study’, Ecological Processes 2:7: 1-12. Doi:

Wilson, Joseph A.P. (2018). ‘North American Indigenous Afterlife Beliefs’, in Christopher Moreman (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Death and Dying (London: Routledge): 184-93. Doi:

Wise, J.M. 2017. ‘Assemblage’, in L. Ouellette and J. Gray (eds.), Keywords for Media Studies (New York: New York University Press): 16-17. Doi:

Wolfgram, M. 2016. ‘Science Talk and Scientific Reference’, Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 33-34. Doi:






How to Cite

Dunstan, A. . (2022). Toxic Desecration: Indigenous Knowledge and ‘Western’ Science in Defense of Sacred Land. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 15(4), 462-486.