Tips for Teaching. Name It and Disclaim It
A Tool for Better Discussion in Religious Studies
Keywords:fallacy, medical materialism, religious studies
This article proposes a strategy of creating labels for problematic ways doing analysis in religious studies classes. By identifying patterns of weak analysis and naming them, faculty can give students the ability to talk about analysis and become more critical in their approach to religious studies.
Crossan, John Dominic, and Richard G. Watts. 1999. Who is Jesus?: Answers to Your Questions about the Historical Jesus. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
Ehrman, Bart D. 2013. Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth. New York: HarperOne.
Fagan, Garrett G. 2010. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. London: Routledge.
James, William. 1982. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Penguin Books.
“Obituary: Professor Antony Flew.” 2010. The Scotsman, https://www.scotsman.com/news/obituaries/obituary-professor-antony-flew-1-799918.
Orsi, Robert A. 2001. “Everyday Miracles: The Study of Lived Religion.” In Lived Religion in America: Toward a History of Practice, edited by David D. Hall, 3–21. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith, William Cantwell. 1974. “Comparative Religion: Whither––and Why?” In The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology, edited by Mircea Eliade and Joseph M. Kitagawa, 31–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strieber, Whitley, and Jeffrey J. Kripal. 2017. The Super Natural: Why the Unexplained Is Real. New York: Tarcher
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1982. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.