“Magical thinking” and the Emergence of New Social Movements

Cognitive Aspects of Reformation Era Debates over Ritual Efficacy

Authors

  • Ann Taves University of California at Santa Barbara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.v1i2.17275

Keywords:

Eucharist, magic, non-ordinary powers, Reformation, ritual, social movements.

Abstract

Sørensen’s (2007) cognitive theory of magic offers more precise tools for analysing the cognitive dimensions of novelty and change across a range of cultural domains if we extract it from academic discussions of “religion” and “magic” and recast it generically in terms of the attribution of non-ordinary powers within temporally structured event-frames. Focusing on the agreements required to generate new collective rituals reveals the chief limitation of Sørensen’s theory of magic and Lawson and McCauley’s theory of ritual for understanding the emergence of new groups with new rituals: neither attends sufficiently to the contestations surrounding the interpretation of presumed originatory events, either when the original attributions are made or when “reformers” reanalyse them. Reformation Era debates over the Eucharist illustrate how subtle shifts in the interpretation of originatory events can signal critical shifts in counterpart connections that in turn lay the foundation for new movements based on new or “reformed” rituals. Although the historical interactions that lead to or preclude such agreements are the basic “stuff” of historical analysis, use of cognitive tools to describe underlying shifts provides a more adequate basis for comparing processes of emergence within and across cultures and time periods.

Author Biography

Ann Taves, University of California at Santa Barbara

Ann Taves is Professor of Religious Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara.

References

Atkin, A. 2006. “Peirce's Theory of Signs”. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/#Int

Bechtel, W. 2009. Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Psychology Press.

Bechtel, W., and R. C. Richardson. 2000. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bynum, C. W. 2011. Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

Calvin, J. 1960. Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion. 2 vols., ed. J. T. McNeill. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.

Cameron, E. 2011. Enchanted Europe: Superstition, Reason, and Religion, 1250–1750. New York: Oxford University Press.

Craver, C. 2007. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299317.001.0001

Davies, P. S. 2009. Subjects of the World: Darwin’s Rhetoric and the Study of Agency in Nature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226137643.001.0001

Eliade, M. 1987. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt.

Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Janse, W. 2009. “The Sacraments”. In The Calvin Handbook, ed. H. J. Selderhuis. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 344–55.

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lawson, E. T., and R. N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Luhrmann, T. M. 1989. Persuasions of the Witch’s Craft: Ritual Magic in Contemporary England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Luther, M. 1959. Word and Sacrament II [LW2]. In Luther’s Works, vol. 36, ed. A. R. Wentz. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.

—1961. Word and Sacrament III [LW3]. In Luther’s Works, vol. 37, ed. R. H. Fischer. Philadelphia, PA: Muhlenberg Press.

—1971. Word and Sacrament IV [LW4]. In Luther’s Works, vol. 38, ed. M. E. Lehmann. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.

McCauley, R. N., and E. T. Lawson. 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Ritual Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606410

O’Malley, J. W. 2013. Trent: What Happened at the Council? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sharf, R. 2005. “Ritual”. In Critical Terms for the Study of Buddhism, ed. D. S. Lopez. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Sørensen, J. 2007. A Cognitive Theory of Magic. Plymouth: Altamira Press.

Stephens, W. P. 1986. The Theology of Huldrych Zwingli. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Styers, R. 2004. Making Magic: Religion, Magic, and Science in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195151070.001.0001

Taves, A. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

—2013. “Non-Ordinary Powers: Charisma, Special Affordances and the Study of Religion”. In Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, ed. D. Xygalatas and W. W. McCorkle. London: Acumen, 80–97.

Wandel, L. P. 2006. The Eucharist in the Reformation: Incarnation and Liturgy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Waterworth, J., ed. 1848. The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Ecumenical Council of Trent. London: Dolman.

Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society, trans. G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Zwingli, U. [1526] 1953. “On the Lord’s Supper”. In Zwingli and Bullinger, ed. G. W. Bromiley. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 176–238.

Published

2015-04-29

How to Cite

Taves, A. (2015). “Magical thinking” and the Emergence of New Social Movements: Cognitive Aspects of Reformation Era Debates over Ritual Efficacy. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 1(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.v1i2.17275

Issue

Section

Articles