The Art of Storytelling

A Pedagogy for Proposal Writing

Authors

  • Josephine Walwema Oakland University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v7i1.26246

Keywords:

Pedagogy, proposal writing, storytelling, technical writing

Abstract

This article is based on the idea that there is latent storytelling already in proposals. It explores the various ways in which storytelling functions as a pedagogical model of teaching the writing of proposals in business and technical writing courses. The central premise is that stories, like proposals, are forms of discourse that place events sequentially from beginning to end with meaningful and graspable connections in between. Stories take (identified) audiences into account by being selective of events that are carefully rearranged and described through composites of scenarios and characters. This article explores those storytelling patterns in theory and in practice. It aims to enhance the perspective of teaching proposal writing by calling attention to a seemingly inconsequential or unrelated notion – storytelling.

Author Biography

Josephine Walwema, Oakland University

Josephine Walwema is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Writing and Rhetoric at Oakland University, where she teaches courses in technical and professional communication, global and legal rhetorics. She obtained her Ph.D. from Clemson University, where she studied in the Rhetoric, Communication and Information Design (RCID) program. She has presented at national and international conferences on approaches to teaching and learning in professional writing.

References

Aristotle (2007) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (2nd edition; trans. G. A. Kennedy). New York: Oxford University Press.

Armstrong, J. M. (1998) Aristotle on the philosophical nature of poetry. The Classical Quarterly (New Series) 48(2): 447–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cq/48.2.447.

Benjamin, W. (1968) The storyteller: Reflections on the works of Nikolai Leskov. In H. Arendt (ed.) Illuminations 83–109. New York: Schocken Books.

Bettelheim, B. (2010) The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales. New York: Random House.

Berkenkotter, C. (2001) Genre systems at work DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication 18(3): 326–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018003004.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.

Burns, R. P. (1999) A Theory of the Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Connor, U. (2000) Variations in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text 20: 1–28. http://dx.doi.org:10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.1.

Connor, U. and Mauranen, A. (1999) Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 18: 47–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00026-4.

Connor, U. and Wagner, L. (1999) Language use in grant proposals by nonprofits: Spanish and English. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising 22: 59–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pf.2205.

Czarniawska, B. (1998) A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Delgado, R. (1989) Storytelling for oppositionists and others. Michigan Law Review 87: 2411–2441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07307795.

Dundes, A. (1987) Parsing through Customs: Essays by a Freudian Folklorist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Edlund, J. R. (2012) Ethos, logos, pathos: Three ways to persuade. Retrieved on 29 May 2014 from http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/jgarret/3waypers.htm.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1975) Against Method. London and New York: Verso.

Fisher, W. R. (1994). Narrative rationality and the logic of scientific discourse. Argumentation 8(1): 21–32.

Flaherty, F. (2009) The Elements of Story. New York: Harper Collins.

Friedland, J. (2012, April 5) Philosophy is not science. New York Times. Retrieved on 20 January 2014 from http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/philosophy-is-not-a-science/.

Gabriel, Y. (2000) Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.

Geiger, D. (2008) The dark side of narratives: Challenging the epistemological nature of narrative knowledge. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 3(1): 66–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2008.018531.

Graesser, A. C., Olde, B. and Klettke, B. (2002) How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange and T. C. Brock (eds.) Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations 231–263. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Halleck, G. B., and Connor, U. M. (2006) Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(1): 70–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.08.001.

Johnson-Sheehan, R. (2008) Writing Proposals. Pearson Longman.

Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Lee, H. N. (1972) Time and continuity. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 10(3): 295–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1972.tb01089.x.

Lepori, B. and Rocci, A. A. (2009) Reasonableness in grant proposal writing. Studies in Communication Sciences 9(2): 171–189. Retrieved on 20 February 2014 from https://ssl.lu.usi.ch/entityws/Allegati/pdf_pub4640.pdf.

Levi-Strauss, C. (1969) The Raw and the Cooked: Introduction to a Science of Mythology: I. London: Jonathan Cape.

Meister, J. C. (2011) Narratology. In Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W., and Schanert, J. (eds.) The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/narratology.

Miller, J. L. (1994) The surprise of a recognizable person as troubling presence in educational research and writing. Curriculum Inquiry 24(4): 503–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1179955.

Morabia, A. (2013) Hume, Mill, Hill, and the sui generis epidemiologic approach to causal inference. American Journal of Epidemiology 178(10): 1526–1532. http://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt223.

Myers, G. (1990) Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

National Science Foundation (2014, February) Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. Retrieved on 1 March 2014 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf14001/nsf14_1.pdf.

Perelman, C. (1982) The Realm of Rhetoric (trans. William Kluback). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Porter, A. L. and Rossini, F. A. (1985) Peer review of interdisciplinary research proposals. Science, Technology, & Human Values 10: 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224398501000304.

Riessman, C. K. (1993) Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

Riessman, C. K. (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.

Sullivan, A. M. (2000) Voices inside schools: Notes from a marine biologist’s daughter: On the art and science of attention. Harvard Educational Review 70(2): 211–227. Retrieved on 25 May 2014 from http://her.hepg.org/content/x8601x6tn8p256wk/.

Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Taboada, A. and Guthrie, J. T. (2006) Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research 38(1): 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_1.

Tardy, C. M. (2003) A genre system view of the funding of academic research. Written Communication 20(1): 7–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253569.

Van Nostrand, A. D. (1994) A genre map of R&D knowledge production for the U. S Department of Defense. In A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds.) Genre and the New Rhetoric 133–145. London: Taylor and Francis.

Whalen, T. (1986) Improved proposal writing: unity, coherence, and emphasis. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication 49(4): 14–15. Retrieved on 1 March 2014 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ343610.

Published

2015-06-13

How to Cite

Walwema, J. (2015). The Art of Storytelling: A Pedagogy for Proposal Writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 7(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v7i1.26246

Issue

Section

Featured Essay