Neutrality in the Study of Religion

Authors

  • John H. Whittaker Louisiana State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.20566

Keywords:

Bellah, neutrality, religious studies, critical, objectivity

Abstract

The Archive is a feature of the Bulletin in which previous publications are reprinted to reinforce the modern relevance of archived arguments. “Neutrality in the Study of Religion,” originally published in 1981, comes from Dr. John H. Whittaker (1945-2019), who was the Department Chair of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Louisiana State University until 2006. This article is relevant 30 years after its original publication, as it explores an ongoing debate in the field: the limits of objectivity in religious studies. Whittaker critiques a claim made by sociologist Robert Bellah in order to argue that religion can and should be taught from what he terms a “neutral” standpoint that encourages critical inquiry. The role of the scholar of religion as a researcher, observer, and teacher is one that remains contended across the field of religious studies today.

References

Bellah, Robert. 1970. “Confessions of a Former Estab­lishment Fundamentalist.” The Bulletin of the Council on the Study of Religion 1.3 (December): 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057367102800210

Ditties, James E. 1971. “Confessing Away the Soul with the Sins: The Risks of Uncle Thomism Among the Humanists.” The Bulletin of the Council on the Study of Religion 2.3: 22-5.

Whittaker, John H. 1978. “Causes, Reasons, and the Genetic Fallacy.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 46.3 (September). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1463806

Published

2022-01-05

Issue

Section

The Archive

How to Cite

Whittaker, J. H. (2022). Neutrality in the Study of Religion. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 50(2), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.20566