Writing as Thinking in Paul’s Letters

Neurological and Cognitive Approaches to Understanding the Conceptual Differences of Paul and His Audience

Authors

  • Paul Robertson University of New Hampshire

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.38213

Keywords:

Paul’s letters, New Testament, Reading and writing, embodied cognition

Abstract

This article uses findings from cognitive sciences and neuroscience to detail the unique brain processes that stem from writing texts by hand. Such findings are described and then applied to the case of the Christian apostle Paul, whose letters – penned by Paul himself and/or via a scribe – are often used as evidence in reconstructions of early Christian social contexts. An attention to the findings from cognitive sciences and neuroscience around what I term “handwriting-thinking”, however, demonstrates a significant difference between the cognitive processes of Paul as author and the cognitive processes of his audience, who would have typically been exposed to Paul’s letters aurally. This difference in cognitive processes between Paul and his audience significantly problematizes the usage of Paul’s letters as evidence for his audience’s understanding of his letters and the concepts therein. More broadly, an attention to the embodied cognition of handwriting-thinking demonstrates differences in conceptual understandings between historical text-producers and their audiences, suggesting that we should focus more on individual text producers and their contexts instead of audiences.

Author Biography

Paul Robertson, University of New Hampshire

Paul Robertson is Lecturer in Classics and Humanities at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, USA, where he specializes in ancient Mediterranean thought and the theory of religion. Published books (2016, 2019) and articles focus on the intersection of thought systems and critical methods in the study of religion.

References

Badre, D., A. S. Kayser, and M. D’Esposito. 2010. “Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules”. Neuron 66(2): 315–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.025

Bagnall, R. 2010. Everyday Writing in the Graeco-Roman East. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520267022.001.0001

Barclay, J. M. 1987. “Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31: 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0142064X8701003105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X8701003105

Barclay, J. M. 2015. Paul and the Gift. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Baroni, M. R. 1980. “Memory for Natural Settings: Role of Diffuse and Focused Attention”. Perceptual and Motor Skills 51(3): 883–89. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.51.3.883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.51.3.883

Bazerman, C. 2012. “Writing with Concepts: Communal, Internalized, and Externalized”. Mind, Culture, and Activity 19(3): 259–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.688231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.688231

Bloom, P. 2004. Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. New York: Basic Books.

Blumell, L. H. 2012. Lettered Christians: Christians, Letters, and Late Antique Oxyrhynchus. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004180987

Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Christman S. D., R. E. Propper, and A. Dion. 2004. “Increased Interhemispheric Interaction Is Associated with Decreased False Memories in a Verbal Converging Semantic Associates Paradigm”. Brain and Cognition 56(3): 313–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.005

Ciampa, R. E., and B. S. Rosner. 2010. The First Letter to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Cipolotti, L., and E. K. Warrington. 1995. “Semantic Memory and Reading Abilities: A Case Report”. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1(1): 104–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617700000163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617700000163

Conway, M. A., and S. E. Gathercole. 1990. “Writing and Long-term Memory: Evidence for a ‘Translation’ Hypothesis”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 42(3): 513–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401235

Craik, F. I. M., and E. Tulving. 1975. “Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104(3): 268–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268

Czachesz, I. 2017. Cognitive Science and the New Testament: A New Approach to Early Christian Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198779865.001.0001

De Boer, M. C. 2011. Galatians: A Commentary. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.

DeSilva, D. A. 2018. The Letter to the Galatians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Doering, L. 2012. Ancient Jewish Letters and the Beginnings of Christian Epistolography. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-152283-3

Glover, G. H. 2011. “Overview of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagining”. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 22(2): 133–39. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.nec.2010.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2010.11.001

Gupta, N. K. 2012. “Mirror-reading Moral Issues in Paul’s Letters”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34(4): 361–81. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0142064X12442847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X12442847

Hopkins, K. 1998. “Christian Number and its Implications”. Journal of Early Christian Studies 6(2): 185–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139093552.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.1998.0035

Kay, R. H., and S. Lauricella. 2011. “Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Using Laptop Computers in Higher Education Classrooms: A Formative Analysis”. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 37(1): 1–18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ930740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21432/T2S598

Kirk, A. 2016. Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

Kounios, J., J. I. Fleck, D. L. Green, L. Payne, J. L. Stevenson, E. M. Bowden, and M. Jung-Beeman. 2008. “The Origins of Insight in Resting-state Brain Activity”. Neuro­psychologia 46(1): 281–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.013

Kwon, Y.-G. 2004. Escahtology in Galatians: Rethinking Paul’s Response to the Crisis in Galatia. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Logothetis, N. K. 2008. “What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do with fMRI”. Nature 453: 869–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06976

Luomanen, P. 2011. “Cognitive Science in Biblical Studies: An Overview”. Collegium Biblicum Arsskrift 15: 15–32.

Martin, A., and W. K. Simmons. 2008. “Structural Basis of Semantic Memory”. In Language and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Vol. 3, ed. J. H. Byrne, 113–30. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00108-X

Mattern, S. P. 2016. The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199837472.013.49

McCloskey, M., and K. Bigler. 1980. “Focused Memory in Search of Fact Retrieval. Memory and Cognition 8(3): 253–64. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197613

Menary, R. 2007. Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded. New York: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592889

Menary, R. 2007. “Writing as Thinking”. Language Sciences 29: 621–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005

Mueller, P. A., and D. M. Oppenheimer. 2014. ”The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking”. Psychological Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797614524581

Naka, M., and H. Naoi. 1995. “The Effect of Repeated Writing on Memory”. Memory and Cognition 23(2): 201–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197222

Ng, E. Y. L. 2008. “Mirror Reading and Guardians of Women in the Roman Empire”. Journal of Theological Studies 59(2): 679–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/fln051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/fln051

Oakes, P. 2015. Galatians. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Ong, W. J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064

Palermos, S. O. 2014. “Knowledge and Cognitive Integration”. Synthese 191(8): 1931–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0383-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0383-0

Pascual, L., P. Rodrigues, and D. Gallardo-Pujol1. 2013. “How Does Morality Work in The Brain? A Functional and Structural Perspective of Moral Behavior”. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 7(65). https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffnint.2013.00065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00065

Porter, S. E., and S. A. Adams (eds). 2010. Paul and the Ancient Letter Form. Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004181632.i-369

Rapcsak, S. Z., P. M. Beeson and A. B. Rubens. 1991. “Writing with the Right Hemisphere”. Brain and Language 41(4): 510–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90171-V DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90171-V

Reece, S. 2016. Paul’s Large Letters: Paul’s Autobiographic Subscriptions in the light of Ancient Epistolary Conventions. London and New York: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567669094

Reiner, M., J. D. Slotta, M. T. H. Chi, and L. B. Resnick. 2000. “Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions”. Cognition and Instruction 18(1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01

Richards, E. R. 2004. Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.

Robertson, P. 2016. Paul’s Letters and Contemporary Greco-Roman Literature: Theorizing a New Taxonomy. Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320260

Schatzki, T. R. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271023717

Schreiner, T. R. 2010. Galatians. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Shah C., K. Erhard, H. J. Ortheil, E. Kaza, C. Kessler, and M. Lotze. 2012. “Neural Correlates of Creative Writing: An fMRI Study”. Human Brain Mapping 34(5): 1088–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21493

Shantz, C. 2009. Paul in Ecstasy: The Neurobiology of the Apostle’s Life and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581625

Stowers, S. K. 2011. “The Concept of ‘Community’ and the History of Early Christianity”. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 23(3–4): 238–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006811X608377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157006811X608377

Tappenden, F. 2016. Resurrection in Paul: Cognition, Metaphor, and Transformation. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1df4gkj

Taves, A. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830978

Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 2005. “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology”. In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, ed. D.M. Buss, 5–67. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch1

Tulving, E. 2002. “Episodic Memory: From Mind to Brain”. Annual Review of Psychology 53:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114

Uro, R. 2017. “Cognitive science In the Study of Early Christianity: Why It Is Helpful – And How?” New Testament Studies 63(4): 516–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688517000182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688517000182

Weima, J. A. D. 2016. Paul the Ancient Letter Writer: An Introduction to Epistolary Analysis. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

Witherington III, B. 1998. Grace in Galatia: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Galatians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Wood, F. 1987. “Focal and Diffuse Memory Activation Assessed By Localized Indicators of CNS Metabolism: The Semantic-Episodic Memory Distinction”. Human Neurobiology 6(2): 141–51.

Yee, E. et al. (forthcoming). “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Semantic Memory”. In Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, eds. K. Oschner and S. Kosslyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zunshine, L. (ed.). 2010. Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.

Published

2022-01-06

How to Cite

Robertson, P. . (2022). Writing as Thinking in Paul’s Letters: Neurological and Cognitive Approaches to Understanding the Conceptual Differences of Paul and His Audience. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 6(1-2), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.38213

Issue

Section

Articles