Book Forum
A Discussion of James L. Cox’s A Phenomenology of Indigenous Religions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/irt.25296Keywords:
Sympathetic interpolation, definitions, typologies, contextual, memory, sacred, Indigenous, agency, relationality, Religious Studies, World Religions, Paradigm, Phenomenology, Methodologies, ReflexivityAbstract
On 12 October 2022, a seminar was held in the University of Edinburgh to review, discuss and critique James L. Cox’s book, A Phenomenology of Indigenous Religions: Theory and Practice (2022, Bloomsbury). This article contains revised papers from that event as prepared by the speakers, including Cox’s introduction and response to the presentations. The papers explore various themes, comprising a consideration of Religious Studies as a discipline, Indigenous Religions and the World Religions Paradigm, issues surrounding the formulation of research questions, the role of a researcher in relation to those being researched, the notion of the ‘sacred’ in the study of Indigenous Religions, and questions about who can be classified as a phenomenologist of religion. Cox responds to each of these issues by emphasizing local agency among Indigenous groups as the key concept undergirding what he calls ‘relational research’. The participants’ papers, which have been revised for publication in this article, are presented in the order they were delivered at the seminar.
References
Alphen, E. J. van. 1991. ‘The Other Within’, in R. Corbey and J. Th. Leerssen (eds.) Alterity, Identity, Image: Selves and Others in Society and Scholarship (Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.): 1–16.
Bleeker, C. J. 1972. ‘The Contribution of the Phenomenology of Religion to the Study of the History of Religions’, in U. Bianchi, C. J. Bleeker, and A. Bausani (eds.) Problems and Methods of the History of Religions (Leiden: E. J. Brill): 35–54.
Capps, Walter H. 1995. Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press).
Cox, James L. 1992. Expressing the Sacred: An Introduction to the Phenomenology of Religion (Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications).
———. 1996. Expressing the Sacred: An Introduction to the Phenomenology of Religion, 2nd edn. (Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications).
———. 2006. A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates (London: T & T Clark [Continuum]).
———. 2007. From Primitive to Indigenous: The Academic Study of Indigenous Religions (Aldershot, England: Ashgate).
———. 2010. An Introduction to the Phenomenology of Religion (London and New York: Continuum).
——— (ed.). 2013. Critical Reflections on Indigenous Religions (Aldershot: Ashgate).
———. 2014. The Invention of God in Indigenous Societies (Durham: Acumen [Routledge]).
———. 2015. ‘Religious Memory as a Conveyor of Authoritative Tradition: The Necessary and Essential Component in a Definition of Religion’, Journal of the Irish Association for the Academic Study of Religions 2.1: 5–23.
———. 2018. Restoring the Chain of Memory: T. G. H. Strehlow and the Repatriation of Australian Indigenous Knowledge (Sheffield, UK and Bristol, CT: Equinox).
———. 2022. A Phenomenology of Indigenous Religions: Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Advances in Religious Studies. (London and New York: Bloomsbury).
Elkin, A. P. 1975. ‘Reviews: Songs of Central Australia’, Oceania 45.3: 245–47.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies (New York: Oxford University Press).
Fujiwara, Satoko, David Thurfjell, and Steven Engler (eds.). 2021. Global Phenomenologies of Religion: An Oral History in Interviews (Sheffield, UK: Equinox).
Hervieu-Léger, Danièle. 1999. ‘Religion as Memory: Reference to Tradition and the Constitution of a Heritage of Belief in Modern Societies’, in J. G. Platvoet and A. L. Molendijk (eds.) The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts and Contests (Leiden: Brill): 73–92.
———. 2000. Religion as a Chain of Memory (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Kenny, Anna 2005. ‘A Sketch Portrait: Carl Strehlow’s German Editor Baron Moritz von Leonhardi’, in Anna Kenny and Scott Mitchell (eds.) Collaboration and Language: Strehlow Research Centre, Occasional Paper no. 4 (Alice Springs: Northern Territory Government): 54–70.
Kristensen, W. Brede. 1960. The Meaning of Religion: Lectures in the Phenomenology of Religion, trans. John Carman (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).
Leeuw, Gerardus van der. 1938. Religion in Essence and Manifestation: A Study in Phenomenology, trans. J. E. Turner. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd).
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse of Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia (New York: Oxford University Press).
McKenzie, Peter R. 1997. Hail Orisha!: A Phenomenology of a West African Religion in the Mid-Nineteenth Century (Leiden: Brill).
Malik, Kenan. 2007. ‘Who Owns Knowledge?’, Index on Censorship 36 (3): 156–67.
Otto, Rudolf. 1926. The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, 4th impr./ revised with additions, (New York: Oxford University Press).
Schmidt, Bettina E. 2019. ‘Review of James L. Cox, Restoring the Chain of Memory: T. G. H. Strehlow and the Repatriation of Australian Indigenous Knowledge’, British Association for the Study of Religions Bulletin 134: 22–23. (https://issuu.com/davidrobertson59/docs/bulletin_134).
Smart, Ninian. 1984. ‘Scientific Phenomenology and Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s Misgivings’, in Frank Whaling (ed.) The World’s Religious Traditions: Current Perspectives in Religious Studies (Edinburgh: T&T Clark): 257–69.
Strehlow, T. G. H. 1947. Aranda Traditions. (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press).
———. 1971. Songs of Central Australia. (Sydney: Angus and Robertson).
———. 1978. Central Australian Religion: Personal Monototemism in a Polytotemic Community. Australian Association for the Study of Religions. Special Studies in Religions Series, vol. 2. (Bedford Park, South Australia: Flinders University).
Sutcliffe, Steven J. 2008. ‘Historiography and Disciplinary Formation: The Case of “Religious Studies”’, in S. Oliver and M. Warrier (eds.) Theology and Religious Studies: An Exploration of Disciplinary Boundaries (London: T. and T. Clark/Continuum): 101–118.
———. 2020. ‘“What’s in a Name”? The Case for “Study of Religions”’, Religion 50.1: 129–36.
Thomas, Terence. 1999. Paul Tillich and World Religions. (Cardiff: Cardiff Academic Press).
———. 2004 [1994]. ‘“The Sacred” as a Viable Concept in the Contemporary Study of Religions’. In Steven J. Sutcliffe (ed.), Religion: Empirical Studies. (Aldershot: Ashgate): 47–66.
Thurfjell, David. 2022. ‘Semantic Confusions and the Mysteries of Life: An Interview with Ulf Drobin (Sweden)’, in S. Fujiwara, D. Thurfjell, and S. Engler (eds.) Global Phenomenologies of Religion: An Oral History in Interviews. (Sheffield UK and Bristol CT: Equinox) 29–49.
Turner, Victor. 1985. ‘Liminality, Kabbalah and Media’, Religion 15: 205–17.
Tynan, Lauren. 2021. ‘What Is Relationality? Indigenous Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities with Kin’, Cultural Geographies 28.4: 597–610.
Wiebe, Donald (ed.). 1986. Concept and Empathy: Essays in the Study of Religion by Ninian Smart. (New York: New York University Press).
