Intercultural Theology and the Historicity of Thinking

Reconstructing the Current German Discussion in Philosophical Perspective

Authors

  • Dirk-Martin Grube Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.31380

Keywords:

Schmidt-Leukel, transmission-centered approach, Ustorf, neo-Kantianism, ethnocentricity, historicisty, (Christian) Other, Feldtkeller, Küster

Abstract

In this article, I analyze the German-speaking discussion on the discipline of Intercultural Theology. Among others, I criticize Schmidt-Leukel’s suggestion to define it as interreligious theology. This definition being somewhat arbitrary, I suggest reconstructing it under the parameters of philosophical and cultural insights that acknowledge the historicity of thinking and the ethnocentricity of justification. This move allows to allows “transmission-centered approaches” to be replaced by “context-sensitive” ones that honor the subject status of the Christian Other.

Author Biography

Dirk-Martin Grube, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Dirk-Martin Grube, Ph.D. 1991 (Temple University, Philadelphia), Habilitation 1999 (University of Kiel, Germany), Chair of Religious Diversity and the Epistemology of Theology/Religion at VU University, Amsterdam, works at the intersection between philosophy and theology. He has published and edited monographs on Christology, ethics, contingency, Paul Tillich, Joseph Margolis and more than fifty articles on Alvin Plantinga, William James, Thomas Kuhn, (New) Atheism, et al. Most recently, he has edited a special issue on Religious Diversity: Philosophical Perspectives, International Journal of Philosophy & Theology 76(5) and the anthology Interpretation and Meaning in Philosophy and Religion (Brill 2016)

References

Bernstein, Richard. 1988. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneu¬tics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Cohen, Hermann. 2005. Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. System der Philosophie: Erster Theil. Fourth Edition (reprint). Hildesheim: Olms.

Davidson, Donald. 1984. “Radical Interpretation.” In Inquiries into Truth and Inter¬pretation, edited by D. Davidson, 125–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feldtkeller, Andreas. 2013. “Missionswissenschaft und Interkulturelle Theologie: Eine Verhältnisbestimmung.” Theologische Literaturzeitung 138: 3–12.

Grube, Dirk-Martin. 2013. “Interpreting Kuhn’s Incommensurability-Thesis: Its Dif¬ferent Meanings and Epistemological Consequences.” Philosophy Study 3(5): 377?398.

———. 2015. “Justified Religious Difference: A Constructive Approach to Reli¬gious Diversity.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76(5): 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1166682

Hacking, Ian. 1975. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Ear¬ly Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hock, Klaus. 2011. Einführung in die Interkulturelle Theologie. Darmstadt: Wissen¬schaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Kant, Immanuel. 2008. Was ist Aufklärung? Thesen und Definitionen. Edited by Eberhard Bahr: Stuttgart: Reclam.

Krausz, Michael/Meiland, Jack W., editors. 1982. Relativism. Cognitive and Moral. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Krausz, Michael, editor. 2010. Relativism. A Contemporary Anthology. New York: Columbia Press.

Küster, Volker. 2001. “Interkulturelle Theologie.” In Religion in Geschichte und Ge¬genwart, 197–199. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

———. 2011. Einführung in die Interkulturelle Theologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Margolis, Joseph. 1995. Historied Thought, Constructed World World: A Concep¬tual Primer for the Turn of the Millenium. Berkeley: University of Cali¬fornia Press.

——. 2005. “Missionswissenschaft als Interkulturelle Theologie und ihr Verhält¬nis zur Religionswissenschaft.” Zeitschrift für Mission 31: 376–382 http:// dgmw.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2015/12/Text_07_16.10.12_DG¬MW-Papier.pdf

Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625398

Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2011. “Interkulturelle Theologie als interreligiöse Theo¬logie.” Evangelische Theologie 71(1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.14315/ evth-2011-71-1-4

Sinner, Rudolf von. 2013. “Wrogemann.” Theologische Literaturzeitung 138(4): 518–520.

Ustorf, Werner. 2011. “The Cultural Origins of ‘Intercultural Theology.’ ” In Inter¬cultural Theology: Approaches and Themes, edited by Mark J. Cartledge and David A. Cheetham, 11–28. London: SCM.

———. 2012. “Küster.” Theologische Literaturzeitung 137(12): 1407–1408.

Werner, Dietrich. 2011. “Theological Education in the Changing Context of World Christianity: An Unfinished Agenda. Global and Ecumenical Perspectives from the Edinburgh 2010 Process and Beyond.” Rethinking Mission. http:// www.rethinkingmission.org.uk/pdfs/Werner_December

Wrogemann, Henning. 2012. Interkulturelle Theologie und Hermeneutik. Grundfragen, aktuelle Beispiele, theoretische Perspektiven. Gütersloh: Gütersloher.

Published

2017-03-27

How to Cite

Grube, D.-M. (2017). Intercultural Theology and the Historicity of Thinking: Reconstructing the Current German Discussion in Philosophical Perspective. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology, 1(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.31380

Issue

Section

Articles