Systematic Cognitive Bias in the History of Philosophy and its Cultural Transmission
A Case Study of Thomas Reid, Religion, and Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.33666Keywords:
Religion, philosophy, cognitive bias, Thomas Reid, Alvin Plantinga, philosophy of religionAbstract
This article argues influential eighteenth-century thinker Thomas Reid’s philosophical system gets infected with determinable cognitive biases when scientific claims jeopardize his core Christian commitments. These biases are most active, and led reliably to fallacious reasoning, when Reid writes about issues with implications on substance dualism and the human soul, and on the activity of supernatural agents in the material world. Falling into two halves, this article first presents cognitive biases (disconfirmation bias, motivated skepticism, selective attention), explaining the experimental context of their discovery and their sources in emotions. Next, the article walks through a series of textual case studies from published and unpublished writings that reveal the context, operation, and doxastic effects of these biases. Throughout special effort is made to empathize with Reid’s social context and its influence on his affirmation of fallacies in support of his faith.
References
Allen, R. (1999). David Hartley on human nature. Albany: State University of New York.
Anonymous. (2009). URL withheld.
Anonymous & Anonymous. (2011). URL withheld.
Anonymous & Anonymous. (2013). URL withheld.
Bacon, F., Urbach, P., Gibson, J., and Bacon, F. (1994). Novum organum?; with other parts of the great instauration. Chicago: Open Court.
Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
Batson, C. D. (1975). Rational processing or rationalization? The effect of disconfirming information on a stated religious belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076771
Bethel College. (2015, June 9). Educational Philosophy Statement on Origins. Retrieved from https://www.bethelcollege.edu/assets/content/offices/pdfs/Position%20Statement%20on%20Human%20Origins.pdf
Bolingbroke, L. V. (1841). The Philosophical Works of the Late Right Honourable Henry St. John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke (Vol. 3). Philadelphia: Carey & Hart. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/workslordboling04boligoog
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Burris, C. T., Harmon-Jones, E., and Tarpley, W. R. (1997). "By Faith Alone": Religious Agitation and Cognitive Dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1901_2
Callergård, R. (2006). An essay on Thomas Reid's philosophy of science. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Collins, A. (1711). Reflections on Mr. Clark's second defence of his letter to Mr. Dodwell (Second ed.). London: J. Darby.
Daniels, N. (1989). Thomas Reid's Inquiry: The Geometry of Visibles and The Case for Realism. Stanford: Stanford.
De Bary, P. (2002). Thomas Reid and scepticism: his reliabilist response. London?; New York: Routledge.
De Cruz, H., and De Smedt, J. (2015). A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Dea, S. (2005). Thomas Reid's Rigourised Anti-Hypotheticalism. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 3(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2005.3.2.123
Ditto, P. H., and Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568
Edwards, K., and Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.5
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford.
Fosmoe, M. (2015, July 15). Bethel professor resigns after college stance on human origin. South Bend Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/education/bethel-professor-resigns-after-college-stance-on-human-origin/article_44687528-2ad1-11e5-9fc7-efffee979408.html
Garrett, A. (2004). In Defense of Elephants: Priestley on Reid on how to be a Newtonian of the Mind. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 2(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2004.2.2.137
Hartley, D. (1801). Observations on man, his frame, his duty, and his expectations (Fourth Ed., Vols. 1–3). London: J. Johnson. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/observationsonm00pistgoog
Heider, F., and Simmel, M. (1944). An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950
Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005
Hume, David. (2007 [1779]). Coleman, D., ed. Dialogues concerning natural religion and other writings. Cambridge, UK?; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hunsberger, B., Alisat, S., Pancer, S. M., and Pratt, M. (1996). Religious Fundamentalism and Religious Doubts: Content, Connections, and Complexity of Thinking. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0603_7
Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence (3rd ed., rev. and updated). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kelemen, D. (1999a). Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1440–1452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440
Kelemen, D. (1999b). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70(3), 241–272.
Krause, N., Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Ellison, C. G., and Wulff, K. M. (1999). Aging, Religious Doubt, and Psychological Well-Being. The Gerontologist, 39(5), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/39.5.525
McCauley, R. N. (2011). Why religion is natural and science is not. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mercier, H., and Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(02), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
Newton, I. (1979 [1704]). Opticks or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light. New York: Dover.
Newton, I. (2016 [1687]). The principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy. (I. B. Cohen, Ed.). Berkeley: UC Press.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., and Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356
Plantinga, A. (1984). Advice to Christian Philosophers. Faith and Philosophy, 1(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19841317
Plantinga, A. (1996). Respondeo. In J. L. Kvanvig (Ed.), Warrant in contemporary epistemology: essays in honor of Plantinga's theory of knowledge. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Popkin, Richard. (1965). Introduction. In Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Priestley, Joseph. (1775). An Examination of Dr. Reid's Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, Dr. Beattie's Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, and Dr. Oswald's Appeal to Common Sense on Behalf of Religion. London: J. Johnson. URL: https://archive.org/details/examinationofdrr00prieuoft
Russell, P. (2010). The riddle of Hume's treatise: skepticism, naturalism, and irreligion (First issued as paperback). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Reid, T. January-June 1778. Review of The Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity Illustrated; being an Appendix to the Disquisitions relating to Matter and Spirit by Joseph Priestley. The Monthly Review. 58: 347-353 and 354-362.
Reid, T. (1981). Thomas Reid's Lectures on natural theology (1780). (E. H. Duncan, Ed.). Washington, D.C: University Press of America.
Reid, T. (1996). Thomas Reid on the animate creation: papers relating to the life sciences. (P. Wood, Ed.). University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reid, T. (2000). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. (D. R. Brookes, Ed.) (Critical ed). University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
Reid, T. (2002a). Essays on the intellectual powers of man. (D. R. Brookes, Ed.) (1st cloth ed). University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reid, T. (2002b). The correspondence of Thomas Reid. (P. Wood, Ed.). University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reid, T. (2010). Essays on the active powers of man. (J. A. Harris, Ed.). University Park, Pa.?: Pennsylvania State University Press?; University of Edinburgh.
Schwitzgebel, E., and Cushman, F. (2014). Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-philosophers. In J. M. Knobe and S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy. Volume 2 (pp. 347–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taber, C. S., and Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
Teehan, J. (2010). In the name of God: the evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Thagard, P. (2005). The Emotional Coherence of Religion. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537054068642
Trivers, R. (2013). The folly of fools: the logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. New York: Basic Books.
Tuggy, D. (2000). Thomas Reid on Causation. Reid Studies, 3(2), 3–28.
Wolterstorff, N. (2004). Thomas Reid and the story of epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Wood, P. (1985). Thomas Reid's Critique of Joseph Priestley: Context and Chronology. Man and Nature, 4, 30–41.
