Anthropological Case Studies As Research Design For Intercultural Theology

Authors

  • Daniel Jara J Ruhr-Universität Bochum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.20060

Keywords:

Qualitative case studies, Research design, intercultural theology, action research, participatory research, external validity – transferability

Abstract

This article explores the suitability of anthropological Case Studies (CSs) as a research design for research related to intercultural theology. The introduction refers briefly to the crisis of modernity’s missiological paradigm and the emergence of contextual theologies and intercultural theology as responses. It subsequently focuses on the ambivalent historical relationship between anthropological research and theological endeavors and the current relevance of culture studies for theological research. The following section targets the characteristics and aims of CSs and their nature as a research design rather than a method, along with the nature of the cases, their types, and their selection criteria. It also evaluates the possibilities of CSs as a research design for intercultural theology with special attention to two “research styles”: action research and participatory action research. The main criticisms of the CS design (reliability, internal validity, and transferability) as well as the comparison issue among cases are explained. Finally, this describes how the conjunction of theological research and models from cultural studies transcends a purely practical approach, implying the epistemological and even ontological postulates that sustain both disciplines.

References

Anderson, Allan. 1993. Tumelo: The Faith of African Pentecostals in South Africa. Pretoria: University of South Africa Press.

Arzaluz, Socorro. 2005.“La utilización del estudio de caso en el análisis local.” Religión y Sociedad 17(32): 107–144. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2005.32.a601

Bell, John et al. 2004. “Comparative Similarities and Differences between Action Research, Participative Research, and Participatory Action Research.” https://arlecchino.org/ildottore/mwsd/group2final-comparison.html

Bennett, Z. et al. 2018. Invitation to Research in Practical Theology. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351068246

Bergold, Jarg, and Stefan Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 13(1): 191–222.

Bortey, Eric, and Ebenezer Quaye. 2016. Intercultural Reading of John 10:1-21. Intercultural Biblical Hermeneutics Series 4. Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies.

Boulton, J., and Preiser, R. 2021. Action Research.” In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Edited by R. Bigg et al. 217–229. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339-18

Castro, Edgar. 2010. “El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación y su importancia en la dirección y administración de empresas.” Revista Nacional de Administración 1(2): 31–54. https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v1i2.332

Coghlan, D. 2019. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. Teller Road: Sage Publications Ltd.

Coller, Xavier. 2000. Estudio de Casos. Cuadernos metodológicos 30. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas CIS

Dawson, P. 1997 “In at the Deep End: Conducting Processual Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 13: 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00025-0

De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2002. The End of the Cognitive Empire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

———. 2010. Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Montevideo: Gráfica Don Bosco.

Frederiks, Martha, and Dorottya Nagy (eds.). 2021. World Christianity: Methodological Considerations. Leiden and Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004444867

Faubion, James D. (ed). 1995. Rethinking the Subject. An Anthology of Contemporary European Social Thought. San Francisco: Westview Press

Feagin, Joe, Anthony Orum, and G. Sjoberg, (eds.) 1991. A Case for Case Studies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2013. “Cinco malentendidos acerca de la investigación mediante los estudios de caso.” Reis 106(4): 33–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184584

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Broadway: Stanford University Press

Goldschmidt, Walter. 1977. “Anthropology and the Coming Crises: An Auto-ethnographic Appraisal.” American Anthropologist.79(2): 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1977.79.2.02a00060

González, Justo. 2002. The Changing Shape of Church History. Saint Louis: The Chalice Press.

Goode, William, and Paul Hatt. 1976. Métodos de investigación social. México City: Trillas.

Gruber, Judith. 2017. “Intercultural Theology as a (Post)colonial Project? Reflections from Central Europe.” Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology 1(1): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.32713

———. 2018a. Intercultural Theology: Exploring World Christianity after the Cultural Turn. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

———. 2018b. “Methods in Intercultural Theology after the Cultural Turn.” In Shifting Locations and Reshaping Methods. Edited by Ulrich Winkler and Henry Jansen. Interreligious Studies Series 12. 7–22. Zurich: Lit Verlag GmbH & Co.

Hopkins, A.I. 1927. In the Isles of King Solomon: Twenty-Five Years among the Primitive Solomon Islanders. London: Kegan Paul.

Idowu, Bolaji. 1973. African Traditional Religion: A Definition. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

———. 1994. Olódùmarè: God in Yoruba Belief. New York: Wazobia.

Irvin, Dale T. 2008. “World Christianity: An Introduction.” The Journal of World Christianity 1(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5325/jworlchri.1.1.0001

Ivens, Walter G. 1930. The Island Builders of the Pacific. London: Seely.

Jara, Daniel. 2021. “Christian Knowings from the global South” Interkulturelle Theologie – Zeitschrift fur Missionswissenschaft 47(1). 150–169.

Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemonía y estrategia socialista. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI

Marradi, Alberto. 1977. “Esperimento, Associazione e Insieme non Standard.” In Politica e Società: studi in onore di Luciano Cavalli. Edited by Gianfranco Bettin. 675–689.Padua: Cedam.

Marradi, A., N. Archenti, and J. Piovani. 2007. Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.

Martinez, Piedad. 2006. “El estudio de caso: estrategia metodológica de la investigación científica.” Pensamiento & Gestion 20: 165–193.

Mbiti, John. 1969. African Religions and Philosophy. London: Heinemann.

———. 1970. Concepts of God in Africa. London: SPCK.

Munikwa, Christopher, and Jurgens Hendriks. 2011. “The Binga Outreach: Towards Intercultural Mission in the Reformed Church in Zimbabwe.” Dutch Reformed Theological Journal / Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif, 52(3–4): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.5952/52-3-55

Neiman, Guillermo, and Quaranta, Germán. “Los estudios de caso en la investigación sociológica.” In Estrategias de Investigación Cualitativa. Edited by Irene Vasilachis. 213–237.Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.

Nida, Eugene. 1954. Customs and Cultures: Anthropology for Christian Missions. New York: Harper & Row.

Ortega, Imanos. 2012. “La naturaleza comparativa de los estudios de caso.” Encrucijadas 4: 81–94.

Panotto, Nicolás. 2015. Teologías y ciencias sociales: convergencias epistemológicas y hermenéuticas. In Misión holística, acción interdisciplinaria y realidad latino-americana. Edited by Fernando Bullón. Grand Rapids, MI: Libros Desafío/AIPESC.

———. 2016. “Rostros de lo divino y construccion del ethos socio-politico - relacion entre teologia y antropologia en el estudio del campo religioso, el caso del pentecostalismo en Argentina.” Debates do NER 28: 69–97. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8136.61268

Participate, Knowledge from the Margins for the SDGs. 2020. “Participatory Research Methods.” https://participatesdgs.org/methods/

Penny, Alfred. 1928. Ten Years in Melanesia. London: Seely.

Piovani, Ignacio, and Nora Krawczyk. 2017. “Los estudios comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas.” Educação & Realidade. 42(3): 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623667609

Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Oakland: University of California Press.

“Religious Studies and Mission Studies” Group. 2005. “Missionswissenschaft als Interkulturelle Theologie und ihr Verhältnis zur Religionswissenschaft.” Zeitschrift für Mission 31(4): 376–382.

Robinson, M.Kuehn, E. Sadje, H. 2020. “Documenting and Describing the Trans-cultural: Qualitative Research in Theological Communication.” In: What Does Theology Do, Actually? Edited by Matthew Robinson. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. 162–173.

Schmidlin, Joseph. 1920. “Missionswissenschaft und Missionspraxis.” Zeitschrift f ür Missionswissenschaft 10: 1–11.

Schreiter, Robert. 2017. “Trajectories in Intercultural Theology.” Intereligious Studies and Intercultural Theology 1(1): 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.33160

Stake, R.E. 1994. “Case Studies” In Handbook of QualitativeResearch. Edited by N. Denzwhytein and Y. Lincoln. 236–245.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

———. 1995. Investigación con Estudios de Caso. Madrid: Ediciones Morata S. L.Toren, Benno van den. 2015. “Intercultural Theology as a Three-Way Conversation: Beyond the Western Dominance of Intercultural Theology.” Exchange 44 (123): 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1163/1572543X-12341354

Toren, Benno van den, and Klaas Bom. 2018. “On the Value of Action and Participatory Research for Intercultural Theology: Reflections in the Light of a Research Project on “Science and Religion in French-Speaking Africa.” Mission Studies 35: 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/15733831-12341548

Urry, James. 1984. “A History of the Field Methods” In: Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct. Edited by Roy Ellen. London: Academic Press.

Van der Walt, Charlene. 2014. Toward a Communal Reading of 2 Samuel 13. Intercultural Biblical Hermeneutics Series 2. Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies.

Walter, M. Boni, A. 2020. Participatory Research, Capabilities and Epistemic Justice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56197-0

Whiteman, Darrell. 2012. “Anthropology and Mission: The Incarnation Connection.” Mission and Culture 48: 59–98.

Winkler, Ulrich, and Henry Jansen (eds.). 2018. Shifting Locations and Reshaping Methods. Interreligious Studies Series 12. Zurich: Lit Verlag GmbH & Co.

Wit, Hans de et al. (eds.). 2004. Through the Eyes of Another. Winona Lake: Evangel Press.

Wrogemann, Henning. 2013. “Dimensionen und Aufgaben des Faches Interkulturelle Theologie/Missionswissenschaft im Kanon theologischer Wissenschaft.” Evangelische Theologie 73: 437–449. https://doi.org/10.14315/evth-2013-73-6-437

Yin, Robert. 1994. “The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 59–65.

Young, Pauline V. 1939. Scientific Social Surveys and Research: An Introduction to the Background, Content, Methods, and Analysis of Social Studies. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.

Published

2023-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jara J, D. (2023). Anthropological Case Studies As Research Design For Intercultural Theology. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology, 6(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.20060