Critics Not Caretakers...The Public Study of Religion 20+ Years In

Authors

  • Leslie Smith Avila University
  • Mitsutoshi Horii Chaucer College, UK/Shumei University
  • Suzanne Owen Leeds Trinity University
  • Titus Hjelm University of Helsinki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.28089

Keywords:

religious studies, critics not caretakers, russell mccuthceon, critical religion

Abstract

The topic of our conversation is Russell T. McCutcheon’s Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion (SUNY Press 2001). This provocative volume continues to be discussed and argued within the field, warranting an updated volume. With the release of its expanded second edition (Routledge 2024) release, the Bulletin’s editorial team thought readers would appreciate a broader conversation about the book’s impact, legacy, and potential future in framing the academic study of religion. We are joined by Leslie Smith (Avila University), Mitsutoshi Horii (Chaucer College, UK and Shumei University), Suzanne Owen (Leeds Trinity University), and Titus Hjelm (University of Helsinki) as our discussants.

References

Arnal, William and Russell McCutcheon. 2013. The Sacred is the Profane: The Political Nature of “Religion.” New York: Oxford University Press.

Baker, Keith Michael. 1994. Enlightenment and the Institution of Society: Notes for a Conceptual History. In Main Trends in Cultural History: Ten Essays, ed. Willem Melching and Wyger Velema. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi: 95–120.

Barthes, Roland. 1993 [1972]. Mythologies. London: Vintage.

Campbell, Colin. 1987. The Romantic Ethic and the Sprit of Modern Consumerism. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Diment, Maria. n.d. “Does the Language we Speak Shape the Way We Think?” ALTA. https://altalang.com/beyond-words/language-shape-thought/.

Durkheim, Emile. 2008 [1915]. The Elementary Form of Religious Life. New York: Dover Publications.

Eco, Umberto. 1983 [1980]. The Name of the Rose. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Engler, Steven. 2016. “Why be Critical? Introducing a Symposium on Capitalizing Religion.” Religion 46 (July): 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2016.1192831.

Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2003. “‘Religion’ and ‘the Secular’ in Japan: Problems in History, Social Anthropology, and Religion.” Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies. 10 July 2003. http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Fitzgerald.html.

———. 2004a. “Religion and the Secular in Japan: Problems in History.” Social Anthropology and the Study of Religion. 20 October 2004. http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Fitzgerald3.html.

———. 2004b. “The Religion-Secular Dichotomy: A Response to Responses.” Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies 6 April 2004. http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Fitzgerald2.html.

———. 2017a. Abolishing Politics, Forward. The Center for Critical Research on Religion 22 May 2017: 1–16. https://criticaltheoryofreligion.org/timothy-fitzgerald-abolishing-politics-foreword/.

———. 2017b. Abolishing Politics: Categories as Signs in an Automatic Signaling System. The Center for Critical Research on Religion. 19 September 2017. https://criticaltheoryofreligion.org/timothy-fitzgerald-abolishing-politics-categories-as-signs-in-an-automatic-signalling-system/.

Gilbert, Margaret. 1989. On Social Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goldstein, Warren S., Rebekka King and Jonathan Boyarin. 2016. “Critical Theory of Religion vs. Critical Religion.” Sage Journals 4 (February). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303216630077.

Greenwood, John D. (Ed.). 1997. The Mark of the Social: Discovery or Invention. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.

Hjelm, Titus. 2014. Social Constructionism: Approaches to the Study of the Human World. London: Bloomsbury.

———. 2020. “Mapping the Discursive Study of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 88 (October): 1002–1025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfaa045.

———. 2021. “Alternative Lenses for Qualitative Religion Research: Interstitial, Inverted, and Dialogical Approaches.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 34 (November): 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341529.

Harari, Yuval Noah. 2011. Sapiens: A Brief History of Human kind. London. Harvill Secker.

Mack, Burton. 2000. “Social Formation.” In Guide to the Study of Religion, edited by Willi Braun and Russell McCutcheon, 283–296. London: Bloomsbury.

McCutcheon, Russell. 1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse of Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. 2001. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: Sate University of New York Press.

———. 2024. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion, Second Edition. London: Routledge.

Mignolo, Walter and Catherine Walsh. 2018. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. London: Duke University Press: 105–134.

Owens, Patricia. 2015. Economy of Force: Counterinsurgency and the Historical Rise of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, Jason. 2011. “Amondawa Tribe Lacks Abstract Idea of Time, Study Says.” BBC. 20 May 2011. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13452711.

Reader, Ian. 2004a. “Ideology, Academic Inventions and Mystical Anthropology: Responding to Fitzgerald’s Polemics.” Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies. 3 March 2004. http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Reader.html.

———. 2004b. “Dichotomies, Contested Terms and Contemporary Issues in the Study of Religion.” Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies. 10 May 2004. http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Reader2.html.

Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Random House.

Schwikard, David and Hans Bernhard Schmid. 2020. “Collective Intentionality.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-intentionality/?TB_iframe=true&width=370.8&height=658.8#SpeIss.

Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.

Seth, Sanjay. 2021. Beyond Reason: Postcolonial Theory and the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sewell, William H., Jr. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Smith, Leslie Dorough. 2014. Righteous Rhetoric: Sex, Speech, and the Politics of Concerned Women for America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Storm, Jason J. 2021. Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Taira, Teemu. 2022. Taking ‘Religion’ Seriously: Essays on the Discursive Study of Religion. Leiden: Brill.

Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 2003. Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Weber, Max. 2001 [1904]. The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.

Published

2024-05-02

Issue

Section

The Conversation

How to Cite

Smith, L., Horii, M., Owen, S., & Hjelm, T. (2024). Critics Not Caretakers...The Public Study of Religion 20+ Years In. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 52(4), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.28089