Toward a Second Wave of Consilience in the Cognitive Scientific Study of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.v1i1.121Keywords:
cognitive science of religion, the dead, future, WEIRD societiesAbstract
As a classicist religious studies scholar and someone involved in the growing cognitive science of religion movement, I find the essays in this inaugural issue of the Journal of Cognitive Historiography exciting, despite the fact that I know little about the Graeco-Roman world. In my contribution I have been asked to make a few concluding comments, and because I do not have a special area of interest I will focus primarily on some general theoretical and methodological issues raised by the essays in this issue of the journal.
References
Bulbulia, J., and E. Slingerland. 2012. “Religious Studies As a Life Science”. Numen 59(5): 564–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341240
Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind”. Analysis 58(1): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Cohen, E. 2007. The Mind Possessed: The Cognition of Spirit Possession in an Afro-Brazilian Religious Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323351.001.0001
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fuller, R. 2007. “Spirituality in the Flesh: The Role of Discrete Emotions in Religious Life”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 75(1): 25–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfl064
Geertz, C. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Henrich, J., S. J. Heine and A. Norenzayan. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2-3): 61–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Noë, A. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pinker, S. 2008. “The Moral Instinct”. The New York Times Magazine (January 13).
Seligman, A., R. Weller, M. Puett and B. Simon. 2008. Ritual and Its Consequences: An Essay On the Limits of Sincerity. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195336009.001.0001
Shantz, C. 2010. Ecstatic Minds. In Twentieth Quinquennial Congress, International Association for the History of Religions. Toronto.
Slingerland, E. 2004. “Conceptual Metaphor Theory as Methodology for Comparative Religion”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 72(1): 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfh002
—2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body & Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slingerland, E., and M. Chudek. 2011. “The Prevalence of Mind-Body Dualism in Early China”. Cognitive Science 35: 997–1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01186.x
Slingerland, E., and M. Collard. 2012. “Creating Consilience: Toward a Second Wave”. In Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities, edited by E. Slingerland and M. Collard. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–40.
Wilson, D. S. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226901374.001.0001