Faith and Politics
The Rhetoric of Church–State Separation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jasr.v18i1.25Keywords:
church and state, politics and religion, secularizationAbstract
Criticism of religiously motivated contributions to public policy debate is largely misconceived. It assumes that the mischief which constitutional separation of church and state is supposed to cure is a domination of the state by the church. This presents only one side of the story. Subservience by the church to the state should also be avoided. The law of a liberal state is legitimate to the extent that it does not conflict with the basic moral values of its citizens. Therefore, an ongoing conversation about basic values is necessary. Allowing churches and individual believers the freedom to make distinctive ‘religious’ contributions to this conversation is consistent with the separation of church and state. It is an aspect of the liberal democratic state’s obligation to listen to all perspectives on difficult moral issues. A close relationship between church and state, on the other hand, has the capacity to impede the conversation.
References
Aagaard, J. 2002 State Churches, Advantages and Drawbacks. Available online at <http://www.theonet.dk/spirituality/spirit02-15/Statechurches_Advantages_and_Drawbacks_JAA>.
Abbott, T. 2002 Speech to House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates, 21 August 2002: 5303-5306.
Anderson, J. 2002a Speech to House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates, 20 August 2002: 5245-49.
b ‘Embryos must be protected’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 August 2002.
Audi 1993 ‘The Place of Religious Argument in a Free and Democratic Society’, 30 San Francisco Law Review 677: 688-90.
Bruhn, V. 1994 A People and its Church: The Lutheran Church in Denmark. The Church of Denmark Council on Inter-Church Relations, Copenhagen.
Casanova, J. 1994 Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, J. 2002 Speech to Senate. Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 12 November 2002: 6058-64.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 2002 Doctrinal Note on some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life. Available online at <http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregation_cfaith.doc_20021124_politica_en.html>.
Douez, S., and D. Gray 2002 Latham Attacks Church Lecturing. The Age (Melbourne), 22 August 2002.
Dunn, J. 1996 The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dworkin, R. 1985 A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Freedom’s Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Engmark, J. 2001 The Church in Denmark. The Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs, Copenhagen
Fisher, A. 2002 Ethical and Practical Questions about the Embryonic Stem Cell Panacea. Paper given at the Conference of the Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, 26 July 2002. Available online at <http://www.health.thechurch.com.au/scr_036.html>.
Gregg, S. 2004 Rendering Under Caesar. Occasional Paper, 90; The Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.
Harradine, B. 2002 All lives are of Equal Value, Even Embryos. The Australian (Sydney), 11 November 2002.
Hartling, P., ed. 1964 The Danish Church. Det Danske Selskab, Copenhagen.
Hitchcock, J. 2004 The Enemies of Religious Liberty. First Things, February 2004: 26-29.
Jespersen, K.J.V. 2004 A History of Denmark. Palgrave Macmillian, Basingstoke.
Jones, W.G. 1986 Denmark: A Modern History. Croom Helm, London.
Latham, M. 2002 Speech to House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 21 August 2002: 5342-47.
Locke, J. 1685 A Letter Concerning Toleration.
Madeley, J.T.S. 2003 A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Church–state Relations in Europe. In Church and State in Contemporary Europe, edited by J.T.S. Madeley and Z. Enyedi, 23-50.
Madeley, J.T.S., and Z. Enyedi, eds. 2003 Church and State in Contemporary Europe: The Chimera of Neutrality. Frank Cass, London.
Marr, D. 1999 The High Price of Heaven. Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, New South Wales.
Minchin, N. 2002 Speech to Senate. Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 11 November 2002: 5949-53.
Minkenberg, M. 2003 The Policy Impact of Church–state Relations: Family Policy and Abortion in Britain, France and Germany. In Church and State in Contemporary Europe, edited by J.T.S. Madeley and Z. Enyedi, 195-217.
Moses, J.A. 2000 Incarnation and the State: The Modern German Example. In That Our Joy May Be Complete: Essays on the Incarnation for the New Millennium, edited by M. Free, R. Gill, J. Holland and J. Mainstone, 80-96. Open Book Publishers, Adelaide.
Neuhaus, R.J. 1986 The Naked Public Square. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.
O’Donovan, Oliver 1996 The Desire of Nations: Rediscovering the Roots of Political Theology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
O’Dwyer, J. 2000 The Federal Government and the Catholic Church conspire to oppose IVF for single and lesbian women. On Line Opinion, 15 November 2000. Available online at <http://www.onlineopinion.co.au/2000/Nov00/O’Dwyer.htm>.
Rawls, John 1993 Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York.
Savva, N. 1997 ‘The God Squad’, The Age (Melbourne), 1 April 1997.
Thulstrup, N. 1984 Kierkegaard and the Church in Denmark. CA Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen.
Tolderlund-Hansen, G. 1964 History of the Danish Church. In The Danish Church, edited by P. Hartling, n. p.
Vanstone, A. 2002 Speech to Senate. Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 11 November 2002: 5857-61.
Waldron, J. 1999 Law and Disagreement. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Westergaard Madsen, W. 1964 The Danish National Church. In The Danish Church, edited by P. Hartling,n. p.
Whale, J.S. 1962 The Protestant Tradition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Williamson, René de Visme 1976 Politics and Protestant Theology. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
Witte, J. 2002 Law and Protestantism: The Legal Teachings of the Lutheran Reformation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
