To Be or Not to Be Scientific Is Not the Question
A Science Scholar’s Challenge for the Study of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.26015Keywords:
science, religion, Latour, history of ideasAbstract
In The Archive we republish an article that, in hindsight, may have been ahead of its time with its prescience. Our second pull for this issue is a 2005 piece from Lieve Orye where he discusses the intricacies of categorizing religious studies as an art or a science. He endeavors to find out if the field should be studied with a scientific approach. Orye posits that maybe this is not even a question we should be asking. This piece was originally published in Council for the Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin 34.1–2, 14–18.References
Bloor, David. 1999. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30A.1: 81–112.
Boggs, James. 2004. “The Culture Concept as Theory, in Context.” Current Anthropology 45.2: 187–209.
Fisher, Michael. 1996. “Commentary, Science in Anthropology: Definitions.” Anthropology Newsletter 37.3: 48–49.
Hammel, Eugene. 1995. “Science and Humanism in Anthropology: A View from the Balkan Pit” Anthropology Newsletter 36.8: 49, 52.
———. 1996. “Science in Anthropology: Transformations in Science and Society.” Anthropology Newsletter 37.4: 9–12.
Hess, David. 1995. “Misleading Boundaries.” Anthropology Newsletter 36.9: 44.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
———. 1993. We Have Never Been Modem. New York: Harvester.
———. 1996. “Not the Question.” Anthropology Newsletter 37.3: 1, 5.
———. 2002a. Jubiler, ou Les Tourments de la Parole Religieuse. Paris: Les Empecheurs-Le SeuiL
———. 2002b. “Le Rappel de la Modernite approaches anthropologiques.” Available online at http://www.ethnographiques.org/documents/article/arArLatour.html. Accessed on January 7, 2005.
Nader, Laura. 2001. “Anthropology! Distinguished Lecture—2000.” American Anthropologist 103.3: 609–20.
Orye, Lieve. 2005 “Reappropriating ‘religion’? Constructively reconceptualising (human) science and the study of religion. “Method and Theory in the Study of Religion.
Skomal, Susan. 1995. “Science in Anthropology.” Anthropology Newsletter 36.7: 1, 5.
Traweek, Sharon. 1996. “Commentary, Science in Anthropology: Definitions.” Anthropology Newsletter 37/3: 48.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2003. AND. Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Wiebe, Donald. 1991. The Irony of Theology and the Nature of Religious Thought Montreal. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Wuthnow, Robert. 2004. “Is There a Place for ‘Scientific’ Studies of Religion?”
