Jesus wept, robots can’t

religion into the future

Authors

  • Sam Gill University of Colorado, Boulder

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.16899

Keywords:

technology, religion theory, artificial intelligence, body, weeping/crying

Abstract

Exploring the implications of the shortest of biblical verses ‘Jesus wept’ in contrast with the incapability of robots to weep or feel empathy and emotion as exemplified in the classic post-apocalyptic film Terminator 2, this essay argues that movement, gesture, body, experience and improvization are essential elements to any emerging valued world. Certainly religion, despite our strong association of it with the spiritual and the immaterial, does not and cannot exist, or even be imagined, apart from these distinctively human biological features. The study of religion must be, among other concerns, grounded in biology.

Author Biography

  • Sam Gill, University of Colorado, Boulder

    Sam Gill, Professor Emeritus at the University of Colorado at Boulder, is the author of many books and articles, most recently: Dancing Culture Religion: Religion (2012), Religion and Technology into the Future (2018), Creative Encounters, Appreciating Difference (2019), and The Proper Study of Religion: Building on Jonathan Z. Smith (2020).

References

Asimov, I. (1950 [1942]) Runaround. In I, Robot: The Day of the Mechanical Men. New York: Gnome Press.

Baudrillard, J. (1994 [1981]) Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

Collier, L. (2014) Why we cry: new research is opening eyes to the psychology of tears. American Psychological Association 45(2): 47. https://doi.org/10.1037/e501432014-009

Gibson, W. (1984) Neuromancer. New York: Berkeley Publishing Group.

Gill, S. (2012) Dancing Culture Religion. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

Gill, S. (2018) Religion and Technology into the Future: From Adam to Tomorrow’s Eve. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

Gill, S. (2019) Creative Encounters, Appreciating Difference: Perspectives and Strategies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

Gill, S. (2020) The Proper Study of Religion: Building on Jonathan Z. Smith. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gracanin, A., Bylsma, L. M. and Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2018) Why only humans shed emotional tears: evolutionary and cultural perspectives. Human Nature 29: 104–33. Retrieved on 27 June 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-018-9312-8.

Haraway, D. (1991) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simions, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature 149–82. New York: Routledge.

Heller-Roazen, D. (2011) The Fifth Hammer: Pythagoras and the Disharmony of the World. New York: Zone Books.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1991 [1988]) Can thought go on without a body? In The Inhuman: Reflections on Time 8–23. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Neihardt, J. G. (2002 [1912]) A Cycle of the West: The Song of Three Friends, The Song of Hugh Glass, The Song of Jed Smith, The Song of the Indian Wars, The Song of the Messiah. Lincoln: Bison Books.

Serres, M. (2011) Variations on the Body 13. Minneapolis: Univocal.

Tweed, T. (2006) Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044517

Vinge, V. (1993) The coming technological singularity: how to survive in the post-human era. Conference paper, Department of Mathematical Sciences, San Diego State University, California

Published

2021-08-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gill, S. . (2021). Jesus wept, robots can’t: religion into the future. Body and Religion, 4(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.16899