TOWARD A GENDER INCLUSIVE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE

Authors

  • John F. Crosby University and the University of Kentucky

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v19i2.99

Keywords:

humanism, gay marriage, law, ethics

Abstract

My purpose in this paper is to set forth a case for inclusion, without any restriction whatsoever, of gays and lesbians in the legal definition of marriage within the various jurisdictions within the United States of America. Historical and cross cultural definitions of marriage are usually based on two basic premises or components, structure and function. Structural definitions of marriage, with which most people and jurisdictions identify, are based on exclusion and inclusion, i.e. on who is eligible for inclusion and who must be excluded. Ordinarily the restrictions exclude those not having reached the age of majority, those who are not judged mentally competent, and those of the same gender. Functional definitions of marriage are based on the willingness of the partners to engage in the duties and responsibilities to each other and to all offspring regardless of their physical or mental fitness. I intend to defend the proposition that legal marriage for gays and lesbians is better defined and defended when based on function rather than structure. Specifically, this means that marriage is the union of those who 1.) without mental equivocation embrace their mutual commitment to support and care for each other; 2.) are of legal age; 3.) are of sound mind; and 4.) affirm their commitment to fulfill, to the best of their ability, the following functions as they pertain to the natural birth, legal adoption, or foster care of any and all children included in the marital union: These functions include but are not limited to: protection (physical and mental), economic, affect-giving, socialization, acculturation, education, and sexual access between the conjugal partners. Historically, there is no record throughout the history of humankind, of any state or body politic that does not profess a vested interest in the mate selection patterns of its young. This is not generally for the edification of the married, but rather for the assurance of the socialization and acculturation of the ascending generation.

Author Biography

  • John F. Crosby, University and the University of Kentucky

    John F. Crosby is a philosophy major at Denison University (BA) and a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary (BD). He was an ordained Presbyterian minister for eleven years in three different pastoral venues prior to experiencing a crisis of faith. Crosby demitted the ministry and did a Ph.D. at Syracuse University in Marriage and Family Relations with clinical training in the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy. Crosby has been a clinical member of AAMFT since 1972 and has served on the faculties of Indiana University and the University of Kentucky where he was also Chairman of the Department of Family Studies for seven years. He holds teaching awards from both Indiana University and the University of Kentucky and is the author/editor of thirteen books, the most recent being The Flipside of Godspeak: Theism As Constructed Reality, (Wipf & Stock, Eugene, Oregon, 2007).

References

.

Published

2013-10-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Crosby, J. F. (2013). TOWARD A GENDER INCLUSIVE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 19(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v19i2.99