Nothing Outside the Text?
Religion and its Others in Emoji Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.34261Keywords:
Emoji, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, Concept of ReligionAbstract
The authors of "Emoji Dei: Religious Iconography in the Digital Age" respond to Joseph Laycock's discussion of their essay. This response focuses on methodological issues and offers a critical assessment of the claim that "religion" is a second-order category.
References
Nongbri, Brent. “Dislodging ‘Embedded’ Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly Trope.” Numen 55 (2008): 440–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852708X310527.
Smith, Jonathan Z. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 269–84. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Smith, Jonathan Z. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 269–84. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Published
2017-12-21
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
McIvor, M., & Amesbury, R. (2017). Nothing Outside the Text? Religion and its Others in Emoji Discourse. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 46(3-4), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.34261