A Reply to Nichols’ “The Unfulfilled Promise of Cross-Cultural, Interdisciplinary Ancient History”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.19549Keywords:
Ancient China, Ancient Greece, History, Interdisciplinary Research, PsychologyAbstract
A critical reply to Ryan Nichols’ commentary on my book The Ambivalences of Rationality: Ancient and Modern Cross-Cultural Explorations (2018) published in this issue of the Journal of Cognitive Historiography.
References
Bloom, A. 1981. The Linguistic Shaping of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henrich, J., S. J. Heine and A. Norenzayan. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Leese, M. 2018. Review of Lloyd, G. E. R., The Ambivalences of Rationality: Ancient and Modern Cross-Cultural Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2018.09.41. Available at: https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2018/2018.09.41
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2007. Cognitive Variations: Reflections on the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2018. The Ambivalences of Rationality: Ancient and Modern Cross-cultural Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108328951
Nisbett, R. E. 2003. The Geography of Thought. How Asians and Westerners Think Differently … and Why. New York: Free Press.
