Multiple Religious Belonging and Religious Communities
Exploring a Neglected Dimension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.19596Keywords:
multiple religious belonging, dual belonging, religious plurality, multireligiosity, religious communities, rhizomatic belongingAbstract
This contribution investigates the concept “community” as a previously underexplored dimension of multiple religious belonging (MRB). A review of the MRB approach to multireligiosity reveals there has been paid relatively little attention to community influence and fluid, non-dualistic styles of religious belonging. We argue that these styles of multiple belonging cannot be accounted for by conventional understandings of MRB that assume a “World Religions Paradigm.” After reviewing two approaches to this problem, the article explores a rhizomatic approach to MRB and religious communities. To illustrate this approach, a brief review of several Dutch multireligious communities is presented.
References
Allport, Gordon W., and J. Michael Ross. 1967. “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
Batson, C. Daniel. 1976. “Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent?” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 15: 29–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384312
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Berghuijs, Joantine. 2017. “Multiple Religious Belonging in the Netherlands: An Empirical Approach to Hybrid Religiosity.” Open Theology 3 (1): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0003
Berghuijs, Joantine, Hans Schilderman, André van der Braak, and Manuela Kalsky. 2018. “Exploring Single and Multiple Religious Belonging.” Journal of Empirical Theology 31(1): 18–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341365
Bidwell, Duane R. 2018. When One Religion Isn’t Enough: The Lives of Spiritually Fluid People. Boston: Beacon Press.
Bolsenbroek, Anouk. 2008. “Humanistische Stromingen: Ontwikkelingslijnen en Perspectieven.” PhD diss., Universiteit voor Humanistiek, Utrecht.
Boogaard, Raymond van den. 2018. De Religieuze Rebellen van de Vrije Gemeente. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bas Lubberhuizen.
Brahma Kumaris Spirituele Academie. n.d. “Home.” https://www.bksa.org
Braak, André van der. 2017. “Zen-Christian Dual Belonging and the Practice of Apophasis: Strategies of Meeting Rose Drew’s Theological Challenge.” Open Theology 3(1): 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0034
Braak, André van der, and Manuela Kalsky, eds. 2017. Topical Issue of Multiple Religious Belonging. Open Theology 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0051
Broadfoot, Kirsten J., Debashish Munshi, and Natalie Nelson-Marsh. 2010. “COMMUNEcation: A Rhizomatic Tale of Participatory Technology, Postcoloniality and Professional Community.” New Media & Society 12 (5): 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809348880
Bruce, Steve. 2017. “Multiple Religious Belonging: Conceptual Advance or Secularization Denial?” Open Theology 3 (1): 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0047
Cormier, Dave. 2008. “Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum.” Innovate: Journal of Online Education 4(5).
Cornille, Catherine, ed. 2002. Many Mansions? Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.
Cotter, Christopher, and David G. Robertson, eds. 2016. After World Religions: Reconstructing World Religions. London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688046
Dalton, James H., Maurice J. Elias, and Abraham Wandersman. 2001. Community Psychology: Linking Individuals and Communities. Stamford: Wadsworth.
D’Costa, Gavin, and Ross Thompson. 2016. Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmations, Objections, Explorations. Farnham/Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562735
D’Costa, Gavin. 2016. “A Roman Catholic Approach to Buddhist-Christian ‘Double Belonging’.” In Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmations, Objections, Explorations, edited by Gavin D’Costa and Ross Thompson, 107–122. Farnham/Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562735-7
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1980. Mille Plateaux: Capitalisme et Schizophrénie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
De Poort. n.d. “Home.” https://www.cursuscentrumdepoort.nl
Dobbelaere, Karel. 1999. “Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization.” Sociology of Religion 60(3): 229–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711935
Drew, Rose. 2011. Buddhist and Christian? An Exploration of Dual Belonging. New York: Routledge.
Dunham, Laura, R. Edward Freeman, and Jeanne Liedtka. 2012. “Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community.” Business Ethics Quarterly 16(1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20061611
Fernback, Jan. 2007. “Beyond the Diluted Community Concept: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective on Online Social Relations.” New Media & Society 9(1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444807072417
Glock, Charles Y., and Rodney Stark. 1965. Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Goossaert, Vincent, and David A. Palmer. 2011. The Religious Question in Modern China. London/Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304182.001.0001
Groot, Kees de, Jos Pieper, and Willem Putman, eds. 2013. Zelf Zorgen voor Je Ziel: De Actualiteit van Christelijke Spirituele Centra. Almere: Parthenon.
Halman, Loek, and Veerle Draulans. 2004. “Religious Beliefs and Practices in Contemporary Europe.” In European Values at the Turn of the Millennium, edited by Wil Arts and Loek Halman, 283–316. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047405900_015
Harris, Mark W. 2018. Historical Dictionary of Unitarian Universalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hart, Joep de, and Paul Dekker. 2015. “Floating Believers: Dutch Seekers and the Church.” In A Catholic Minority Church in a World of Seekers, edited by Staf Hellemans and Peter Jonkers, 71–96. Washington: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Hedges, Paul. 2017. “Multiple Religious Belonging after Religion: Theorising Strategic Religious Participation in a Shared Religious Landscape as a Chinese Model.” Open Theology 3 (1): 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0005
Hendriks, Jonatan. 2020. “Exploring Multiple Community Belonging: An Interdisciplinary Comparison of Community Markers.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies 15 (2): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v15i02/81-99
Hillery, George A. 1955. “Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement.” Rural Sociology 20: 111–123.
Hirschi, Travis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Introvigne, Massimo. 2003. “Lectorium Rosicrucianum: A Dutch Movement Becomes International.” In New Religions in a Postmodern World, edited by Reender Kranenborg and Mikael Rothstein, 11–22. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Jironet, Karin. 2002. The Image of Spiritual Liberty in the Western Sufi Movement Following Hazrat Inayat Khan. Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters.
Kalsky, Manuela. 2017. “Flexible Believers in the Netherlands: A Paradigm Shift toward Transreligious Multiplicity.” Open Theology 3 (1): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0027
Krijger, Tom-Eric. 2019. The Eclipse of Liberal Protestantism in the Netherlands. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410084
Lähdesmäki, Tuuli, Tuija Saresma, Kaisa Hiltunen, Saara Jäntti, Nina Sääskilahti, Antti Vallius, and Kaisa Ahvenjärvi. 2016. “Fluidity and Flexibility of ‘Belonging’: Uses of the Concept in Contemporary Research.” Acta Sociologica 29: 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699316633099
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lectorium Rosicrucianum. n.d. “Wat is het Rozenkruis?” https://www.rozenkruis.nl
Lee, David, and Howard Newby. 1983. The Problem of Sociology: An Introduction to the Discipline. London: Hutchinson.
Le Grand, Hans. 2019. “Gordon Kaufman and a Theology for the Seeker.” Religions 10(8): 480–500. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080480
Liefbroer, Anke I., André van der Braak, and Manuela Kalsky. 2018. “Multiple Religious Belonging among Visitors of Dominican Spiritual Centers in the Netherlands.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 33(3): 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2018.1535362
Loue, Sana. 2017. Handbook of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work Practice and Research. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7039-1
Luckmann, Thomas. 1979. “The Structural Conditions of Religious Consciousness in Modern Society.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6(1-2): 121–137. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.6.1-2.1979.121-137
McMillan, David W., and David M. Chavis. 1986. “Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory.” Journal of Community Psychology 14: 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
Meester, Maarten. 2008. Nieuwe Spiritualiteit. Kampen: Ten Have.
Nenzén, Niklas. 2020. “The Epistemology of the ‘Great Invisibles’: A Surrealist Myth and Its Analogues in Modern Esoteric Imagination.” Aries Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 20: 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700593-02002002
Netherlands Unitarian Universalist Fellowship. n.d. “Home.” https://www.nuuf.nl
Nooyen, Elly. 2016. Hart voor Tao: Lao Zi’s Gids voor Universele Wijsheid [Heart for Tao: Lao Zi’s Guide to Universal Wisdom]. Haarlem: Rozekruis Pers.
Oostveen, Daan F. 2019. “Religious Belonging in the East Asian Context: An Exploration of Rhizomatic Belonging.” Religions 10 (3): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030182
———. 2020. “Hermeneutical Explorations of Multiple Religious Belonging.” PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Phan, Peter C. 2003. “Multiple Religious Belonging: Opportunities and Challenges for Theology and the Church.” Theological Studies 64: 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390306400302
Postill, John. 2008. “Localizing the Internet beyond Communities and Networks.” New Media & Society 10(3): 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089416
Rajkumar, Peniel Jesudason Rufus, and Joseph Prabhakar Dayam. 2016. Many Yet One? Multiple Religious Belonging. Geneva: WCC Publications.
Ramsay, Tamasin. 2020. “Making a Model of Madhuban: The Brahma Kumaris’ Journey to and Presence in Europe.” In Handbook of Hinduism in Europe, edited by Knut A. Jacobsen and Ferdinando Sardella, 528–554. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432284_018
Reich, Stephanie M. 2010. “Adolescents’ Sense of Community on Myspace and Facebook: A Mixed-Methods Approach.” Journal of Community Psychology 38 (6): 688–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20389
Rijckenborgh, Jan van, and Catharose de Petri. 1987. De Chinese Gnosis: Gnostisch Commentaar op de Tao Teh King. Haarlem: Rozekruis Pers.
Sarason, Seymour B. 1974. The Psychological Sense of Community: Perspectives for Community Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2020. “Why Live with Only One Religion? Some Notes on the Phenomenon of Multi-Religious Identity.” Studies in Interreligious Dialogue 30(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2143/SID.30.1.3288646
Sinikka Dixon, A, L. 1999. “The Hidden Community: Spatial Dimensions of Urban Life.” In Research in Community Sociology 9, edited by Dan A. Chekki, 287–308. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
Slomp, Jan. 2007. De Soefi Beweging. Kampen: Uitgeverij Kok.
Smart, Ninian. 1998. Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Soefi Beweging Nederland. n.d. “Soeficentrum Amsterdam.” https://www.soefi.nl/centrasitemap/centrum-amsterdam
Taylor, Charles. 1991. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
VG Amsterdam. n.d. “Programma.” https://www.vgamsterdam.nl
Voss Roberts, Michelle. 2010. “Religious Belonging and the Multiple.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 26(1): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.2979/fsr.2010.26.1.43
Vrijzinnigen Bennekom. n.d. “Welkom.” https://deontmoetingbennekom.nl
Walliss, John. 2002. The Brahma Kumaris as a ‘Reflexive Tradition’: Responding to Late Modernity. London/New York: Ashgate Publishing.
Wellman, Barry. 2002. “Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism.” In Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, edited by Makato Tanabe, Peter van den Besselaar, and Toru Ishida, 10–25. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45636-8_2
Zonneveld, Jacques, and Chris Nigten. 1998. Europeans in The Hague. The Hague: SDU Publishing.
