Why Alex Rosenberg — and a Number of Other Philosophers — Are Wrong Just about Everything
A Commentary on Scientistic Reductionism
Keywords:Scientism, Neurobiology, Determinism, Reductionism
There is a pernicious tendency these days among some philosophers to engage in a “nothing but” attitude about important questions. According to this attitude, consciousness, volition, reason, and morality are “illusions,” “nothing but” the epiphenomena of specific neural processes. Alex Rosenberg is a particularly good (though by no means the only) illustration of this problem, which is why his work is presented and analyzed in some detail in this contribution. The general attitude displayed by Rosenberg et al. falls squarely under the rubric of “scientism,” the notion that science (however vaguely and very broadly defined) is the only reliable source of knowledge and understanding, and that all other disciplines (especially the humanistic ones) ought to bow to its dictates. The results are, predictably, incoherent and pernicious, as it is illustrated here via a number of examples.
Boudry, M. And Pigliucci, M. (eds.) 2018. Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Chen, A. 2018. “A Philosopher Explains How Our Addiction to Stories Keeps Us From Understanding History.” The Verge, 5 October. https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/5/17940650/how-history-gets-things-wrong-alex-rosenberg-interview-neuroscience-stories (last accessed 20 June 2019).
Fenton, A. A. 2015. “Coordinating with the ‘Inner GPS.’” Hippocampus 25(6):763–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22451
Fischer, J.M., R. Kane, D. Pereboom, and M. Vargas. 2009. Four Views on Free Will. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
Gregory, J. 2005. Fred Hoyle’s Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, S. 2010. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York and London: Free Press.
Laland, K. N. 2017. Darwin’s Unfinished Symphony: How Culture Made the Human Mind. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Libet, B. 1999. “Do We Have Free Will?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(8-9):47-57.
Pigliucci, M. 2011. “Science and the Is/Ought Problem.” eSkeptic, 2 February. https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-02-02/ (last accessed 20 June 2019).
Pigliucci, M. 2014. “Mind Uploading: A Philosophical Counter-analysis.” In Intelligence Unbound: The Future of Uploaded and Machine Minds, ed. R. Blackford and D. Broderick, 119-130. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736302.ch7
Pigliucci. M. 2018. “Is There a Will to Meaning?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1432(1): 63-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13877
Prabhakaran, V., B. Rypma, and J. D. E. Gabrielli. 2001. “Neural Substrates of Mathematical Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neocortical Activation During Performance of the Necessary Arithmetic Operations Test.” Neuropsychology 15(1):115-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4188.8.131.52
Rosenberg, A. 2011. The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life Without Illusions. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Co.
Rosenberg, A. 2018a How History Gets Things Wrong: The Neuroscience of Our Addiction to Stories. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
Rosenberg, A. 2018b. “Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat Than Artificial Intelligence?” 3:AM Magazine, 2 November. https://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/is-neuroscience-a-bigger-threat-than-artificial-intelligence/ (last accessed 20 June 2019).
Satel, S., and S. O. Lilienfeld. 2013. Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. New York: Basic Books.
Stuttard, D. 2018. Nemesis: Alcibiades and the Fall of Athens. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Terao, A., K. R. Koedinger, M.-H. Sohn, L. Qin, J. R. Anderson, and C. S. Carter. 2004. “An fMRI Study of the Interplay of Symbolic and Visuo-spatial Systems in Mathematical Reasoning.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 26(26):1327-1332. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3c71w0r8