Who Wins?

First Grade Authors Do!

Authors

  • Rebecca G. Harper Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i3.665

Keywords:

first grade, motivation, cross-content literacy, non-fiction writing, engagement

Abstract

Common Core Standards involve an increased emphasis on non-fiction reading and writing. Across grade bands, students are expected to read and compose a variety of non-fiction texts as well as develop age appropriate research skills. With this in mind, the author worked with a 1st grade teacher to use Jerry Pallotta’s Who Would Win? series in a class non-fiction writing project that was standards-based. The class consisted of a wide range of ability levels, so the author and teacher frequently used cooperative learning strategies throughout the entire process. Using the series as a model, the students were guided through the writing process, from pre-writing to publishing, with the culminating activity being a meeting with Pallotta where students presented him with their class authored Who Would Win? book. As a result of the writing unit, students were able to experience non-fiction texts on a variety of levels and craft a quality piece of literature that was authentic, relevant, and personal.

References

Brophy, J. (2004) Motivating Students to Learn. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Brophy, J. (2008) Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist 43(3): 132–141. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/00461520701756511.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18: 32–42. http://dx.doi. org/10.3102/0013189X018001032.

Boynton, A. and Blevins, W. (2004) 5 keys to reading nonfiction. Instructor 113: 4–6.

Calkins, L. (2006) A Guide to The Writing Workshop, Grades 3–5. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: First Hand.

Cambria, J. and Guthrie, J. T. (2010) Motivating and engaging students in reading. NERA Journal 46(1): 16–29. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://literacyconnects. org/img/2013/03/Motivating-and-engaging-students-in-reading- Cambria-Guthrie.pdf.

Chall, J. (1983) Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.

DeFord, D. (2004) Dominie Reading Assessment. Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Learning Group.

Duke, N. (2000) 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in the first grade. Reading Research Quarterly 35: 202–224. http://dx.doi. org/10.1598/RR Q.35.2.1.

Duke, N. (2004) The case for informational text. Educational Leadership 61: 40–44. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educationalleadership/ mar04/vol61/num06/The-Case-for-Informational-Text.aspx.

Duke, N. and Bennett-Armistead, V. (2003) Reading and Writing Informational Text in the Primary Grades: Research-Based Practices. New York: Scholastic.

Duke, N., Bennett-Armistead, S. and Roberts, E. (2003) Filling the great void: Why we should bring nonfiction into the early-grade classroom. American Educator 27: 30–34. Retrieved on 11 July 2014 from http://www.aft.org/ newspubs/periodicals/ae/spring2003/duke.cfm.

Duke, N. K., Purcell-Gates, V., Hall, L. A. and Tower, C. (2006). Authentic literacy activities for developing comprehension and writing. Reading Teacher 60: 344–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT .60.4.4

Flower, L. and Hayes, J. R. (1981) A cognitive process theory. College Composition and Communication 32(4): 365–387. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/356600.

Flowers, T. A. and Flowers, L. A. (2009) Nonfiction in the early grades: Making reading and writing relevant for all. Journal for the Liberal Arts and Sciences 13(2): 40—50. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from https://www.clemson.edu/ centers-institutes/houston/documents/nonfiction.pdf.

Fisher, B. (1996) Moving beyond “letter of the week.” Teaching PreK–8 26: 74–76. Retrieved on 11 July 2014 from http://proxygsuwgt1.galileo.usg.edu/ login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=fth&AN=9 512293019&site=eds-live&scope=site.

Gewertz, C. (2012) Districts gird for added use of nonfiction. Education Week 31(12): 1–14. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/artic les/2012/03/14/24informational_ep.h31.html.

Goodwin, B. and Miller, K. (2012) Research says nonfiction reading promotes student success. Educational Leadership 70(4): 80–82. Retrieved on 11 July 2014 from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/dec12/ vol70/num04/Nonfiction-Reading-Promotes-Student-Success.aspx.

Graves, D. (1980/1994) A Fresh Look at Writing. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Graves, D. (1983) Writing Teachers and Children at Work. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Hadaway, N., Vardell, S. and Young, T. (2002) Highlighting nonfiction literature: Literacy development and English Language Learners. The New England Research Association Journal 38: 16–22. Retrieved on 18 July 2014 from http:// gwinnett.k12.ga.us/HopkinsES/Alfonso_Web/ESOL%20Modification%20 Research/ELL_fiction_books.pdf.

Hayes, J. (1996) A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy and S. Ransdell (eds.) The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1–27. Mahwah: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hayes, J. (2009) From idea to text. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley and M. Nystrand (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Writing Development 65–79. London: Sage Publications.

Heath. S. B. (1983) Ways with Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.

Kellogg, R. (1990) Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology 103: 327–342. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1423213.

Kellogg, R. (1996) A model of working memory in writing. In M. Levy and S. E. Ransdell (eds.) The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 57–72. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kellogg, R. (2001) Competition for working memory among writing processes. American Journal of Psychology 114: 175–191. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1423513.

Kittle, P. (2008) Write beside Them: Risk, Voice, and Clarity in High School Writing. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Lipson, M. Y., Valencia, S. W., Wixson, K. K. and Peters, C. W. (1993) Integration and thematic teaching: Integration to improve teaching and learning. Language Arts 70(4): 252–263. Retrieved on 11 July 2014 from http://www. jstor.org/stable/41482091.

Malloy, J. A. and Gambrell, L. B. (2008) New insights on motivation in the literacy classroom. In C. C. Block and S. R. Parris (eds.) Comprehension Instruction: Research-based Best Practices (2nd edition) 226–238. New York: Guilford.

McGraw-Hill (2012) AAA The Common Core: Clarifying Expectations for Teachers and Students. English Language Arts. New York: McGraw-Hill.

National Council of Teachers of English (2013) National Council of Teachers of English: NCTE Beliefs About the Teaching of Writing. Retrieved on 13 May 2013 from www.ncte.org.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards. Washington, D. C.: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

National Writing Project (2012) National Writing Project website. Professional Development. Retrieved on 30 July 30 2012 from www.nwp.org.

National Commission on Writing for Americas Families, Schools, and Colleges (2003) The Neglected “R”: The Need for a Writing Revolution. Washington, D. C.: The National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges.

Neuman, S. B. and Roskos, K. (1997) Literacy knowledge in practice: Contexts of participation for young writers and readers. Reading Research Quarterly 32: 10–32. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://www.sbneuman.com/pdf/ LiteracyKnowledge.pdf.

Pallotta, J. (2010a) Who Would Win? Killer Whale vs. Great White Shark. New York: Scholastic.

Pallotta, J. (2010b) Who Would Win? Lion vs. Tiger. New York: Scholastic.

Pallotta, J. (2010c) Who Would Win? Polar Bear vs. Grizzly Bear. New York: Scholastic.

Routman, R. (2000) Conversations: Strategies for Teaching, Learning, and Evaluating. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Routman, R. (2004) Writing Essentials: Raising Expectations and Results While Simplifying Teaching. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1973) The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Totten, S. (2005). Writing to Learn for Preservice Teachers. The Quarterly of the National Writing Project 27(2): 17–20. Retrieved on 11 July 2014 from http:// www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/2231.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Young, T. A. and Moss, B. (2006) Nonfiction in the classroom library: A literacy necessity. Childhood Education 82: 207–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000940 56.2006.10522824.

Published

2014-12-05

How to Cite

Harper, R. G. (2014). Who Wins? First Grade Authors Do!. Writing and Pedagogy, 6(3), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i3.665

Issue

Section

Reflections on Practice