Pecha Kuchas as creative compositions

How speech, images, and written sources combine to convey meaning

Authors

  • Katie S. Dredger James Madison University
  • Crystal L. Beach The University of Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21630

Keywords:

adolescent literacy, pecha kucha, 21st century literacies, multimodal composition, teacher preparation

Abstract

The Pecha Kucha talk is an effective way to encourage the composition process; to promote the use of effective visuals to explain and engage; and to distribute the expertise in the classroom away from the teacher as the central expert and to the students. In this paper, we describe and give an example of what is called a Pecha Kucha (Japanese for ‘chit chat’). When examined within the frameworks of theorists in the areas of composition, pedagogy, and literacy, this emerging presentation genre is promising for both composer and audience. With this in mind, we first discuss ways that the creator of the Pecha Kucha may benefit from the specific composition space. We then share how this composition exercise is an effective teaching tool. Next, we show ways that this presentation style maximizes learning with image and speech coordination and skills of analysis and synthesis. Then we introduce how Pecha Kuchas give students the opportunity to teach and to work with technological tools in authentic ways. Finally, implications for future practice in developing compositions using oral delivery with visuals are discussed.

Author Biographies

Katie S. Dredger, James Madison University

Katie S. Dredger, Ph.D. is an assistant professor of adolescent literacy in the department of Early, Elementary, and Reading Education at James Madison University.

Crystal L. Beach, The University of Georgia

Crystal L. Beach is a current high school English teacher at Buford High School and a language and literacy education doctoral candidate at The University of Georgia.

References

Alvermann, D. (2008). Why bother theorizing adolescents’ online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52 (1), 8–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2

Beach, C. L. (2009). The blogging factor. Retrieved from http://youtube/ A4cGU7azeKA

Beach, C. L., Kajder, S., and Dredger, K. (2012, November). Featured session: The Pecha Kucha as creative connection. Presented at NCTE Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV.

Beach, R. and O’Brien (2015). Using apps and learning with literacy across the curriculum. New York: Taylor and Francis.

Beyer, A. M. (2011). Improving student presentations: Pecha Kucha and just plain powerpoint. Teaching of Psychology, 38(2), 122–126. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0098628311401588

Chafe, W. and Danielwicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz and S. J. Samuels (Eds), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Coiro, J. and Kajder, S. (2011). Conversation currents: Digital footprints. Published Interview and Podcast. Language Arts, 39 (2), 148–153.

Creative Commons. (2015). Creative commons. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/

Christianson, M. and Payne, S. (2011). ‘Helping students develop skills for better presentations: using the 20 × 20 format for presentation training.’ Language Research Bulletin, 26, 1–11.

Dredger, K. and Conaway, S. (2013). ‘Presentations.’ In S. Carter-Tod (Ed.) Writing at Virginia Tech: Written, Spoken and Visual Composition. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Dredger, K., Kajder, S., and Beach, C. (2013). The Pecha Kucha 20X20 as assessment: Creation, selection, explanation, synthesis and delivery. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy, Blacksburg, VA.

Dredger, K., Woods, D., Beach, C., and Sagstetter, V. (2010). Engage me: Using new literacies to create third space classrooms that engage today’s student writers. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2 (October).

Duarte, N. (2008). Slide:ology: The art and science of creating great presentations. Cambridge: O’Reilly.

Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Evans, G. (2008). iPhoneography. Retrieved from http://www.iphoneography.com

Fisher, D., Brozo, W. G., Frey, N., and Ivey, G. (2011). 50 instructional routines to develop content literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Gainer, J. (2013). 21st-Century mentor texts: Developing critical literacies for the information age. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57 (1), 16–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.210

Goody, J. (1988). The interface between the written and the oral. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gries, L. E., and Brooke, C. G. (2010). An inconvenient tool: Rethinking the role of slideware in the writing classroom. Composition Studies, 38 (1), 11–28.

Hacker, D. J., and Graesser, A. C. (2007). The role of dialogue in reciprocal teaching and naturalistic tutoring. In R. Horowitz (Ed.) Talking Texts: How speech and writing interact in school learning, 253–270. New York: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz and S. J. Samuels (Eds), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55–82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Inc.

Hardin, E. E. (2007). Presentation software in the college classroom: Don’t forget the instructor. Teaching of Psychology, 34 (1), 53–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 009862830703400112

Harris, T. L. and Hodges, R. E. (2005). The literacy dictionary. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Horowitz, R. (Ed.). (2007). Talking texts: How speech and writing interact in school learning. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

Horowitz, R. (1994). A themed issue on classroom talk about text: What teenagers and teachers come to know about the world through talk about text. Journal of Reading 37 (7), 532–538.

Howe, C. and Manzoorul, A. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43 (3), 325–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024

Hughes, R. (2010). Teaching and researching speaking. New York: Routledge.

Jana, R. (2007). Trend: Pecha Kucha night. Business Week, No. 4049 (10 December), p. 3. Retrieved from http://images.businessweek.com/ ss/07/08/0830_in_short/source/7.htm

Jones, R. H. (2009). Technology and sites of display. In C. Jewitt (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 114–125). London: Routledge.

Katayama, A. D., and Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students ‘partially’ involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. Journal of Experimental Education, 68 (2), 119–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598498

Kist, W. (2013). New literacies and the common core. Educational Leadership, 70 (6), 38–43.

Klein Dytham Architecture. (2015). Pecha Kucha 20x20. Retrieved from http:// www.pechakucha.org/

Klentzin, J. C., Paladino, E. B., Johnston, B., and Devine, C. (2010). Pecha Kucha: Using ‘lightning talk’ in university instruction. Reference Services Review, 38 (1), 158–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907321011020798

Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. (Eds). (2007). A New Literacies sampler. New York: Peter Lang

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754

Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, B. J., and Caterno, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 28–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(85)90003-7

Lessig, L. (2009). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., and Pollock, J. E. (2004). Classroom instruction that works. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Moghe, S. [sumeetmmoghe] (2012). A pecha kucha about pecha kucha. [Video file] (12 March). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=jJ2yepIaAtE#t=15

Palincsar, A., and Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehensionfostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

Pecha Kucha Global Organization. (2015). Facebook. Retrieved from https://www. facebook.com/PechaKuchaGlobal/info?ref=page_internal

Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead.

Robinson, D. H., Robinson, S. L., and Katayama, A. D. (1999). When words are represented in memory like picture: Evidence for spatial encoding of study materials. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 38–54. http://dx.doi. org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0979

Seglam, R., Witte, S., and Beemer, J. (2012). 21st century literacies in the classroom: Creating windows of interest and webs of learning. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8 (2), 47–65. Retrieved from http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2012/10/21st-Century-Literacies-in-the-Classroom.pdf

Swift, T. (2011). Red. On Red. Nashville, TN: Big Machine.

Published

2016-11-14

How to Cite

Dredger, K. S., & Beach, C. L. (2016). Pecha Kuchas as creative compositions: How speech, images, and written sources combine to convey meaning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(2), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21630

Issue

Section

From the e-Sphere