Is the Grass Greener?
A View from Biblical Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.v43i4.29Keywords:
Muhammad, JesusAbstract
This response views the Safi-Hughes debate on the "historical Muhammad" from the perspective of debates in biblical studies, particularly the quest for the historical Jesus. The main question raised is this: can the "quest for the historical Muhammad" or the "historical Jesus" ever be freed from theological concerns?
References
llison, Dale C. 2010. Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagina- tion and History. London: SPCK.
Bauckham, Richard. 2006. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids: Eerd- mans.
Blanton, Ward. 2007. Displacing Christian Origins: Philoso- phy, Secularity, and the New Testament. Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press.
Crossley, James. 2008. Jesus in an Age of Terror: Projects for a New American Century. London: Equinox.
———. 2012. Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism: Quests, Schol- arship, Ideology. London and New York: Routledge.
———. 2014. Harnessing Chaos: The Bible in English Political Discourse since 1968. London: Bloomsbury.
Graeber, David. 2014. “What’s the Point if We Can’t Have Fun?” The Baffler. http://www.thebaffler.com/arti- cles/whats-the-point-if-we-cant-have-fun.
Hoffmann, R.J., ed. 2010. Sources of the Jesus Tradition: Sepa- rating History from Myth. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Hughes, Aaron W. 2014. “When Bad Scholarship Is Just Bad Scholarship: A Response to Omid Safi.” Religion Bul- letin. http://www.equinoxpub.com/blog/2014/02/ when-bad-scholarship-is-just-bad-scholarship-a-re- sponse-to-omid-safi/.
McCutcheon, Russell T. 2001. Critics Not Caretakers: Rede- scribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Omid, Safi. 2014. “Reflections on the State of Islamic Stud- ies.” Jadaliyya. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/in- dex/16269/reflections-on-the-state-of-islamic-stud- ies.
Stoneham, Carl. 2014. “Will it Ever Be ‘Just about Bad Scholarship?’ A Response to Aaron Hughes and Omid Safi.: Bulletin for the Study of Religion blog. http://www. equinoxpub.com/blog/2014/02/will-it-ever-be-just- about-bad-scholarship-a-response-to-aaron-hughes- and-omid-safi/.
Sutton, Ed. 2014. “Fun with David Graeber.” Antidote. http://antidotezine.com/2014/02/08/fun-with- graeber/.
Theissen, Gerd, and Annette Merz. 1999. The Historical Je- sus: A Comprehensive Guide. London: SCM.
Tite, Philip L. 2014. “Rethinking Gnostic Intellectuals? Categories as Weapons and History as Construct,” Religion Bulletin. http://www.equinoxpub.com/ blog/2014/03/rethinking-gnostic-intellectuals-cate- gories-as-weapons-and-history-as-construct/.
Vermes, Geza. 1993. The Religion of Jesus the Jew. London: SCM.
Wright, N. T. 2003. Resurrection of the Son of God. London: SPCK.
———. 2014. “N. T. Wright ranks the top places for New Testament Studies.” The Jesus Blog. http://histori- caljesusresearch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/nt-wright- ranks-top-new-testament.html [no longer available]
Bauckham, Richard. 2006. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids: Eerd- mans.
Blanton, Ward. 2007. Displacing Christian Origins: Philoso- phy, Secularity, and the New Testament. Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press.
Crossley, James. 2008. Jesus in an Age of Terror: Projects for a New American Century. London: Equinox.
———. 2012. Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism: Quests, Schol- arship, Ideology. London and New York: Routledge.
———. 2014. Harnessing Chaos: The Bible in English Political Discourse since 1968. London: Bloomsbury.
Graeber, David. 2014. “What’s the Point if We Can’t Have Fun?” The Baffler. http://www.thebaffler.com/arti- cles/whats-the-point-if-we-cant-have-fun.
Hoffmann, R.J., ed. 2010. Sources of the Jesus Tradition: Sepa- rating History from Myth. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Hughes, Aaron W. 2014. “When Bad Scholarship Is Just Bad Scholarship: A Response to Omid Safi.” Religion Bul- letin. http://www.equinoxpub.com/blog/2014/02/ when-bad-scholarship-is-just-bad-scholarship-a-re- sponse-to-omid-safi/.
McCutcheon, Russell T. 2001. Critics Not Caretakers: Rede- scribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Omid, Safi. 2014. “Reflections on the State of Islamic Stud- ies.” Jadaliyya. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/in- dex/16269/reflections-on-the-state-of-islamic-stud- ies.
Stoneham, Carl. 2014. “Will it Ever Be ‘Just about Bad Scholarship?’ A Response to Aaron Hughes and Omid Safi.: Bulletin for the Study of Religion blog. http://www. equinoxpub.com/blog/2014/02/will-it-ever-be-just- about-bad-scholarship-a-response-to-aaron-hughes- and-omid-safi/.
Sutton, Ed. 2014. “Fun with David Graeber.” Antidote. http://antidotezine.com/2014/02/08/fun-with- graeber/.
Theissen, Gerd, and Annette Merz. 1999. The Historical Je- sus: A Comprehensive Guide. London: SCM.
Tite, Philip L. 2014. “Rethinking Gnostic Intellectuals? Categories as Weapons and History as Construct,” Religion Bulletin. http://www.equinoxpub.com/ blog/2014/03/rethinking-gnostic-intellectuals-cate- gories-as-weapons-and-history-as-construct/.
Vermes, Geza. 1993. The Religion of Jesus the Jew. London: SCM.
Wright, N. T. 2003. Resurrection of the Son of God. London: SPCK.
———. 2014. “N. T. Wright ranks the top places for New Testament Studies.” The Jesus Blog. http://histori- caljesusresearch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/nt-wright- ranks-top-new-testament.html [no longer available]
Published
2014-12-02
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Crossley, J. (2014). Is the Grass Greener? A View from Biblical Studies. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 43(4), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.v43i4.29
