Back in Business

Authors

  • Leonardo Ambasciano Managing Editor, Journal of Cognitive Historiography
  • Nickolas P. Roubekas University of Vienna, Department of Religious Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.36721

Keywords:

Science, Postmondernism, Cognitive Science of Religion, Religious Studies

Author Biographies

  • Leonardo Ambasciano, Managing Editor, Journal of Cognitive Historiography
      Leonardo Ambasciano earned his Ph.D. in Historical Studies at the University of Turin (Italy) in 2014 with a cognitive and evolutionary analysis of the ancient Roman cult of Bona Dea. In 2016 he was Visiting Lecturer of Religious Studies at Masaryk University, Brno (Czech Republic). He is the author of Sciamanesimo senza sciamanesimo. Le radici intellettuali del modello sciamanico di Mircea Eliade: evoluzionismo, psicoanalisi, te(le)ologia (Rome: Nuova Cultura, 2014), “Cognitive Study of (Ancient) Religions” (inTheorizing ‘Religion’ in Antiquity, edited by N. P. Roubekas, Sheffield and Oakville, CT: Equinox, 2018), An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-Truth, and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge (London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2019), and of various articles, chapters, and book reviews. Together with Nickolas P. Roubekas, he is also Managing Editor of the Journal of Cognitive Historiography.
  • Nickolas P. Roubekas, University of Vienna, Department of Religious Studies

    Nickolas P. Roubekas is Assistant Professor in Religious Studies. He holds a B.A. in Theology (2003), an M.A. in Religious Studies (2006), an M.Res. in Social Anthropology of Religion (2009), and a Ph.D. in Religious Studies (2011). Before joining the Department, he held teaching and research positions at the University of South Africa (Pretoria, ZA), the University of Aberdeen (U.K.), and the North-West University (Potchefstroom, ZA). His main areas of research are the study of Graeco-Roman Religions and Christian Origins, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, the Academic Study of Myth, Ancient and Modern Theories of Religion, and the disciplinary conjunction of Religious Studies and Classics. He is a member of the editorial board of the book series "Studies in Ancient Religion and Culture" published by Equinox Pub., U.K., and, since 2017, Managing Editor of the Journal of Cognitive Historiography. He is a member of the American Academy of Religion (AAR), the North American Association for the Study of Religion (NAASR), the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL), and the New Testament Society of South Africa (NTSSA). 

References

Christian, David. 2010. “The Return of Universal History”. History and Theory (49)4: 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00557.x

Davies, E. Brian. 2010. Why Beliefs Matter: Reflections on the Nature of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eidinow, Esther, and Luther H. Martin. 2014. “Editors’ Introduction”. Journal of Cognitive Historiography 1(1): 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.v1i1.5

Feyerabend, Paul K. 1993. Against Method. Third Edition. Originally published in 1975. London: Verso.

Frankfurt, Harry G. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Larson, Jennifer. 2016. Understanding Greek Religion. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647012

Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123

Martin, Luther H. 2014. Deep History, Secular Theory: Historical and Scientific Studies of Religion. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614515005

Mayr, Ernst. 2004. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617188

Momigliano, Arnaldo. 1981. “The Rhetoric of History and the History of Rhetoric: On Hayden White’s Tropes”. In Comparative Criticism. Volume 3: A Yearbook, ed. E. S. Shaffer, 259–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pigliucci, Massimo. 2016. “Was Feyerabend Right in Defending Astrology? A Commentary on Kidd”. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5(5): 1–6. http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-2Vs (accessed: 20 May, 2018).

Sagan, Carl. 1996. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Ballantine Books.

Smail, Daniel L. 2008. On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

Sokal, Alan. 2010. Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Originally published in 2008. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

White, Hayden. 2014. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Fortieth Anniversary Edition. Originally published in 1973. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

Wyatt, Frederick. 1961. “A Psychologist Looks at History”. Journal of Social Issues 17(1): 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1961.tb01664.x

Downloads

Published

2018-12-04

How to Cite

Ambasciano, L., & Roubekas, N. P. (2018). Back in Business. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 4(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.36721