Religious Heterogamy in Xiamen

The Social and Ritual Boundaries of Chinese Protestantism

Authors

  • Bram Colijn Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.33595

Keywords:

boundaries, ritual, religious heterogamy, Chinese Protestantism

Abstract

Many young Protestants in the Chinese city of Xiamen marry a non-Christian spouse. How does religious heterogamy illuminate the social and ritual boundaries created by Protestants in Xiamen? Considering the function and permeability of these metaphoric boundaries, how should we visualize them? This article draws on data collected between August 2014 and February 2016. Intermarriage with non-Christians is condemned by most ministers in Xiamen, but it is an essential option for young women who far outnumber marriageable men in most church communities. The resulting weddings are marked by a search for compromises among the bride and groom, their parents, and the social communities for whom their parents host the wedding. It is argued that in terms of function and permeability, the social and ritual boundaries of Protestantism in Xiamen are less like barbed-wire fences than like the gates of a subway system, or the emergency exit of a shopping mall. Since a central aim of Chinese Protestants is to recruit more people to the faith, there is room for women to briefly exit the community and to re-enter with a converted husband. This focus on boundaries as metaphors may contribute to the field of interreligious studies, where boundaries are a key concept.

Author Biography

Bram Colijn, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

 Ph.D Student, Faculty of Theology

References

Beyer, P. 2003. “Social Forms of Religion and Religions in Contemporary Global Society.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by M. Dillon, 45–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807961.004

Cao, N.L. 2011. Constructing China’s Jerusalem: Christians, Power, and Place in Contemporary Wenzhou. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Cao N. 2005. “The Church as a Surrogate Family for Working Class Immigrant Chinese Youth: An Ethnography of Segmented Assimilation.” Sociology of Religion 66(2): 183–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/4153085

Chau, A.Y. 2006. Miraculous Response: Doing Popular Religion in Contempo¬rary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chau, A.Y. 2012. “Efficacy, not Confessionality: On Ritual Polytropy in China.” In Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Re¬lations around Holy Places, edited by Glenn Bowman, 79–96. New York: Berghahn.

———. 2013. “A Different Kind of Religious Diversity: Ritual Service Provid¬ers and Consumers in China.” In Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought, edited by Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Joachim Gentz, 141–154. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318503

Dean, K. 1993. Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Duara, P. (1996). Rescuing History from the Nation. Questioning Narratives of Modern China. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Durkheim, É. 1976 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: Allen & Unwin.

Goossaert, V. and Palmer, D.A. 2011. The Religious Question in Modern Chi¬na. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/ chicago/9780226304182.001.0001

Grimes, R.L. 2014. The Craft of Ritual Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunter, A. and Chan, K.K. 1993. Protestantism in Contemporary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627989

Kao, C.Y. 2013. “The Cultural Revolution and the Emergence of Pentecostal-style Protestantism in China.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 24(2): 171– 188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537900902816657

Lagerwey, J. 2010. China: A Religious State. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Lamont, M. and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Scienc¬es.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 67–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/an¬nurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Loewenthal, K.M., A. K. MacLeod, and M. Cinnirella. 2002. “Are women more religious than men? Gender differences in religious activity among differ¬ent religious groups in the UK.” Personality and Individual Differences 32: 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00011-3

Moyaert, M. 2015. “Introduction,” in Ritual Participation and Interreligious Di¬alogue: Boundaries, Transgressions, and Innovations, edited by Moyaert M. and J. Geldhof, 1–16. London: Bloomsbury.

Overmeyer, D.L. 2003. “Religion in China Today: Introduction.” The China Quarterly 174: 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009443903000196

Seligman, A.B., M. J. Puett, R. P. Weller, and B. Simon. 2008. Ritual and its Con¬sequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195336009.001.0001

Sun, Y.F. 2017. “The Rise of Protestantism in Post-Mao China: State and Reli¬gion in Historical Perspective.” American Journal of Sociology 122(6): 1664–1725. https://doi.org/10.1086/691718

Xu X., Ji J., and Y. Y. Tung. 2000. “Social and Political Assortative Mating in Urban China,” Journal of Family Issues 21(1): 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021001003

Yang F. 2005. “Lost in the Market, Saved at McDonald’s: Conversion to Christi¬anity in Urban China.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44(4): 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00295.x

Yang, M. M. 2008. “Introduction.” In Chinese Religiosities: Afflictions of Moder¬nity and State Formation, edited by M. M. Yang, 1-40. London: University of California Press.

Published

2017-09-21

How to Cite

Colijn, B. (2017). Religious Heterogamy in Xiamen: The Social and Ritual Boundaries of Chinese Protestantism. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology, 1(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.33595

Issue

Section

Articles