The Reality of Religious Labels

A Study of Muslim Religiosity

Authors

  • Riaz Hassan Flinders University
  • Carolyn Corkindale Flinders University
  • Jessica Sutherland Flinders University

Keywords:

Muslim Identity/Religiosity

Abstract

The meaning of the religious labels used by people to describe themselves and others is often problematic. Religiosity, religious behavior and experience vary in the way they are reported and understood. This study presents a methodological approach to investigating the relationship between self-reported religiosity and an objectively constructed index of religious intensity. The data were obtained from a multi-country study of Muslim religiosity in which over 6000 Muslim respondents were surveyed through a structured questionnaire. The survey questionnaire included questions on the self-reported religiosity of the respondent and forty four items to ascertain respondents’ attitudes toward key Islamic beliefs and practices. A multiple item religious intensity scale was extracted through factor analysis from these forty four items. The percentage distribution of self-reported religiosity is reported by country and globally and then cross tabulated against the religious intensity index. In all countries those who labeled themselves as very religious also had the strongest religious intensity. A correlational analysis between the two measures of religiosity was performed which revealed a highly significant correlation between the two measures. The sociological significance of this finding is that self-reported religiosity can be a reliable and valid measure of religious commitment. The paper concludes with a discussion of varying levels of religiosity found in different countries and offers some cultural explanations of the observed variations making a timely contribution to understanding Muslim religiosity in the modern world.

References

Abramowitz, J.S. et al. 2002 Religious Obsessions and Compulsions in a Non-clinical Sample: The Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS). Behaviour Research and Therapy 40: 825-38. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00070-5 PMid:12074376.

Argyle, M., and B. Beit-Hallahami 1975 The Social Psychology of Religion. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

Baider, L. et al. 2001 The System of Belief Inventory (SBI-15): A Validation Study in Israel. Psycho-Oncology 10: 534-40. doi:10.1002/pon.554 PMid:11747065.

Carkoglu, A. 2003 Religiosity, Support for Seriat and Evaluations of Secularist Public Policies in Turkey. Department of Political Science and International Relations, Sabanci University, Istanbul.

Political Preferences of the Turkish Electorate: Reflections of an Alevi–Sunni Cleavage. Turkish Studies 6(2): 273-92. doi:10.1080/14683840500119593.

Geertz, C. 1968 Islam Observed: Religious Developments in Morocco and Indonesia. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Gellner, E. 1983 Muslim Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Ghorbani, N. et al. 2000 Muslim Attitudes towards Religion Scale: Factors, Validity and Complexity of Relationships with Mental Health in Iran. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 3(2): 125-33. doi:10.1080/713685603.

Haddad, Y.Y., and A.T. Lummis 1987 Islamic Values in the United States: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, New York.

Hassan, R. 2003 Faithlines: Muslim Conceptions of Religion and Society. Oxford University Press, Karachi.

Lazar, A., S. Kravetz and P. Fredrich-Kedem 2002 The Multidimensionality of Motivation for Jewish Religious Behavior: Content, Structure and Relationship to Religious Identity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41: 509-18.

Leege, G., and L. Kellstedt (eds.) 1993 Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.

Peek, L. 2005 Becoming Muslim: The Development of a Religious Identity. Sociology of Religion 66(3): 215-42. doi:10.2307/4153097.

Rahman, F. 1982 Islam and Modernity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Major Themes of the Quran. Bibliotheca Islamica, Minneapolis.

Sawatsky, R., P.A. Ratner and L. Chiu 2005 A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research 72: 153-88. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-5577-x.

Smidt, C.E. 2005 Religion and American Attitudes toward Islam and an Invasion of Iraq. Sociology of Religion 66(3): 243-65. doi:10.2307/4153098.

Smith, T.W. 2006 Spiritual and Religious Transformations in America: The National Spiritual Transformation Study. National Opinion Research Centre, University of Chicago, Chicago.

Traphagan, J.W. 2005 Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Research on Aging 27: 387-419. doi:10.1177/0164027505276049.

Vilchinsky, N., and S. Kravetz 2005 How are Religious Belief and Behaviour Good for You? An Investigation of Mediators Relating Religion to Mental Health in a Sample of Israeli Jewish Students. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44: 459-71.

Watt, W.M. 1988 Islamic Fundamentalism and Modernity, Routledge, London.

Wenger, JL., and T.D. Yarbrough, 2005 Religious Individuals: Evaluating their Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations at the Implicit level of Awareness. Journal of Social Psychology 145: 5-16. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.1.5-16 PMid:15739775.

Wullf, D.M. 1997 Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Views. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Published

2009-03-04

Issue

Section

Journal for the Academic Study of Religion

Categories