RADICAL CONSTRUCTIVISM AND THEOLOGICAL EPISTEMOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v18i1.1Keywords:
Immanuel Kant, theology, ConstructionismAbstract
Theology and religious beliefs, including issues dealing with theism, deism, creedal statements, dogma, and spiritualism are considered to be constructed reality. They are herein identified as first order truth. First order truth is personal truth and, as such, it becomes part of the reality of the believer. Constructed theological and religious belief is considered to be a legitimate part of radical constructivism irrespective of the validity and viability of the constructed reality. Second order truth, truth that is beyond the limits of human verification, is herein introduced as the term for ultimate ontological and metaphysical reality. As such, reality is neither denied nor is it attributed to a solipsistic mind. Ultimate and so-called metaphysical reality is unknowable in the epistemological sense of having the capability of being known in any empirical and verifiable manner. To the degree that ultimate and metaphysical reality is known, it is known only via the constructs of the human mind. Perceptions of reality that arise from rigorous empirical research, including experimental and observational data, are certainly to be considered valid, reliable, and viable, but never irreplaceable. In the practice of science and the scientific method there is always the possibility of new hypotheses and theories based on new experimentation and new data, and thus, a case may be made that all knowledge, even scientific and empirical knowledge, is tentative.
References
Barth, K. (1963). Evangelical Theology: An Introduction. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. (Translated 1979. Foley, G., Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Erdmans Publishing.)
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, N Y: Doubleday.
Berkeley, George, 1710. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. (Barnes & Noble Publishing, Inc. 2006.)
Crosby, J. F. (2007). The Flipside of Godspeak: Theism As Constructed Reality. Eugene, Oregon: A Resource Publication, Wipf and Stock.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as Natural Phenomena. New York: Viking Penguin.
Dewey, J. (1934) A Common Faith. New Haven: Yale University Press. p.9.
Gehman, H. S. (1970) The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, p. 801;145-146.
Gergen, K. J (1994). Realities and Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harris, S. (2004). The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Hitchens, C. (2007). god is not Great: How Religion Poisens Everything. New York: Twelve Book Group.
Jones, W. T. (1952). A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. (pp. 208-209).
Kant, I. (1781) Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn, New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004.(p. 141)
______ Critique of Judgment. Translated by J. H. Bernard. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2005.
Locke, J. (1689). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Frazer, A. C. (ED.) 2004. Barnes & Noble. Book IV, X. Of Our Knowledge of the Existence of a God.
May, R. (1953). Man’s Search For Himself, New York: W. W. Norton, (Chapter 6, Section 4, The Person’s Power To Do The Valuing).
Neimeyer, R. A. (1995). An invitation to constructivist psychotherapies. In R. A. Neimeyer & M. J. Mahoney (Eds.), Constructivism in psychotherapy . Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Paley, W. (1802). Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Boston: Gould and Lincoln, (1860 Edition).
Randall, J. H. and Buchler, J. (1942). Philosophy: An Introduction. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Raskin, J. (2001). On relativism in constructivist psychology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14, 285-313.
Raskin, J. (2002). Constructivism in Psychology: Personal Construct Psychology, Radical Constructivism, and Social Constructionism. American Communications Journal, 5, 3, Spring 2002. Also in J. D. Raskin & S. K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp.1-25) New York: Pace University Press.
Tillich, P. (1952). The Courage To Be. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An Introduction to Radical Constructivism, in Watzlawick, Paul, The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp.17-40.
______ (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Routledge/Farmer.
Warren, W. (1993). The problem of religion for constructivist psychology. Journal of Psychology, 127, 5, pp. 481-488.
______ (1998) Philosophical Dimensions of Personal Construct Psychology. New York: Routledge.
