High Tech, High Think, High Imagine
Resisting the Quantification of Quality
Keywords:Jill Raitt, education, quality, quantity, pedagogy, teaching, learning, Council of Societies for the Study of Religion
Jill Raitt highlights the gap between imagination and information, shifting the conversation towards the tangible impacts of an education system that relies on test scores instead of the quality of learning and teaching. The way an individual is taught influences their perception of the unfamiliar, and thus the quantification of quality in education could lead to irreconcilable sociopolitical climates in the future. Originally published in the February 1991 issue of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin (20, no. 1), the piece continues to speak volumes today, particularly in the context of educating in the age of COVID-19.
Barrett, Michael. 1990. “The Case for More School Days.” The Atlantic 266 (5), November. https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/politics/educatio/barr2f.htm.
Brown, Peter. 1967. Augustine of Hippo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chandrasekhar, Subramanyan. 1987. Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226162775.001.0001
Crites, Stephen D.1991 . American Academy of Religion Report to the Profession: Liberal Learning and the Religion Major. Originally published in Liberal Education 77 (2).
Frend, W. H. C. 1965. The Early Church. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Pagels, Elaine. 1988. Adam, Eve, and the Serpent. New York: Random House.