‘Haris’ in Saris
The Status of Women in the Hare Krishna Movement in Australia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/arsr.v21i2.217Keywords:
KhrisnaAbstract
Religions sometimes “confer” equality on women but set limits on female encroachment into the male domain. Legislation supporting equality between the sexes was enacted in the Hare Krishna movement in March 2000 following a study in 1996 that identified internal discrimination against female members. Research was conducted to assess the impact of the legislation in Australia and review the notion of gender equality in the movement. Forty-three female and fifty-eight male (N = 101) initiates were surveyed at Sydney and Melbourne temples and several interviews were held. It was found that increased moral support for women to perform status roles was not matched by greater inclusion. The presence of ambivalent sexism and conflicting cultural influences were indicated. Increases in training and education opportunities were suggested to move Hare Krishna women toward genuine equality with their male peers.References
Altermatt, W.T., C.N. DeWall and E. Leskinen 2003 Agency and Virtue: Dimensions Underlying Subgroups. Sex Roles 49(11/12): 631-41. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000003133.90488.71.
Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] 2001 Australian Social Trends 2001: Population—Population Growth: Coming to Australia. ABS publication ‘Migration’ (Cat. no. 3412.0).
Bouma, G.D. 1997 The Settlement of Islam in Australia. Social Compass 44(1): 71-82. doi:10.1177/003776897044001006.
Brooks, C.R. 1989 The Hare Krishnas in India. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Camussi, E., and C. Leccardi 2005 Stereotypes of Working Women: The Power of Expectations. Social Science Information 44(1): 113-40. doi:10.1177/0539018405050463.
Conway, M., T. Pizzamiglio and L. Mount 1996 Status, Communality, and Agency: Implications for Stereotypes of Gender and Other Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 25-38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.25 PMid:8709000.
Deaux, K. 1995 How Basic Can You Be? The Evolution of Research on Gender Stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues 51: 11-20.
Dhruvarajan, V. 1993 Ethnic Cultural Retention and Transmission among First Generation Hindu Asian Indians in a Canadian Prairie City. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 24(1): 63-79.
Eagly, A.H. 1978 Sex Differences in Influenceability. Psychological Bulletin 85: 86-116.
Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis. American Psychologist 38: 971-81.
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Prejudice: Towards a More Inclusive Understanding. In Social Psychology of Group Identity and Social Conflict: Theory, Application and Practice, edited by A.H. Eagly, 45-64. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Eagly, A.H., and C. Chrvala 1986 Sex Differences in Conformity: Status and Gender Role Interpretations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 10: 203-20. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1986.tb00747.x.
Eagly, A.H., and W. Wood 1985 Gender and Influenceability: Stereotype versus Behavior. In Women, Gender, and Social Psychology, edited by V.E. O’Leary, R.K. Unger, and B.S. Wallston, 225-56. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Eagly, A.H., W. Wood and L. Fishbaugh 1981 Sex Differences in Conformity: Surveillance by the Group as a Determinant of Male Nonconformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 384-94. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.384.
Fiske, S.T. 1998 Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and L. Gardner, 357-411. McGraw–Hill, New York.
Frosh, S. 1997 Fundamentalism, Gender and Family Therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 19(4): 417-30. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00059.
Glick, P., and S.T. Fiske 1996 The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 491-512.
An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality. American Psychologist 56: 109-18. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109 PMid:11279804.
ISKCON 2005 Prabhupada Disciple Database. Online: http://www.prabhupada.com/disciple (accessed 26 January 2005).
Jost, J., and M. Banaji 1994 The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology 33: 1-27.
Judah, S. 1974 Hare Krishna and the Counterculture. Wiley, New York.
Jyotirmayi, D.D. 2002 Women in ISKCON in Prabhupada’s Times. Chakra Newsletter. Online: http://www.chakra.org/discussions/WomenNov29_02_02.html (accessed 1 March 2005)
Knott, K. 2004 Healing the Heart of ISKCON: The Place of Women. In The Hare Krishna Movement, edited by E. Bryant and M. Ekstrand, 291-311. Columbia University Press, New York.
Kurien, P. 1999 Gendered Ethnicity: Creating a Hindu Indian Identity in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist 42(4): 648-70. doi:10.1177/00027649921954408.
Kurma, D. 1999 The Great Transcendental Adventure: Pastimes of His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada in Australia and New Zealand. Chakra Press, Sydney.
Markus, H.R., S. Kitayama and R. Heiman 1996 Culture and Basic Psychological Principles. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski, 857-913. Guilford, New York.
Neff, K.D. 2001 Judgments of Personal Autonomy and Interpersonal Responsibility in the Context of Indian Spousal Relationships: An Examination of Young People’s Reasoning in Mysore, India. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 19(2): 233-57. doi:10.1348/026151001166056.
Poling, T.H., and J.F. Kenney 1986 The Hare Krishna Character Type: A Study of the Sensate Personality. The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston.
Poole, R. 1991 Morality and Modernity. Routledge, London.
Radha, D.D. 2001 Participation, Protection and Patriarchy: An International Model for the Role of Women in ISKCON. Cultic Studies Review 1(1): 1.
Ralston, H. 1991 Religious Movements and the Status of Women in India. Social Compass 38(1): 43-53. doi:10.1177/003776891038001006.
Reddy, I., and F.J. Hanna 1995 The Life-Style of the Hindu Woman: Conceptualising Female Clients of Indian Origin. Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice 51(3): 216-30.
Rochford, E.B. Jr. 1985 Hare Krishna in America. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. doi:10.2307/3711761.
Family Structure, Commitment, and Involvement in the Hare Krishna Movement. Sociology of Religion 56(2): 153-75.
Prabhupada Centennial Survey: A Summary of the Final Report. ISKCON Communications Journal 7(1): 11-26.
Demons, Karmis and Non-Devotees: Culture, Group Boundaries, and Development of Hare Krishna in North America and Europe. Social Compass 47(2): 168-86. doi:10.1177/003776800047002003.
Family Formation, Culture and Change in the Hare Krishna Movement. Cultic Studies Review 1(1): 1.
Hare Krishna Transformed. New York University Press, New York.
Rosen, S.J. 1992 Vaisnavism: Contemporary Scholars Discuss the Gaudiya Tradition, Folk Books, New York.
Rossi, A.S. 1970 Sentiment and Intellect: The Story of John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill. In Essays on Sex Equality, edited by A.S. Rossi, 3-63. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rudman, L.A. 1998 Self-Promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counterstereotypical Impression Management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 629-45. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 PMid:9523410.
Rudman, L.A., and P. Glick 1999 Feminized Management and Backlash toward Agentic Women: The Hidden Costs to Women of a Kinder, Gentler Image of Middle Managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 1004-10. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004 PMid:10573877.
Saliba, J.A. 2003 Understanding New Religious Movements. 2nd ed. Altamira Press, New York.
Sanday, P.R. 1996 Female Power and Male Dominance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Saxena, G. 1986 Cross Cultural Perceptions of Masculinity and Femininity. Indian Journal of Behaviour 10(1): 10-4.
Sudharma, D.D., and D.D. Vishaka 2000 Women in ISKCON: Presentations to the GBC, March 2000. ISKCON Communications Journal [ICJ] 8(1): 1.
Thomas-Hunt, M.C., and K.W. Phillips 2004 When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30(12): 1585-98. doi:10.1177/0146167204271186 PMid:15536241.
Viki, G.T., D. Abrams and P. Hutchison 2003 The ‘True’ Romantic: Benevolent Sexism and Paternalistic Chivalry. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 49(9/10): 533-37.
Wadley, S.S. 1977 Women and the Hindu Tradition. Signs 3(1): 113-25. doi:10.1086/493444.
Weber, M. 1993 The Sociology of Religion. Beacon Press, Boston.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
