Freedom of Religion amid Polarization and Religious Moderation Policy

Authors

  • Suhadi Cholil State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta/Area Research Center of the National Research and Innovation Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.24603

Keywords:

moderation, freedom, harmony, Indonesia

Abstract

To address religious extremism and radicalism, the Indonesian government initiated the idea of “religious moderation” as an official state policy centered at the Ministry of Religious Affairs. Since 2019 the government has published books, guidance, and held various trainings on religious moderation, especially in institutions related to the Ministry. It also develops religious moderation instruments to ensure that government employees and officials, especially those within the Ministry, are free from exposure to extremism and radicalism. The idea is presented by the government as appreciating, respecting, and protecting the valued religious pluralism in Indonesia. But this article also argues that, upon critical examination, there are tensions between this idea and freedom of religion or belief in Indonesia. The religious moderation policy may run counter to freedom of religion or expression and overlooks central weaknesses in the existing state governance of religion 

References

Aitamurto, Kaarina. (2021). “Patriotic Loyalty and Interest Representation among the Russian Islamic Elite,” Religion, 51:2, 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2021.1865604

Bagir, Zainal Abidin, and Jimmy M.I. Sormin. (2022) “Epilog: Cukupkah Menjadi Moderat?” In Politik Moderasi Beragama: Suatu Tinjauan Kritis. Edited by Zainal Abidin Bagir and Jimmy M.I. Sormin, 167–180. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Es, Margaretha A. van (2021). “Norwegian Muslims Denouncing Terrorism: Beyond ‘Moderate’ versus ‘Radical’?” Religion 51(2): 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2021.1865600

Fealy, Greg. (2020). “Jokowi in the Covid-19 Era: Repressive Pluralism, Dynasticism and the Overbearing State.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 56(3): 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1846482

Hefner, Robert. (2011). “Where have all the abangan gone? Religionization and the Decline of Non-Standard Islam in Contemporary Indonesia.” In The Politics of Religion in Indonesia: Syncretism, Orthodoxy, and Religious Contention in Java and Bali. Edited by Michel Picard and Rémy Madinier. London: Routledge.

Kelompok Kerja Implementasi Moderasi Beragama Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019) Implementasi Moderasi Beragama dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI.

Kementerian Agama RI, (2019). Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.

Pektas, Serafettin. (2021). “A Comparative Analysis of Three Sunni Muslim Organizations on ‘Moderate’ and ‘Radical’ Islam in Egypt, Morocco and Indonesia.” Religion 51(2): 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1868383

Meinema, Erik. (2021). “Countering ‘Islamic’ Violent Extremism? The Implementation of Programs to Prevent Radicalization by Muslim-led Civil Society Organizations in Malindi, Kenya.” Religion 51(2): 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2021.1865603

Ricklefs, M. (2012). Islamisation and its Opponents in Java: A Political, Social, Cultural and Religious History, c. 1930 to Present. Singapore: NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qv3fh

Sutanto, Trisno S. et al. (2022). “Menakar Moderasi Beragama: Pembacaan Kritis.” In Politik Moderasi Beragama: Suatu Tinjauan Kritis. Edited by Zainal Abidin Bagir and Jimmy M.I. Sormin, 1–91. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Qoumas, Yaqut Cholil. (2020). “Serius dalam Penguatan Moderasi Beragama.” https://kemenag.go.id/read/serius-dalam-penguatan-moderasi-beragama-nvdpy-nvdpy-nvdpy.

Tim Kelompok Kerja Moderasi Beragama Kementerian Agama RI, (2020). Peta Jalan (Roadmap) Penguatan Moderasi Beragama Tahun 2020-2024. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI.

Published

2023-03-30

Issue

Section

Round Table

How to Cite

Cholil, S. (2023). Freedom of Religion amid Polarization and Religious Moderation Policy. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology, 6(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.24603