Multiple Religious Belonging and Religious Communities

Exploring a Neglected Dimension

Authors

  • Jonatan Hendriks Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • André van der Braak Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.19596

Keywords:

multiple religious belonging, dual belonging, religious plurality, multireligiosity, religious communities, rhizomatic belonging

Abstract

This contribution investigates the concept “community” as a previously underexplored dimension of multiple religious belonging (MRB). A review of the MRB approach to multireligiosity reveals there has been paid relatively little attention to community influence and fluid, non-dualistic styles of religious belonging. We argue that these styles of multiple belonging cannot be accounted for by conventional understandings of MRB that assume a “World Religions Paradigm.” After reviewing two approaches to this problem, the article explores a rhizomatic approach to MRB and religious communities. To illustrate this approach, a brief review of several Dutch multireligious communities is presented.

Author Biography

André van der Braak, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

André van der Braak is Professor of Buddhist Philosophy in Dialogue with other World Views at the Faculty of Theology of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. He co-directs the international research project “Multiple Religious Belonging”. His publications include Enlightenment Blues (2003), Nietzsche and Zen: Self-overcoming without a Self(2011), and Religion and Social Cohesion: Western, Chinese and Intercultural Perspectives (2015).

References

Allport, Gordon W., and J. Michael Ross. 1967. “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212

Batson, C. Daniel. 1976. “Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent?” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 15: 29–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1384312

Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Berghuijs, Joantine. 2017. “Multiple Religious Belonging in the Netherlands: An Empirical Approach to Hybrid Religiosity.” Open Theology 3 (1): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0003

Berghuijs, Joantine, Hans Schilderman, André van der Braak, and Manuela Kalsky. 2018. “Exploring Single and Multiple Religious Belonging.” Journal of Empirical Theology 31(1): 18–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341365

Bidwell, Duane R. 2018. When One Religion Isn’t Enough: The Lives of Spiritually Fluid People. Boston: Beacon Press.

Bolsenbroek, Anouk. 2008. “Humanistische Stromingen: Ontwikkelingslijnen en Perspectieven.” PhD diss., Universiteit voor Humanistiek, Utrecht.

Boogaard, Raymond van den. 2018. De Religieuze Rebellen van de Vrije Gemeente. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bas Lubberhuizen.

Brahma Kumaris Spirituele Academie. n.d. “Home.” https://www.bksa.org

Braak, André van der. 2017. “Zen-Christian Dual Belonging and the Practice of Apophasis: Strategies of Meeting Rose Drew’s Theological Challenge.” Open Theology 3(1): 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0034

Braak, André van der, and Manuela Kalsky, eds. 2017. Topical Issue of Multiple Religious Belonging. Open Theology 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0051

Broadfoot, Kirsten J., Debashish Munshi, and Natalie Nelson-Marsh. 2010. “COMMUNEcation: A Rhizomatic Tale of Participatory Technology, Postcoloniality and Professional Community.” New Media & Society 12 (5): 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809348880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809348880

Bruce, Steve. 2017. “Multiple Religious Belonging: Conceptual Advance or Secularization Denial?” Open Theology 3 (1): 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0047

Cormier, Dave. 2008. “Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum.” Innovate: Journal of Online Education 4(5).

Cornille, Catherine, ed. 2002. Many Mansions? Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

Cotter, Christopher, and David G. Robertson, eds. 2016. After World Religions: Reconstructing World Religions. London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688046

Dalton, James H., Maurice J. Elias, and Abraham Wandersman. 2001. Community Psychology: Linking Individuals and Communities. Stamford: Wadsworth.

D’Costa, Gavin, and Ross Thompson. 2016. Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmations, Objections, Explorations. Farnham/Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562735

D’Costa, Gavin. 2016. “A Roman Catholic Approach to Buddhist-Christian ‘Double Belonging’.” In Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmations, Objections, Explorations, edited by Gavin D’Costa and Ross Thompson, 107–122. Farnham/Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562735-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562735-7

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1980. Mille Plateaux: Capitalisme et Schizophrénie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

De Poort. n.d. “Home.” https://www.cursuscentrumdepoort.nl

Dobbelaere, Karel. 1999. “Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization.” Sociology of Religion 60(3): 229–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3711935

Drew, Rose. 2011. Buddhist and Christian? An Exploration of Dual Belonging. New York: Routledge.

Dunham, Laura, R. Edward Freeman, and Jeanne Liedtka. 2012. “Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community.” Business Ethics Quarterly 16(1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20061611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20061611

Fernback, Jan. 2007. “Beyond the Diluted Community Concept: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective on Online Social Relations.” New Media & Society 9(1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444807072417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072417

Glock, Charles Y., and Rodney Stark. 1965. Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Goossaert, Vincent, and David A. Palmer. 2011. The Religious Question in Modern China. London/Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304182.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304182.001.0001

Groot, Kees de, Jos Pieper, and Willem Putman, eds. 2013. Zelf Zorgen voor Je Ziel: De Actualiteit van Christelijke Spirituele Centra. Almere: Parthenon.

Halman, Loek, and Veerle Draulans. 2004. “Religious Beliefs and Practices in Contemporary Europe.” In European Values at the Turn of the Millennium, edited by Wil Arts and Loek Halman, 283–316. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047405900_015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047405900_015

Harris, Mark W. 2018. Historical Dictionary of Unitarian Universalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hart, Joep de, and Paul Dekker. 2015. “Floating Believers: Dutch Seekers and the Church.” In A Catholic Minority Church in a World of Seekers, edited by Staf Hellemans and Peter Jonkers, 71–96. Washington: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

Hedges, Paul. 2017. “Multiple Religious Belonging after Religion: Theorising Strategic Religious Participation in a Shared Religious Landscape as a Chinese Model.” Open Theology 3 (1): 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0005

Hendriks, Jonatan. 2020. “Exploring Multiple Community Belonging: An Interdisciplinary Comparison of Community Markers.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies 15 (2): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v15i02/81-99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v15i02/81-99

Hillery, George A. 1955. “Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement.” Rural Sociology 20: 111–123.

Hirschi, Travis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Introvigne, Massimo. 2003. “Lectorium Rosicrucianum: A Dutch Movement Becomes International.” In New Religions in a Postmodern World, edited by Reender Kranenborg and Mikael Rothstein, 11–22. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

Jironet, Karin. 2002. The Image of Spiritual Liberty in the Western Sufi Movement Following Hazrat Inayat Khan. Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters.

Kalsky, Manuela. 2017. “Flexible Believers in the Netherlands: A Paradigm Shift toward Transreligious Multiplicity.” Open Theology 3 (1): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0027

Krijger, Tom-Eric. 2019. The Eclipse of Liberal Protestantism in the Netherlands. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410084

Lähdesmäki, Tuuli, Tuija Saresma, Kaisa Hiltunen, Saara Jäntti, Nina Sääskilahti, Antti Vallius, and Kaisa Ahvenjärvi. 2016. “Fluidity and Flexibility of ‘Belonging’: Uses of the Concept in Contemporary Research.” Acta Sociologica 29: 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699316633099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699316633099

Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lectorium Rosicrucianum. n.d. “Wat is het Rozenkruis?” https://www.rozenkruis.nl

Lee, David, and Howard Newby. 1983. The Problem of Sociology: An Introduction to the Discipline. London: Hutchinson.

Le Grand, Hans. 2019. “Gordon Kaufman and a Theology for the Seeker.” Religions 10(8): 480–500. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080480

Liefbroer, Anke I., André van der Braak, and Manuela Kalsky. 2018. “Multiple Religious Belonging among Visitors of Dominican Spiritual Centers in the Netherlands.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 33(3): 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2018.1535362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2018.1535362

Loue, Sana. 2017. Handbook of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work Practice and Research. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7039-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7039-1

Luckmann, Thomas. 1979. “The Structural Conditions of Religious Consciousness in Modern Society.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6(1-2): 121–137. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.6.1-2.1979.121-137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.6.1-2.1979.121-137

McMillan, David W., and David M. Chavis. 1986. “Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory.” Journal of Community Psychology 14: 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I

Meester, Maarten. 2008. Nieuwe Spiritualiteit. Kampen: Ten Have.

Nenzén, Niklas. 2020. “The Epistemology of the ‘Great Invisibles’: A Surrealist Myth and Its Analogues in Modern Esoteric Imagination.” Aries Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 20: 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700593-02002002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700593-02002002

Netherlands Unitarian Universalist Fellowship. n.d. “Home.” https://www.nuuf.nl

Nooyen, Elly. 2016. Hart voor Tao: Lao Zi’s Gids voor Universele Wijsheid [Heart for Tao: Lao Zi’s Guide to Universal Wisdom]. Haarlem: Rozekruis Pers.

Oostveen, Daan F. 2019. “Religious Belonging in the East Asian Context: An Exploration of Rhizomatic Belonging.” Religions 10 (3): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030182

———. 2020. “Hermeneutical Explorations of Multiple Religious Belonging.” PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Phan, Peter C. 2003. “Multiple Religious Belonging: Opportunities and Challenges for Theology and the Church.” Theological Studies 64: 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390306400302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390306400302

Postill, John. 2008. “Localizing the Internet beyond Communities and Networks.” New Media & Society 10(3): 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089416

Rajkumar, Peniel Jesudason Rufus, and Joseph Prabhakar Dayam. 2016. Many Yet One? Multiple Religious Belonging. Geneva: WCC Publications.

Ramsay, Tamasin. 2020. “Making a Model of Madhuban: The Brahma Kumaris’ Journey to and Presence in Europe.” In Handbook of Hinduism in Europe, edited by Knut A. Jacobsen and Ferdinando Sardella, 528–554. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432284_018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432284_018

Reich, Stephanie M. 2010. “Adolescents’ Sense of Community on Myspace and Facebook: A Mixed-Methods Approach.” Journal of Community Psychology 38 (6): 688–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20389

Rijckenborgh, Jan van, and Catharose de Petri. 1987. De Chinese Gnosis: Gnostisch Commentaar op de Tao Teh King. Haarlem: Rozekruis Pers.

Sarason, Seymour B. 1974. The Psychological Sense of Community: Perspectives for Community Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2020. “Why Live with Only One Religion? Some Notes on the Phenomenon of Multi-Religious Identity.” Studies in Interreligious Dialogue 30(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2143/SID.30.1.3288646

Sinikka Dixon, A, L. 1999. “The Hidden Community: Spatial Dimensions of Urban Life.” In Research in Community Sociology 9, edited by Dan A. Chekki, 287–308. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.

Slomp, Jan. 2007. De Soefi Beweging. Kampen: Uitgeverij Kok.

Smart, Ninian. 1998. Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Soefi Beweging Nederland. n.d. “Soeficentrum Amsterdam.” https://www.soefi.nl/centrasitemap/centrum-amsterdam

Taylor, Charles. 1991. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

VG Amsterdam. n.d. “Programma.” https://www.vgamsterdam.nl

Voss Roberts, Michelle. 2010. “Religious Belonging and the Multiple.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 26(1): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.2979/fsr.2010.26.1.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/fsr.2010.26.1.43

Vrijzinnigen Bennekom. n.d. “Welkom.” https://deontmoetingbennekom.nl

Walliss, John. 2002. The Brahma Kumaris as a ‘Reflexive Tradition’: Responding to Late Modernity. London/New York: Ashgate Publishing.

Wellman, Barry. 2002. “Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism.” In Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, edited by Makato Tanabe, Peter van den Besselaar, and Toru Ishida, 10–25. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45636-8_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45636-8_2

Zonneveld, Jacques, and Chris Nigten. 1998. Europeans in The Hague. The Hague: SDU Publishing.

Published

2022-07-15

How to Cite

Hendriks, J., & van der Braak, A. (2022). Multiple Religious Belonging and Religious Communities: Exploring a Neglected Dimension. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology, 6(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.19596

Issue

Section

Articles