A Deep-Seated Schism
Fundamental Discussions in the Study of Religions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.v44i4.28973Keywords:
definition, religion, philosophyAbstract
-
References
Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gupta, Anil. 2015. “Definitions.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed October 24, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/definitions/. `
Hvidtfeldt, Rolf, Esben Nedenskov Petersen. and Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell (forthcoming) “What Should We Demand of a Definition of Learning?” In On the Definition of Learning, edited by Ane Qvortrup, Merete Wiberg, Gerd Christensen, and Mikala Hansbøl. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Rein, Nathan. 2014. “When Is a Religion Like a Weed? Some Thoughts on Why and How We Define Things.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44 (4): 10–18.
Simmons, J. Aaron. 2014. “A Search for the ‘Really’ Real: Philosophically Approaching the Task of Defining Religion.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44 (4): 18–25.
Simmons, K. Merinda. 2014. “Worlds Apart: The Essentials of Critical Thinking.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44 (4): 25–32.
Strenski, Ivan. 2003. “Why it is Better to Know Some of the Questions than All of the Answers.” In Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 15: 169–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006803765218236.
Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, Caroline. 2014. “On Essentialism and Real Definitions of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 82: 495–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfu015.
———. forthcoming. “Wittgenstein’s Critique of Frazer and Realism/Anti-realism Concerning Religion.”In Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer, edited by Albinus, Rothhaupt & Seery. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gupta, Anil. 2015. “Definitions.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed October 24, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/definitions/. `
Hvidtfeldt, Rolf, Esben Nedenskov Petersen. and Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell (forthcoming) “What Should We Demand of a Definition of Learning?” In On the Definition of Learning, edited by Ane Qvortrup, Merete Wiberg, Gerd Christensen, and Mikala Hansbøl. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Rein, Nathan. 2014. “When Is a Religion Like a Weed? Some Thoughts on Why and How We Define Things.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44 (4): 10–18.
Simmons, J. Aaron. 2014. “A Search for the ‘Really’ Real: Philosophically Approaching the Task of Defining Religion.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44 (4): 18–25.
Simmons, K. Merinda. 2014. “Worlds Apart: The Essentials of Critical Thinking.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44 (4): 25–32.
Strenski, Ivan. 2003. “Why it is Better to Know Some of the Questions than All of the Answers.” In Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 15: 169–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006803765218236.
Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, Caroline. 2014. “On Essentialism and Real Definitions of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 82: 495–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfu015.
———. forthcoming. “Wittgenstein’s Critique of Frazer and Realism/Anti-realism Concerning Religion.”In Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer, edited by Albinus, Rothhaupt & Seery. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Published
2016-01-15
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, C. (2016). A Deep-Seated Schism: Fundamental Discussions in the Study of Religions. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 44(4), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.v44i4.28973
