Holiness and Impurity in the Torah and the Quran
Differences within a Common Typology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cis.v6i1-2.5Keywords:
dietary laws, chosenness, holiness, impurity, Israelites, meat, Quran, TorahAbstract
In sharp contrast to the Torah’s hierarchical conception of society, the Quran articulates an egalitarian worldview in which all humanity has equal access to the holiness that comes from being in relationship with God. Quranic egalitarianism serves to undermine Biblically-grounded Jewish and Christian claims to elevated status. The significant differences in Quranic and Biblical discourse about both holiness and the antithetical state of impurity, however, can best be understood as existing within the framework of a common typology. Both the Torah and the Quran distinguish between impurity that results from physiological events and impurity caused by sin. These works, moreover, describe in similar ways the entirely different implications of these two types of impurity for a person’s relationship with God. This essay demonstrates how the juxtaposition of the Torah and the Quran can enrich our understanding of these works and of broader religious phenomena.References
Arberry, A. J., trans. The Koran Interpreted. London: Allen & Udwin, 1955.
Dawood, N. J., trans. The Koran: With a Parallel Arabic Text. New York: Viking, 1990.
Doniger, Wendy. The Implied Spider: Politics and Theology in Myth. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
Fakhry, Majid, trans. An Interpretation of the Qur'an: English Translation of the Meanings, a Bilingual Edition. New York: New York University Press, 2002.
Freidenreich, David M. Foreigners and Their Food: Constructing Otherness in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
———. “The Implications of Unbelief: Tracing the Emergence of Distinctively Shi'i Notions Regarding the Food and Impurity of Non-Muslims.” Islamic Law and Society 18(2011): 53–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156851910X517074
Friedmann, Yohanan. Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497568
Gauvain, Richard. “Ritual Rewards: A Consideration of Three Recent Approaches to Sunni Purity Law.” Islamic Law and Society 12 (2005): 333–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156851905774608251
Izutsu, Toshihiko. Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur'an. 1966. Montreal & Kingston: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2002.
JPS Hebrew-English Tanakh: The Traditional Hebrew Text and the New JPS Translation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 1999.
Katz, Marion Holmes. Body of Text: The Emergence of the Sunni Law of Ritual Purity. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.
———. “Cleanliness and Ablution.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an, 1: 341–344. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
Klawans, Jonathan. Impurity and Sin in Ancient Judaism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195132908.001.0001
Lane, E. W. Arabic-English Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1863.
Lightfoot, J. B., and J. R. Harmer, eds. The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations of Their Writings. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1992.
Lowry, Joseph E. “Ritual Purity.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an, 5: 498–508. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
Maghen, Ze'ev. After Hardship Cometh Ease: The Jews as Backdrop for Muslim Moderation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.
———. “Strangers and Brothers: The Ritual Status of Unbelievers in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Medieval Encounters 12 (2006): 173–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006706778884925
———. “First Blood: Purity, Edibility, and the Independence of Islamic Jurisprudence.” Islam 81 (2004): 49–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/islm.2004.81.1.49
———. “Close Encounters: Some Preliminary Observations of the Transmission of Impurity in Early Sunni Jurisprudence.” Islamic Law and Society 6 (1999): 348–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568519991223784
———. “Much Ado About Wudu'.” Islam 76 (1999): 205–252.
Milgrom, Jacob. “Israel’s Sanctuary: The Priestly ‘Picture of Dorian Gray’.” Revue Biblique 83 (1976): 390–399.
———. Leviticus 1–16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commntary. Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday, 1991.
Neusner, Jacob. Aphrahat and Judaism: The Christian-Jewish Argument in Fourth-Century Iran. Leiden: Brill, 1971.
Novatian. “Jewish Foods.” Translated by Russell J. DeSimone. In Novatian: The Trinity, The Spectacles, Jewish Food, In Praise of Purity, Letters. Fathers of the Church, Vol. 67, 137–161. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1974.
Paret, Rudi, trans. Der Koran. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1966.
Reinhart, A. Kevin. “Contamination.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an, 1: 410–412. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
———. “Impurity/No Danger.” History of Religions 30 (1990): 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/463212 // http://www.jstor.org/stable/1062790
Rubin, Uri. Between Bible and Qur'an: The Children of Israel and the Islamic Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Darwin, 1999.
Safran, Janina M. “Rules of Purity and Confessional Boundaries: Maliki Debates About the Pollution of the Christian.” History of Religions 42 (2003): 197–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/375036
Schwartz, Baruch J. “‘Profane’ Slaughter and the Integrity of the Priestly Code.” Hebrew Union College Annual 67 (1996): 15–42.
Wright, David P. “The Spectrum of Priestly Impurity.” In Priesthood and Cult in Ancient Israel, edited by Gary A. Anderson and Saul M. Olyan, 150–181. Sheffield, England: JSOT Press, 1991.
