Resurrected Bodies

Individual Experiences and Collective Expressions of Organ Transplant in North America


  • Arlene Macdonald University of Toronto



organ transplant, transplant discourse, transplant advocacy


The anthropological literature on transplant, though theoretically and ethnographically rich, does not address religion in any substantial way. And while bio-ethical considerations of transplant regularly address religion, treatments are generally circumscribed to a list of various faith traditions and their stance toward organ transplant. Such a presentation reduces “religion” to the world’s recognized faith traditions, “religious actors” to the official spokespersons of these traditions, and “religious belief” to moral injunctions. The objective of the thesis was to illuminate the prominent place of religion in the lived experience of transplant recipients and donors, in the public policy and professional activities of transplant officials, and in the transplant discourses of North America


Cohen, Lawrence 2003 “Where it Hurts: Indian material for an ethics of organ transplantation.” Zygon 38/3, 663-88.

Foucault, Michel 1990 [1976] The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Volume 1. New York: Random House.

Fox, Renee C. and Judith P. Swazey 1992 Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

----- 1978 The Courage to Fail: A Social View of Organ Transplants and Dialysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hogle, Linda 1999 Recovering the Nation’s Body: Cultural Memory, Medicine, and the Politics of Redemption. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Klassen, Pamela E. 2001 Blessed Events: Religion and Home Birth in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lock, Margaret 2002 Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley: University of California Press.

O’Connell, Laurence J. 2001 “The Religious and Spiritual Perspective Toward Human Organ Donation and Transplantation.” In Wayne Shelton and John Balint (eds.), The Ethics of Organ Transplantation, 277-92. Advances in Bioethics, Vol. 7. London: Elsevier Science.

Rabinow, Paul 1996 “Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality.” In Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rabinow, Paul and Nikolas Rose 2006 “Biopower Today.” BioSocieties 1, 195-217.

Roof, Wade Clark 1999 Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rose, Nikolas 2007 The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rose, Nikolas and Carlos Novas 2005 “Biological Citizenship.” In Aihwa Ong and Stephen Collier (eds), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. London: Blackwell Publishing.

Sahin, A., et al. 1990 “Different Religious Views Concerning the Dead Body.” Transplantation Proceedings 22/3, 939-51.

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy 2001“Commodity Fetishism in Organs Trafficking.” Body & Society 7/2-3, 31-62.

Schmidt, Leigh Eric 2005 Restless Souls: The Making of American Spirituality. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

Sharp, Lesley A. 2006 Strange Harvest: Organ Transplants, Denatured Bodies, and the Transformed Self. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Veatch, Robert 2000 Transplantation Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Weist, Walter E. 1991 “Introduction to Religious Perspectives.” In C. Don Keyes (ed.), New Harvest: Transplanting Body Parts and Reaping the Benefits, 181-221. Clifton, New Jersey: Humana Press.

Wuthnow, Robert 1998 After Heaven: Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.



How to Cite

Macdonald, A. (2010). Resurrected Bodies: Individual Experiences and Collective Expressions of Organ Transplant in North America. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 39(1), 3–6.