Mountains Analogous? The Academic Urban Legend of Alejandro Jodorowsky’s Cult Film Adaptation of René Daumal’s Esoteric Novel

Authors

  • David Pecotic Independent Scholar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jasr.v27i3.25736

Keywords:

Alejandro Jodorowsky, René Daumal, G.I. Gurdjieff, film adaptation, occulture, academic urban legends, cultural production theory, Surrealism, Le Grand Jeu

Abstract

The Chilean-French avant-garde filmmaker and self-styled spiritual teacher Alejandro Jodorowsky’s film, The Holy Mountain (1973), is often referred to as a ‘surrealistic’ exploration of Western Esotericism, and was a pivotal cinematic moment for what Christopher Partridge (2004, 2005) has termed ‘occulture’. It is often claimed in secondary literature and informally online that the film is based on the unfinished novel Mount Analogue (1952) by René Daumal, French writer and follower of the esotericist G.I. Gurdjieff. The Holy Mountain is thus a clear candidate for testing theories about the cultural production of ‘Gurdjieffian’ film adaptations. A closer reading, however, shows that the two texts share few ideological or even structural elements. In the wake of the film’s reception and Jodorowsky’s growing cultural importance, this article maps the congruence of the film to the novel by focusing on the role played by the eponymous mountain as the only invariant symbol in both. Some of the biographical contours of the two artists’ relationship to Gurdjieffian and wider occultural esoteric discourses will also be traced to reveal the pre-critical and largely self referential narrative of the film adaptation in the secondary literature as a species of academic urban legend-making.

Author Biography

  • David Pecotic, Independent Scholar
    David Pecotic (http://independent.academia.edu/DavidPecotic) holds a PhD in Studies in Religion from the University of Sydney. His dissertation concerned the role embodiment played in the mysticism of G.I. Gurdjieff with reference to Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson (1950), and the methodological and successional reasons why scholars ignored both in favour of Gurdjieff’s most famous and more easily understood student P.D. Ouspensky’s In Search of the Miraculous (1949). His publications include entries on both Gurdjieff and Ouspensky for Bron R. Taylor and Jeffrey Kaplan (eds.), The Encyclopaedia of Religion and Nature (Continuum, 2008), the chapter ‘From Ouspensky’s Hobby to Groundhog Day: The Production and Adaptation of Strange Life of Ivan Osokin’, in Carole M. Cusack and Alex Norman (eds.), Handbook of New Religions and Cultural Production (Brill, 2012) and Building Higher Bodies: G.l. Gurdjieff and the Place of Materialism in the Academic Study of Esotericism (Routledge, forthcoming).

Published

2015-03-03

How to Cite

Pecotic, D. (2015). Mountains Analogous? The Academic Urban Legend of Alejandro Jodorowsky’s Cult Film Adaptation of René Daumal’s Esoteric Novel. Journal for the Academic Study of Religion, 27(3), 367-387. https://doi.org/10.1558/jasr.v27i3.25736