“Traditional” Exegeses of Q 4:34

Authors

  • Karen Bauer Princeton University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cisv2i2.129

Keywords:

women and Islam, Quran, exegesis

Abstract

On the whole, pre-modern scholars understand Q 4:34, Men are qawwamun over women, with what God has given the one more than the other, and with what they spend of their wealth, to legislate men’s authority over women in marriage. But verse 4:34 has never had a uniform interpretation, even in the pre-modern period. This paper explores variations in the content and methods of pre-modern and modern interpretations of Q 4:34, and attempts to understand the sources for, and meaning of, certain interpretations, particularly focusing on the interpretation of women’s deficient rationality [naqis al-‘aql], taken from a hadith [saying] on the authority of the Prophet. Ultimately, I argue that neither the sources of exegesis, nor its meaning, can be attributed simply to early interpretations or the seemingly straightforward meanings of ahadith. Rather, exegetes in every age appropriate and reinterpret their heritage, giving these sources new meanings.

References

Ali, Kecia. “Progressive Muslims and Islamic Jurisprudence: The Necessity for Critical Engagement with Marriage and Divorce Law.” In Progressive Muslims, ed. Omid Safi, 163–89. Oxford: Oneworld, 2003.

Al-Buti, M. Sa‘id Ramadan. Women Between the Tyranny of the Western System and the Mercy of Islamic Law. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr, 2003.

Blanford, Nicholas. “Syrian Reformer Rankles Islamists.” Christian Science Monitor, January 15, 2005.

Fadel, Mohammad. “Two Women, One Man.” IJMES 29, no. 2 (1997): 185–204.

Heck, Paul. “Religious Renewal in Syria: The Case of Muhammad al-Habash.” Journal of Islam and Muslim–Christian Relations 15, no. 4 (2004): 185–207. doi: 10.1080/0959641042000192792

Ibn Abi Talh­a, ‘Ali. Tafsir al-Qur’an al-karim (reconstructed from later sources), ed. Rashid ‘Abd al-Mun‘aim. Cairo: Maktabat al-Sunna, 1991.

Ibn Abi al-Qasim. al-Wadih­ fi sharh­ Mukhtasar al-Khiraqi, vol. 5, Beirut: Dar al-Khidr, 2000.

Ibn al-‘Arabi, Abu Bakr. A­hkam al-Qur’an, vol. 1, ed. Muh­ammad Bajawi. Cairo: Isa al-Babi, 1967.

Al-Jassas, Abu Bakr Ahmad b. ‘Ali. A­hkam al-Qur’an, vol. 2, ed. ‘Abd al-Ra­hman Mu­hammad. Cairo: al-Matba‘a al-Bahiya, 1928.

Al-Mawardi, Abu ’l-Hasan. Adab al-dunya wa’l-din, vol. 1, ed. ‘Abdallah Ah­mad Abu Zayna. Cairo: Matba‘ Dar al-Sha‘b, n.d.

Al-Mawardi, Abu ’l-Hasan. al-Nukat wa’l-‘uyun, tafsir al-Mawardi, vol. 1, ed. Sa‘id b. ‘Abd al-Maqsur b. ‘abd al-Ra­him. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiya, 1992.

Al-Samarqandi, Abu ’l-Layth. Ba­r al-‘ulum (tafsir al-Samarqandi), vol. 1, ed. Al-Shaykh ‘Ali Muhammad Mas‘ud et al. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiya, 1993.

Sadeghi, Behnam. The Structure of Reasoning in Post-formative Jurisprudence (Case Studies in Hanafi Law on Women and Prayer). Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 2006.

Al-Sirakhsi. Kitab al-mabsut. Cairo: al-Hajj Muhammad Effendi Sasi al-Maghribi, n.d.

Slackman, Michael. “Syria Imposing Stronger Curbs on Opposition.” New York Times, April 6, 2006.

Ibn Jarir Al-Tabari. Jami ‘al-bayan ‘an ta’wil ay al-Qur’an, vol. 8, ed. Shakir and Shakir, 1950.

Zoepf, Katherine. “Islamic Revival in Syria is Led by Women.” New York Times, August 29, 2006.

Published

2008-04-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bauer, K. (2008). “Traditional” Exegeses of Q 4:34. Comparative Islamic Studies, 2(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1558/cisv2i2.129