Toward a (More) Inclusive FORB
A Framework for the Advocacy for the Rights of Indigenous People
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.24947Keywords:
kepercayaan, indigenous, official religion, religious freedom, Constitutional Court, inclusiveAbstract
Freedom of religion or belief (FORB) is supposedly universal, but religion has been predominantly defined as prototyping and privileging the so-called “world religions.” As a consequence, the religions of indigenous people have been treated as culture and as such excluded from FORB discourse. Drawing on the Indonesian context, this paper shows a new potential framework for a more inclusive FORB. It examines two decisions by the Indonesian Constitutional Court that dismantled the politics of “official” religions and expanded the notion of FORB, hence it fosters a more inclusive FORB. This article examines the commonly conceptualized anthropocentric human rights/FORB and compares it with the ecocentric paradigm of indigenous religions. It concludes that kepercayaan, as the constitutional term for indigenous religions, should be advocated to accommodate the ecocentric paradigm. In this way, the Indonesian understanding and practice of FORB may contribute to the global discourse of FORB and indigenous religions.
References
Bagir, Z.A. (2014). “Advocacy for Religious Freedom in Democratizing Indonesia.” The Review of Faith & International Affairs 12(4): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2014.976084
———.(2018). “The Politics and Law of Religious Governance.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia. Edited by R.W. Hefner, 284–295. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628837-23
Bagir, Z.A., and R. Arianingtyas. (2020). “Limitations to Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia: Norms and Practices.” Religion & Human Rights15(1–2): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-BJA10003
Barsh, R. L. (1986). “The Illusion of Religious Freedom for Indigenous Americans.” Oregon Law Review 65: 363–412.
Bird-David, N. (1999). “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology.” Current Anthropology 40(Supplement February): S67–S91. https://doi.org/10.1086/200061
Butt, Simon. 2020. “Constitutional Recognition of “Beliefs” in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Religion 35(3): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2020.39
Cotter, C.R., and D.G. Robertson. (2016). After World Religions: Reconstructing Religious Studies. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688046
Maarif, S. (2017). Pasang Surut Rekognisi Agama Leluhur dalam Politik Agama di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: CRCS UGM.
———.(2019). “Indigenous Religion Paradigm: Re-interpreting Religious Practices of Indigenous People.” 44: 56–103.
———.(2021). “Re-establishing Human-Nature Relations: Responses of Indigenous People of Indonesia to Covid-19.” Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 7(2): 447–472. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10023
McNally, M.D. (2019). “Native American Religious Freedom as a Collective Right.” Brigham Young University Law Review (1): 205–292.
———.(2020). Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shrubsole, N. (2019). What Has No Place, Remains: The Challenges for Indigenous Religious Freedom in Canada Today. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487530730
Sullivan, W.F. et al. (eds.). (2015). Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.001.0001
wa Mutua, Makau. (1999). “Limitations on Religious Rights: Problematizing Religious Freedom in the African Context.” Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 5: 75–105.
Wenger, T. (2009). We have a religion: The 1920s Pueblo Indian Dance Controversy and American Religious Freedom. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/9780807894217_wenger
