Is There Room for Theory in the Study of Religion?

A Question Revisited

Authors

  • Philip L. Tite University of Washington

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.39920

Keywords:

religious studies, theory, method

Abstract

This editor's introduction presents this issue of the Bulletin, while raising an important question: Is there room for theory in religious studies? Offers an overview and critique of current trends in theorizing religion.

Author Biography

Philip L. Tite, University of Washington

Philip L. Tite is an Affiliate Lecturer at the University of Washington and an adjunct instructor at Seattle University in Seattle WA USA. He holds a PhD degree from McGill University (2005) and has authored several books and articles. His most recent books include The Apocryphal Epistle to the Laodiceans: An Epistolary and Rhetorical Analysis (TENT, 7; Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2012) and Valentinian Ethics and Paraenetic Discourse: Determining the Social Function of Moral Exhortation in Valentinian Christianity (NHMS, 67; Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2009). As a specialist in the study of early Christianity, in particular Valentinian Gnosticism, Tite has strong interests in elucidating social processes at work in the study of religious phenomena. He also has strong interests in method and theory, religion and violence, and pedagogical issues in the academic study of religion.

References

Bell, Catherine. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 1997. Ritual: Perspective and Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 1998. “Performance.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Edited by Mark C. Taylor, 205–24. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Press.

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.2307/2574696.

Foucault, Michel. 1994 [1970; French 1966]. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.

Harré, Rom. 1992. “What’s Real in Psychology: A Plea for Persons.” Theory and Psychology 2.2: 153-58.

Harré, Rom, and Luk van Langenhove, editors. 1992. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.

———. 1999. “Varieties of Positioning.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20: 393–407.

Harré, Rom, and Nikki Slocum. 2003. “Disputes as Complex Social Events: On the Uses of Positioning Theory.” Common Knowledge 9 (1): 100–18. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-9-1-100.

Mack, Burton L. 2000. “Social Formation.” In The Guide to the Study of Religion. Edited by Willi Braun and Russell T. McCutcheon, 283–96. London: Cassell.

Mennell, Stephen. 1998. “The Formation of We-Images: A Process Theory.” In Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Edited by Craig Calhoun, 175–97. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schaefer, Donovan O. 2015. Religious Affects: Animality, Evolution and Power. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.12378.

Stausberg, Michael, and Steven Engler. 2016. “Theories of Religion.” In The Handbook of the Study of Religion. Edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler, 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfx053.

Rebillard, Éric. 2012. Christians and Their Many Identities in Late Antiquity, North Africa, 200–450 CE. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0038713413004090.

Thomlinson, John. 2000. “Proximity Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 3 (3): 402-14.

Tite, Philip L. 2003. “Is There Room for Theory in Religious Studies?” ARC: The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University 31: 1-12.

Torre, Andre, and Alain Rallet. 2005. “Proximity and Localization." Regional Studies 39 (1): 47-59.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-11

How to Cite

Tite, P. (2019). Is There Room for Theory in the Study of Religion? A Question Revisited. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 48(1-2), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.39920

Issue

Section

The Editorial